Court : Supreme Court of India
..... if i kill vrtrasura, another brahmana, how shall i free myself from the sinful reactions?. 7 also, in the qur an, chapter 2, verse 222 states as follows: 222. they also ask you about (the injunctions concerning) menstruation. say: it is a state of hurt ..... ratilal ), where a constitution bench of this court considered the constitutionality of the bombay public trusts act, 1950. the act sought to regulate and make provisions for the administration of public and religious trusts in the state of bombay. the petitioners challenged the validity of the act on the grounds that it interfered with their freedom of conscience, their right to freely ..... . and ors., (1997) 4 scc606 ( sri adi visheshwara ), this court upheld the constitutional validity of the uttar pradesh sri kashi vishwanath temple act, 1983. in so doing, they referred to the tests of a religious denomination laid down in the previous judgments of this court, and then held: 33. thus ..... processions or gatherings at public places but only prohibited carrying of daggers, trishuls and skulls which posed danger to public order and morality.120. in n. adithayan v. travancore devaswom board and others37, the court very succinctly laid down ..... section 2(3) of the united provinces entertainment and betting tax act, 1937 which provided that entertainment includes any exhibitional performance, amusement, game or sport to which persons are admitted for payment , would include video shows which were being played on video machines at the premises .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... this act and in such manner as may be specified by the regulations. when an act or regulation regulates and controls sharing of the information, the provision is regulatory and has been engrafted to protect individual's privacy right. the aadhaar (sharing of information) regulations, 2016 again contains in chapter ii restrictions on sharing of identity information. regulation 3 is restriction on authority. regulation 4 is restriction on requesting entity. regulation 5 ..... complexity. it is hence necessary that the criminal law must be supplemented by an independent regulatory framework. in its absence, there is a grave danger that the regime of data protection, as well as the administration of criminal justice will be rendered dysfunctional. unfortunately, a regulatory framework of the nature referred to above is completely absent. uidai which is established and controlled ..... 147-148, available at http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_32858-1522-1-30.pdf?.121123115540 368 census act case, (1983) 280 part h in reaching decisions, one no longer has to rely on manually collected registries and files. today, the technical means of ..... points to the construction of a new notion of the individual, through big data streams and measures of self-quantification. it offers us a techno-social framework where the machine function of identification is wedded to the human expression of identity, and thus offers an inroad into looking at what happens when our identities are mediated, mitigated, facilitated .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.558 OF2012Kalpana Mehta and others Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India and others Respondent(s) WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.921 OF2013JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, CJI. [For himself and A.M. Khanwilkar, J.]. I N D E X Heading Page No.S. No.A. Introduction B. The factual background B.1 The Reference C. Contentions of the petitioners D. Contentions of the respondents E. Supremacy of the Constitution F. Constitutional limitations upon the legislature 3 4 6 8 12 14 17 2 G. Doctrine of separation of powers H. Power of judicial review I. Interpretation of the Constitution The nature of duty cast upon this Court I.1 Interpretation of fundamental rights I.2 Interpretation constitutional provisions of other J.K. A perspective on the role of Parliamentary Committees International position of Parliamentary Committees K.1 Parliamentary Committees in 21 28 34 40 42 48 54 54 England K.2 Parliamentary Committee...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.7875-7879 OF2015BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA A.K. BALAJI AND ORS. APPELLANT VERSUS WITH ...RESPONDENTS (Association of Indian Lawyers versus M/s. London Court of CIVIL APPEAL NO.7170 OF2015International Arbitration (LCIA) and ors.) AND CIVIL APPEAL No.8028 OF2015(Global Indian Lawyers versus Bar Council of India & Ors.) JUDGMENT ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J1 The issue involved in this batch of matters is whether foreign law firms/lawyers are permitted to practice in India. Reference needs to be made to two leading matters. Civil Appeal Nos.7875-79 of 2015 have been filed by the Bar Council of India against the Judgment of Madras High Court dated 21st February, 2012 in A.K. Balaji versus The Government of India1. Civil Appeal No.8028 of 2015 has 1 AIR2012Mad 124 1 been filed by Global Indian Lawyers against the judgment of Bombay High Court dated 16th December, 2009 in Lawyers Collective versus Bar Council of India2....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... administration by a physician of medications or substances to an end-of-life patient, at the patient s request, in order to relieve their suffering by hastening death. in order to be able to access medical aid in dying under the quebec act, a patient must:- (1) be an insured person within the meaning of the health insurance act (chapter a-29); (2 ..... fact that the interference is often viewed as trespassing on the private and personal sphere adding to the vigour of the debate. however, even where the conduct poses a danger to health or, arguably, where it is of a life-threatening nature, the case-law of the convention institutions has regarded the state's imposition of compulsory or ..... of antibiotics in case of a patient where death is likely to occur as a result of not giving the said antibiotics or removal of the heart lung machine from a patient in coma. the two-judge bench has also observed that the legal position across the world seems to be that ..... priorities of canadians . the special joint committee released its report in february 2016 recommending a legislative framework which would regulate medical assistance in dying by imposing both substantive and procedural safeguards, namely:- substantive safeguards:102. a grievous and irremediable medical condition ..... opportunity for unfolding personality, rising to higher status, moving to fresh woods and reaching out to reality which 47 (1983) 1 scc12448 (1978) 1 scc248130 makes our earthly journey a true fulfilment not a tale told by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2453 OF2007The State of Karnataka by its Chief Secretary Versus Appellant(s) State of Tamil Nadu by its Chief Secretary & Ors. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.2454 of 2007 State of Kerala through the Chief Secretary to Government State of Tamil Nadu through the Chief Secretary Respondent(s) to Government and others Appellant(s) Versus CIVIL APPEAL No.2456 OF2007State of Tamil Nadu through the Secretary Public Works Department State of Karnataka by its Chief Secretary Government of Karnataka & Ors. Versus ...Appellant(s) Respondent(s) Dipak Misra, CJI S. No.2 JUDGMENT I N D E X Heading Page No.A. The proceedings in this Court in the present 6 Appeals B. Maintainability of the Appeals by Special 18 Leave C. Stand of all parties pertaining to remand of the matter to the Tribunal after deliberation of the legal issues D. Reference of the dispute to the Tribunal E. The initial proceedings before the T...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.20982 OF2017INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...APPELLANT (S) SHAILENDRA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.& ORS. VERSUS WITH ...RESPONDENT (S) SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.10742 OF2008YOGESH KUMAR & ORS. ...PETITIONER (S) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. ...RESPONDENT (S) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.20920 OF2011SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)Nos.26574-26575 OF2011SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)No.28993 OF2011SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)No.30198 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)No.30192 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)No.30142 OF20151 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)No.30128 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)No.30203 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL No.4835 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)No.25289 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)CC No.9842 OF2016SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.22356 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.31678 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4836 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.22527 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.4705 OF2016SPECI...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4741 OF2007Karnataka Live Band Restaurants Association .Appellant(s) VERSUS State of Karnataka & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 19.04.2007 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Writ Appeal No.556 of 2007 (GM-POLICE) whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein praying for setting aside the order 1 dated 09.02.2007 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court in Writ Petition No.27523 of 2005.2) In order to appreciate the controversy involved in the appeal, it is necessary to set out the facts infra in detail including the background facts, which led to filing of this appeal.3) The appellant is the Association registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 and Rules framed thereunder. The Association is formed by the persons, who are engaged in the busi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.67 OF2017NIKESH TARACHAND SHAH PETITIONER UNION OF INDIA & ANR. RESPONDENTS VERSUS WITH WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.103 OF2017WITH WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.144 OF2017WITH WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.152 OF2017WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2012 OF2017(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL) NO.7326 OF2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2013 OF2017(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL) NO.7786 OF2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2014 OF2017(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL) NO.7789 OF2017 1 JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. Leave granted.2. The present writ petitions and appeals raise the question of the constitutional validity of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Section 45(1) imposes two conditions for grant of bail where an offence punishable for a term of imprisonment of more than 3 years under Part A of the Schedule to the Act is involved. The conditions are that the Public Prosecutor must be given an oppo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO494OF2012JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD.), AND ANR. ..Petitioners VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..Respondents WITH T.C. (CIVIL) NO151OF2013T.C. (CIVIL) NO152OF2013W.P.(CIVIL) NO833OF2013W.P.(CIVIL) NO829OF2013W.P.(CIVIL) NO932OF2013CONMT. PET. (CIVIL) NO144OF2014IN W.P.(C) No.494/2012 T.P.(CIVIL) NO313OF2014T.P.(CIVIL) NO312OF2014S.L.P(CRL.) NO.2524/2014 W.P.(CIVIL) NO.37/2015 W.P.(CIVIL) NO.220/2015 1 CONMT. PET. (C)NO.674/2015 IN W.P.(C) NO.829/2013 T.P.(CIVIL)NO.921/2015 CONMT.PET.(C)NO.470/2015 IN W.P.(C) NO.494/2012 CONMT.PET.(C)NO.444/2016 IN W.P.(C) NO.494/2012 CONMT.PET.(C)NO.608/2016 IN W.P.(C) NO.494/2012 W.P.(CIVIL) NO.797/2016 CONMT.PET.(C)NO.844/2017 IN W.P.(C) NO.494/2012 W.P. (C) No.342/ 2017 AND WITH W.P.(C) NO.000372/2017 JUDGMENT Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are : A The reference B Decision in M P Sharma C D E F...
Tag this Judgment!