Defendant - Judgment Search Results

O.Nagendran Defendant Vs. Arulmigu Meenakshi

Court: Chennai

1. The Appellant/Second Defendant has focused the present Second Appeal before this Court as against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.12.2005 in

…appellant/Defendant Vs. Duncan International (i) Limited

Court: Kolkata

2008. As facts and issues arising in all these suits are common, the appeals preferred by the appellant/original defendant and the cross objection filed by the respondent/original plaintiff are being disposed of by this common judgment and

Defendant No.2 Is in Revision Under Article 227 of the Vs. Kewal Singh ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.J.S.Brar, Advocate for the Petitioner/defendant no.2. Mr.Surinder Garg, Advocate for respondents/plaintiff. *** JASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL) Defendant no.2 is in revision under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 12.10.2012 passed by the

“ That the Defendant Alleged Sale Deed Dated Vs. Gurtej Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

fabricated document and is liable to be set aside.” Para no.4 (a) be also added: “ That the defendant alleged sale deed dated 20.04.1998 in his favour. The alleged sale deed dated 20.04.1998 is a forged and

The Defendant with Intent to Obstruct or Delay the Vs. Smt. Sabra and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

money paid by the petitioner stood be forfeited. Order 38 Rule 5 CPC reads ad under: “ Where defendant may be called upon to furnish security for production of property.-(1) Where, at any stage of a Rani

Petitioner/Defendant No.2 Is in Revision Under Article 227 of the Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

been closed by order. From the paper book it is apparent that the respondent no.1/plaintiff stood guarantor for defendant no.1 and defendant no.2- petitioner towards liability of a loan raised from a Finance company for purchase of

“defendant No.1 Exparte Vide Order Dated Vs. Chamel Singh and Others ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

No.4160 of 2014 This revision is directed against the order dated 26.5.2014 by which application filed by the defendants for recalling the plaintiff's witness for cross examination has been declined. Counsel for the petitioneRs.by way of the

Sarojini Das Vs. Haridas Ghosh-defendant

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1922Cal12,66Ind.Cas.774

Matched in: Parties Sarojini Das Vs. Haridas Ghosh-defendant

Vs. India Steam Laundry(P) Ltd.Defendant/Re

Court: Kolkata

CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE CASE No.CA/563 of 2013 PRASANTA KUMAR MITRA AND ORS. Plaintiff/Petitioner/Appeallant Versus INDIA STEAM LAUNDRY(P) LTD. Defendant/Respondent For Petitioner : For Respondent : Judgement Date :22. 03/2017 BEFORE : Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE In the

Ram Chandra Prasad Defendant Vs Smt. Mina Devi Plaintiff

Court: Patna

1.The defendant has filed this first appeal against the judgment Sahoo, J. and decree dated 26.9.2006 passed by Sri Radheyshyam