Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: allahabad Page 9 of about 16,340 results (0.053 seconds)

Feb 04 1999 (HC)

Commander K.K. Gulati and Others Vs. Shalini Memorial Society and Scho ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1085

..... the shalini memorial society and school. dehra dun, respondent no. 1 on 25.1.1973. the landlords filed an application for release of the building in question in the year 1982 under section 21 (1) (a) of the act on the ground that they require it bona fide ..... (regulation of letting, rentand eviction) act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the act). the reference as to the parties in this judgment shall relate to writ petition no. 45968 of 1993. 2. briefly stated the facts arising out of these writ petitions are that the petitioners are landlords of house no. 5, arjun road (nehru road), dehra dun. the disputed house was allotted to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1977 (HC)

Naresh Chandra Agarwal and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1978CriLJ546

..... had been filed by the special police establishment constituted under the delhi special police establishment act, _1946. another local area or zone consisted of dehra dub and some other districts and sri. moolchand, addl. chief judicial magistrate dehra dun is to exercise jurisdiction with regard to offences committed in those districts. sri. raizada has ..... uttar pradesh in which investigations are made or the charge-sheets are filed by the special police establishment constituted under the delhi special police establishment act, 1946 (act no, xxv of 1946). the notification dated 7th may 1974 was modified by the high court by the subsequent notification no. 124 dated june ..... r, k. rai chief judicial magistrate, lucknow to try cases investigated by the delhi special police establishment constituted under the delhi special police establishment act, 1946 (act no. xxv of 1946) in respect of the offences committed in the whole of the state of uttar pradesh. this notification was on the basis .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 1952 (HC)

Nem Chand Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1953All99

..... convenience would be in favour of having the case tried at saharanpur, because there are only six prosecution witnesses, four of whom come from saharanpur and the neighbouring district of dehra dun; whereas all the sixteen defence witnesses come from the district of saharanpur. the second ground taken is that the same learned magistrate has already decided another case against the applicant ..... judges sitting at lucknow. the main facts which have to be considered in this connection are that the case which is pending before the learned special magistrate relates to all acts which were committed in saharanpur district, so that the offence which is the subject-matter of the charge to be tried by the special magistrate was committed in the district .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 1949 (PC)

Sir Iqbal Ahmad Vs. Rex

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1950All162

..... of the political changes introduced by that act. the question whether a court could go into the question whether any particular adaptation made by the governor-general in exercise of that power was or was not necessary was considered in the case of sir gulab singh v. dist. magistrate of dehra dun : air1950all11 by a full bench of ..... to various matters. it would be unreasonable to contend that those provisions are ultra vires the powers given to the governor-general by section 229, government of india act, and i can see nothing illegal in the delegation of the power upon the chief justice by the further proviso added to article 8, amalgamation order, to ..... were amalgamated with effect from 26th july 1948 by the united province high courts amalgamation order, 1948, promulgated by the governor. general under section 229, government of india act. article 8 of the order runs as follows :'(1) the new high court shall have the like powers to approve, admit, enrol, remove and suspend advocates and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 2003 (HC)

Smt. Basanti Devi and ors. Vs. Ixth A.D.J. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC3365

..... o.s. no. 365 of 1995. on 11.12.1996, a mukhtar nama khas is alleged to have been given by raja amar pratap in favour of atiqur-rehman at dehra dun at the address given in the plaint. on 20.1,1997, when the respondent did not put in appearance in court even after personal service, the civil judge (sr. division ..... of rs. 50,000 by him.6. on 20.9.1997, atiqur rehman moved an application of restoration of the case along with an application under section 5 of limitation act with his affidavit. the petitioner filed his objection on 15.10.1997 to the aforesaid application and affidavit stating that the inter alia grounds for restoration were false. the civil .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1969 (HC)

R.R. Engineering Co. Vs. Zila Parishad, Bareilly and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1970All316

..... government of india act, 1935 by reason of the provisions of section 143, clause (2) of that act read with the seventh schedule. list i, item 54.'27. the view adopted ..... , provided that it was lawfully levied prior to the commencement of the constitution. the act was valid when it was enacted in 1922 when there was no division of powers between the centre and the provinces, as was held in district board, dehra dun v. h. trotter : air1939all389 . it continued to be valid even under the ..... disputed that prior to the commencement of the constitution and even after such commencement but before the enactment of kshettra samities and zila parishads act 1961, the u.p. district boards act (act x of 1922) applied to the district of bareilly and the rules framed thereunder permitted the imposition of a tax on circumstances and property .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 1938 (PC)

Damodar Das Vs. Secretary of State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1939All106

..... was not such a person. this ruling was followed in crown brewery, mussoorie v. collector of dehra dun (1897) 19 all. 339 at page 341. mr. banerji, thinks that though the ruling held that such cases do come under the land acquisition act, where the government claims, that the land belongs to it, some further distinction can be established ..... that he spent rs. 5000. it has been argued by mr. p.l. banerji that the present case could not have been brought under the land acquisition act because that act deals only with the acquisition of land, and that here the secretary of state claims the land as owned by him, and applies asking for compensation to be ..... was imdad ali v. collector of farakhabad (1885) 7 all. 817 where it was held that there was no jurisdiction for the district judge under the land acquisition act, where the collector claimed the-land as belonging to government, because section 15 contemplated a dispute between persons who appeared in response to a notice under section 9, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 1962 (HC)

Mrs. Panzy Fernandas Vs. Mrs. M.F. Queoros and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1963All153

..... of civil procedure could only be passed in a proceeding which could be termed as a 'suit'.the learned counsel also cited the case of hansraj gupta v. dehra dun-mussoorie electric tramway co., ltd. , in which it was observed that a suit was ordinarily instituted by the presentation of a plaint. the learned counsel contended ..... ilr 16 bom 408 it is held that a second appeal from an order rejecting an application for execution of a partition decree under the gujarat talukdar's act (bombay act vi of 1888) is not within the contemplation of article no. i of schedule i, but is an application falling under article no. i of ..... vi) ..................(vii) ..................(a)when thevalue of the suit or appeal for pur-poses of juris-diction does not exceedone thou-sand rupees;twentyfive rupeesevery othersuit notprovided forby this act.(b)when such value exceeds one thousand rupees, but does not exceed five thou-sand rupees; fifty rupees(c)whensuch value exceeds five thousand rupees, but does not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 1933 (PC)

Harnandan Prasad Vs. B. Kamta Prasad Kakkar and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1934All376

..... and the passage quoted shows that he wrote what he was directed to say. and the provisions of section 91, evidence act, would also prevent evidence intended to vary the terms of the letter. the respondents relies on dehra dun mussoorie electric tramway co. v. jagmandar das : air1932all141 . under clause 37 of the dehradun mussoorie tramway, order 1921, it ..... the plaintiff was not duly elected as the chairman of the municipal board. for deciding this question we are confined to the provisions of the united provinces municipalities act (act 2 of 1916). it is not really necessary to rely on english authorities on the common law rules-applicable to parliamentary elections. they can serve only as a ..... of the votes of the members present and voting.25. the same considerations will apply to section 92(1), as apply to the english act. like the english act the u.p. act and the rules under it provide for the election of members of the board to be by the majority of the votes. but the election .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1931 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Bahadur Singh

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1932All58; 136Ind.Cas.373

sulaiman, j.1. this is a reference by the district magistrate of dehra dun recommending that proceedings may be ordered against the sureties for the accused. he was proceeded against under section 109, criminal p.c. two persons stood sureties for him for his ..... though there was some delay.2. so far as this last matter is concerned, we agree with the district magistrate that if the bond was forfeited on account of any act of the accused person within the period for which the sureties had bound themselves, they would be liable whether the proceedings were started against them before or after the expiry .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //