Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Oct-07-2011
..... registered with gorwa police station, vadodar, for the offencespunishable under sections-498-a, 207, 315 and 114 of the indian penalcod and sections-3 and 7 of the dowry prohibition act. 2. learnedadvocate appearing for applicant has contended from the papers, itappears that presence of applicant-accused is not established andlooking to the role attributed to the applicant, it appears thatapplicant .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Oct-03-2011
Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() { var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") { SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value = searchhi_string; if( location.hash.length > 1 ) location.hash = location.hash; } } Print CR.MA/12900/20114/4ORDERINTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADCRIMINALMISC.APPLICATION No. 12900 of 2011=========================================SALMABENW/O KASAM MANIYAR - Applicant(s)VersusSTATEOF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)=========================================Appearance:MRABHAYKUMAR P SHAH for Applicant(s) : 1,MR KL PANDYA ADDITIONALPUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) :1,=========================================CORAM: HONOURABLEMR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYEDDate: 03/10/2011 ORALORDER Inthe facts and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jan-24-2011
..... court:1.1 mr. paresh m. shah not party in person being a jamalji karimji nagorwala, who has filed present civil revision application no. 1871/2010 under provisions of bombay rent act.2. the present civil revision application is preferred by heirs of jamalji karimji nagorwala original defendant tenant. the heirs of jamalji karimji nagorwala are subhanabibi ..... let registry may inquire and find out whether said general power of attorney holder mr. shah, under gujarat high court rules can appear as party in person and act on behalf of petitioners or not? and whether in such circumstances, advocate is required to be engaged by general power of attorney holder or not?. if permission is ..... general power of attorney holder to argue matter on behalf of petitioners before this court then it amounts to give permission to general power of attorney holder to act as an advocate or agent of petitioners.5. therefore, let rules may be find out and whatever office objections are still remained to be removed on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jan-31-2011
..... 23 eliminated candidates, of even date, in which the name of the petitioner is shown at sr.no.23. the petitioner filed an application under the right to information act for more information and came to know that the gpsc has issued corrigendum dated 04.01.2011 pursuant to which the subsequent notification dated 10.01.2011, including the name ..... case and in the interest of justice; (c) your lordships may further be pleased to declare that the notification dated 14/12/'10 is legal, valid and to be acted upon by the respondents in the facts and the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice;(d) pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, ..... case and in the interest of justice;(c) your lordships may further be pleased to declare that the notification dated 14/12/'10 is legal, valid and to be acted upon by the respondents in the facts and the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice;(d) pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Mar-03-2011
..... set aside criminal complaint being criminal case no.1743 of 2010 filed before the additional chief judicial magistrate, anand for the offences punishable under section 138 of the negotiable instrument act at annexure-"a" to the application".2. this court while issuing notice on 25.06.2010 granted ad-interim relief in terms of para 7(b) of the application.3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jan-25-2011
..... be disclosed under section 8(1)(d) of the rti act as a trade secrets......". (emphasis supplied). later on, by letter dated 11.1.2011, they disclosed the information sought for. this shows that the bonafides of the ..... the petition page no.21. the reply given is interesting. it was stated that "information sought for cannot be disclosed under section 8(1)(d) of the rti act as a trade secrets.....". (emphasis supplied). similarly, in paragraph 4 of the said letter, the authorities stated that "the information sought for himatnagar godhra territory cannot ..... sales tax department. even, if two partnership firms have one or two common partners under the law they remain separate legal entity. that being so, the act of disqualifying the petitioner partnership firm by respondent nos.1 and 2 on the ground that one common person has applied for different areas is not legal. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jan-25-2011
..... , filed before wankaner city police station, for the offences punishable under sections-323, 325, 504, 394 and 114 of the indian penal code and section-135 of the bombay police act.3. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the alleged complaint is an offshoot of a land deal, with regard to which certain disputes are going on between the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jan-25-2011
..... 2010 for the offences punishable under sections 323, 366, 376(g), 504, 506(2), 450 r/w.section 120-b of the ipc and section 135 of the bombay police act.2. mr.tolia, learned advocate representing the applicant submitted that the police investigation is over and chargesheet is filed. considering the fir and more particularly the statement of the prosecutrix ..... ;b. not to try to tamper or pressurize the prosecution witnesses or complainant in any manner;c. maintain law and order and should co-operate the investigating officers;d. not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;e. not leave the local limits of state of gujarat without the prior permission of the concerned sessions judge;g .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jan-27-2011
..... to the satisfaction of the lower court and subject to the following conditions that he shall:(a) not take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;(c) maintain law and order;(d) not leave the state of gujarat without prior permission of the sessions judge concerned ..... 1. this application has been received through jail. the applicant is an under trial prisoner in connection with offence punishable under section 25(1(ib)(a) of the arms act. he seeks regular bail in connection with the f.i.r. being c.r. no.ii-27/2008 registered at kadi police station.2. learned a.p.p. submitted that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Feb-03-2011
..... petitioners for various offences namely, sections 147, 148, 307, 326, 337, 504, 451 of the ipc as also section 429 of the ipc and section 135 of the bombay police act. sessions court however, while framing charge did not include section 149 of ipc against accused though said provision was included in the charge-sheet. trial was conducted. evidence was recorded ..... the opinion that learned judge committed no error in adding charge under section 149 of the ipc which in essence makes all members of an unlawful assembly equally responsible for acts done by others. at this stage of framing of charges, there was in my opinion sufficient material to sustain the order passed by the trial court. it is true that .....
Tag this Judgment!