Decide - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: decide Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 18,177 results (0.08 seconds)Shri Arokiaraj Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Apr-12-2004
Reported in: (2004)(168)ELT336Tri(Chennai)
..... office order in 1998 cases involving identical issue are being decided by single member bench by various co ordinate benches of ..... the prevailing practice in the tribunal and inspite of having decided identical matters by single member bench and having remained silent ..... the tribunal more particularly when identical issues have already been decided by the single member bench on more than one occasion .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPoul Cyril Parmar Vs. District Education Officer
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-01-2004
Reported in: (2004)2GLR482
..... and the general stay continued till january 1988 and while deciding and dismissing these petitions finally in january 1988 the supreme ..... institutions themselves will not be in order therefore it was decided by the central board of trustees in consultation with the ..... educational institutions and establishments those cases came to be finally decided by judgment dated 20th january 1988 the division bench .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India Vs. Kamrup Industrial Gases Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-29-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)ARBLR618(Cal),(2004)3CALLT179(HC)
..... may be within its jurisdiction and indeed essential for him to decide the question incidentally but where a specific question of law ..... reasonable the arbitrator is a tribunal selected by the parties to decide the dispute according to law this principle was enumerated by ..... on the face of the award would be admissible to decide whether the arbitrator traveled outside the bounds of the contract .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPpn Power Generating Company Limited Rep. by Its Managing Director Mr. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-08-2004
Reported in: 2005(3)ARBLR354(Madras); [2006]129CompCas849(Mad); 2004(5)CTC1; (2004)4MLJ434
..... satisfied should the court proceed to consider all the facts and circumstances in order to decide whether an injunction is proper in this analysis considerations of international comity must be given ..... the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant company cannot be taken into consideration to decide the issue in question for want of pleadings 73 we therefore find ourselves in agreement .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPpn Power Generating Company Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director Mr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-08-2004
Reported in: [2005]59SCL27(Mad)
..... satisfied should the court proceed to consider all the facts and circumstances in order to decide whether an injunction is proper in this analysis considerations of international comity must be given ..... the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant company cannot be taken into consideration to decide the issue in question for want of pleadings 73 we therefore find ourselves in agreement .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Jeya Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by the Joint Secretary (Revenue ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-16-2004
Reported in: AIR2005Mad116
..... issued the following clarification subsequent to the landmark judgment of the supreme court as to deciding the social status of scheduled caste schedule tribe persons of origin and migrated many ..... government clarified that the residential status of the father may be taken into consideration for deciding the origin migrant status of the children that the respondents administration issued an order .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Construction Co. Limited Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, R ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-04-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)ARBLR41(Madras); 2004(4)CTC401; (2004)4MLJ260
..... extension of time was granted by the engineer he has not decided the actual compensation payable to the appellant contractor which decision ..... the arbitrator is a tribunal selected by the parties to decide the disputes according to law in the abovesaid decision principles ..... is without jurisdiction and as such the learned judge has decided the matter in accordance with law since the jurisdiction of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Chandrawali and ors. Vs. Narender and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-29-2004
Reported in: AIR2005Raj137
..... 20th july 2000 and thereafter if occasion arises the trial court will decide the applications under order 6 rule 17 cpc afresh 8 thereafter ..... the suit filed on 20th nov 1995 to be within limitation and decided issue no 8 in favour of the plaintiffs 9 learned counsel ..... the matter be remanded back to the learned trial court to decide issue no 8 afresh after a comprehensive reading and construction of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmi Chand Sharma Vs. Sushil Kumar
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-08-2004
Reported in: RLW2005(1)Raj191; 2005(1)WLC64
..... shop in question was not found reasonable and bonafide and thus the learned trial judge decided issue no 5 pertaining to reasonable and bonafide necessity against the plaintiff respondent ii that ..... pertaining to comparative hardship therefore in these circumstances if the learned trial judge had not decided issue no 6 pertaining to comparative hardship he has committed no illegality or infirmity in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBarji (Smt.) and ors. Vs. Thakurji Shri Dwarkadheesji and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-10-2004
Reported in: RLW2004(4)Raj2068; 2004(3)WLC732
..... none appeared for the state 13 the trial court vide judgment dated 3 8 1992 decided issues relating to material alteration denial of title reasonable and bonafide requirement against the plaintiff ..... issue of default was decided in plaintiff s favour but benefit of the first default was given to the defendants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial