Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: allahabad Page 8 of about 16,340 results (0.042 seconds)

Sep 23 1955 (HC)

B.N. Khosla Vs. S.L. Nayar

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1956All131

..... court.the learned judge did not consider at all the applicability of the displaced persons (institution of suits) act of 1947. under section 4(ii) of this act the plaintiff was entitled to bring the suit at dehra dun because the cause of action had arisen only at lahore, which is now situate in the west pakistan.2. learned ..... of a house of which the plaintiff was the owner and the opposite party was the tenant. both the parties have come from the punjab. the plaintiff resides in dehra dun while the opposite party resides at jullundhar. the suit was filed in the court of small causes and has been dismissed on account of want of jurisdiction in that ..... counsel for the opposite party relied on section 4 clause (ii) of the act and urged that the suit related to an immovable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1966 (HC)

Balley Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1967All341

..... the petitioners that it has been admitted in para 19 of the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents that in certain areas of tehri garhwal and dehra dun districts in uttar pradesh, the cultivation of the poppy is permitted for purposes of seeds only and capsules are not allowed to be laced. it is ..... challenge the constitutional vires of the opium act (act xiii of 1857) whereunder the respondents have completely banned the cultivation of poppy in pargana jaunsar bawar in the district of dehradun.2. the petitioners state that they are the residents of pargana jaunsar bawar. tehsil chakrata district dehra dun and carry oh the occupation of agricultural ..... of poppy is altogether illegal on compassionate grounds the law has not been enforced strictly in this area, but nonetheless the petitioners in cultivating poppy committed illegal acts.7. the action of the excise staff in uprooting poppy plants was with the authority of the law and justified on facts. the petitioners' claim that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 1965 (HC)

Sardar Surendra Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1966All455

..... r. t. a. it reads:--'to consider the question of offering alternative routes under section 68-g (2) of the m. v. act 1939 in lieu of compensation to the following displaced operators of hardwar-rishikesh-lachhmanjhoola-dehra dun-rishikesh and dehra dun-narendra nagar routes, whose stage carriage permits have been cancelled or their renewal refused as a result of publication of the approved ..... scheme under section 68-d in respect of those routes............'sections 68-a (2) and 68-g fall in chap. iv-a of the act which was introduced by means of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 1977 (HC)

Smt. Pari Bai and ors. Vs. Bhagat Ram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1977All549

..... the appellants was to file a suit for damages against the respondents. it was in march 1967 that the claims tribunal was created for deciding the cases in dehra dun. the position, however, was not very clear at that time whether an application in respect of an accident occurring before the creation or constitution of claims ..... an application for compensation under section 110-a of the motor vehicles act, they were advised to file a regular suit in the civil court on 1st april, 1968. the suit was ..... under article 82 of the limitation act, 1963, within two years of the occurrence of the accident. but, in the meantime, the government of u. p, constituted the claims tribunal by a notification published in the gazette dated 7th march, 1967. despite the fact that a tribunal had been constituted at dehra dun. where the appellants could file .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 1960 (HC)

Smt. Champa Devi L. Rameshwar Pd. Vs. Jairam Das Banu Mal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1960All615

..... authorised by law. his election must. therefore, be set aside.11. i, therefore, allow this revision with costs and remand the case to the additional civil judge, dehra dun to decide the claim of champa devi on merits in accordance with the procedure prescribed under order 38 rule 8 read with order 21 rules 58 to 61 c. ..... it is therefore abundantly clear that all that the judicial committee held in mohamad siddique yusuf's case was that in a case under the presidency towns insolvency act, when the act of insolvency upon which an order of adjudication is founded is a transfer amounting to a fraudulent preference, the transforce cannot so long as the order of ..... transfer is declared automatically void by the insolvency court at the time of adjudication but also where the official receiver applies under section 53 of the provincial insolvency act for avoidance of a deed of transfer. the learned judge was of the opinion that the order of adjudication is conclusive, and the remedy of an aggrieved .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1984 (HC)

Mansa Ram and Sons (Bankers) and ors. Vs. Janki Dass Om Prakash and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1984All267

..... under section 75(2) of the provincial insolvency act, 1920 (hereinafter referred to as the act) directed against the order of the insolvency judge, dehra dun, dated april 22, 1976.2. respondent nos. 1 and 2 presented the petition giving rise to this appeal as creditors under section 9(1) of the act on july 20, 1971. appellant no. 1 ..... firm. the deposits were acknowledged from time to time. respondent no. 2 made demand of the amount due under these deposits in the month of july. 1971 at dehra dun, but the appellants nos. 2, 4 and sri mander dass deceased, the managing partners of the firm, mnnsa ram & sons, expressed inability to pay. the payment ..... the requisite conditions being satisfied. the respondents before the insolvency judge were found to be creditors and it was also found that the appellants had committed an act of insolvency inasmuch as the immovable properties had been sold in execution of a decree within three months immediately preceding the petition. respondent no. 3 was also .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1965 (HC)

Smt. Sheela Devi Kukreti Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Lucknow.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1966]60ITR774(All)

..... by the assessee from the working scheme all over his forests. thereupon, a complaint was lodged by the range officer, private forests, dehra dun, under section 15 of the u.p.private forests act (act vi of 1949) on the ground that the assessee had made heavy deviations from working scheme of dobri bakama forests, etc., after september ..... 27, 1949, without any lawful authority. this complaint was tried by the judicial officer, dehra dun, who by his order dated january 16, 1951, acquited ..... of reaching that result closed accounts could be reopened. whether this principle is justified in the english law, it has no place under the indian income-tax act...nor is the question of reopening of accounts relevant in the matter of ascertaining when a particular income accrued or arose.'in commissioner of income-tax v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1963 (HC)

Har Sarup and anr. Vs. Brij Bhushan Saran and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1964All340

pathak, j.1. this is an appeal under the representation of the people act against an order of the election tribunal bijnor dismissing an election petition.2. of a number of candidates for election to the u. p. legislative assembly from the dehra dun city constituency, the first respondent brij bhushan sharma was declared elected. his election was ..... katuri vaid, who is also president of city congress committee with the consent and connivance of respondent no. 1 threatened on the 15th february, 1962, at dharampur, dehra dun, one sri jai lal khandelwal, an elector that his bones would be broken if he did not cast his vote for respondent no. 1 and also did ..... to in section 123(2) is clearly indicated in this allegation.that provision reads '123. the following shall be deemed to be corrupt practice for the purposes of this act : (1) ........................ (2) undue influence, that is to say, any direct or indirect interference or attempt to interfere on the part of the candidate or his agent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 1934 (PC)

Ch. Rajender Singh Vs. Uma Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1935All117; 159Ind.Cas.193

..... as may be claimed.4. the question for consideration before us is whether the issuing of this notice amounted to a contempt of the subordinate judge of dehra dun. jurisdiction to punish for contempt of subordinate courts undoubtedly vests in this court, and has mot been challenged by learned counsel. apart from there being inherent ..... court. it is a novel proposition that even though the sending of the notice amounted to contempt, the counsel who sent it is protected because he was acting as counsel. a counsel's capacity is not inviolable, and his privileges cannot possibly extend to interference with the administration of justice. counsel are expected to ..... the defendant's guardian, but actually drafted the notice himself, which contained his own words, and sent the same under his own signature, although he was acting on behalf of the plaintiff. the threat having been made under the signature of a counsel and addressed to a layman was particularly serious. in these circumstances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 13 1958 (HC)

Smt. Prem Vs. District Magistrate, Meerut and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1959All206; 1959CriLJ286

..... and thereafter sent to a women's protective home at rajpur in the town of dehra dun. the petitioner further alleges that the police purported to act under sections 16 and 17 of the suppression of immoral traffic in women and girls act, 1956 (act no. 104 of 1956) which was passed by the central government and which came ..... receipt of this report and before further enquiry could be completed the magistrate thought it desirable to have the petitioner shifted to the girls' protection home at dehra dun where apparently she is now residing.5. from the affidavit of the magistrate it is perfectly clear that the petitioner was not arrested by any police officer ..... is further clear that the petitioner is now suffering detention for enabling a proper enquiry to be conducted as contemplated by the provisions of the above-mentioned act.6. the two points of fact mentioned above having been clearly established, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that even on these facts the petitioner's detention .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //