Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dangerous machines regulation act 1983 chapter ii administration of the act Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 2020 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.177 seconds)

Jul 14 2020 (SC)

Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-14-2020

..... scr187 at 193. 57 aphorisms, injunctions, is understood to disclaim, as it does in its general compelling impossibilities, and the administration of laws must adopt that general exception in the consideration of all particular cases. intention of all 7. in this case indisputably during ..... capacity to hack, corrupt, or alter information, in manner which is undetectable. we do not underestimate these dangers. however the current provisions of section 5 do not afford any protection and it is not possible to ..... act, 1872 (hereinafter evidence act ) (ii) 84 how even with the existing rules of procedure, the courts fared well, without any legislative interference, while dealing with evidence in analogue form, and (iii) how after machines in analogue form gave way to machines ..... in the custody of the court, that is to say, 28-1-1978 till the return of the award to the arbitrators on 24-11-1983, arbitrators or the parties could not have presented the award for its registration during that time. the award as we have ..... documents stricto sensu are admitted as material evidence. with the amendment to the evidence act in 2000, sections 65-a and 65-b were introduced into chapter v relating to documentary evidence. section 65-a provides that contents of electronic records ..... (1) the matters referred to in subsection 31.2(2) and sections 31.3 and 31.5 and in regulations made under section 31.4 may be established by affidavit. cross examination (2) a party may cross examine a deponent of an affidavit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2020 (SC)

Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-06-2020

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION S.L.P. (C) NOS.9036-9038 OF2016 INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VERSUS .PETITIONER MANOHARLAL & ORS. ETC. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH S.L.P.(C) NOS. 9798-9799 OF2016 S.L.P.(C) NOS. 17088-17089 OF2016 S.L.P.(C) No.37375 OF2016 S.L.P.(C) No.37372 OF2016 S.L.P.(C) NOS. 16573-16605 OF2016 S.L.P. (C) CC No.15967 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL No.19356 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19362 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19361 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19358 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19357 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19360 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19359 OF2017S.L.P.(C) NOS. 34752-34753 OF2016 S.L.P.(C) No.15890 OF2017 2 CIVIL APPEAL No.19363 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19364 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.19412 OF2017MA1423OF2017IN CIVIL APPEAL No.12247 OF2016S.L.P.(C) No.33022 OF2017S.L.P.(C) No.33127 OF2017S.L.P.(C) No.33114 OF2017MA1787OF2017IN CIVIL APPEAL No.10210 OF2016MA1786OF2017IN CIVIL APPEAL No.10207 OF2016MA45OF2018IN CIVIL APPEAL No.6239 OF2017S.L.P.(C) No.16051 OF2019DIARY No.2384...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //