Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter x cereals Page 6 of about 2,221 results (0.167 seconds)

Mohd. Riyazur Rehman Siddiqui Vs. Deputy Director of Health Services

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009ACJ585; 2008(6)MhLj941

..... learned single judge dated 13th february 1992, held that the letters patent appeal would be maintainable as it was filed prior to coming into force of the amending act of 2002 act. the supreme court also noticed the judgments in the case of kamal kumar dutta (supra) and subal paul (supra). the main contention in these cases ..... on 30th december 1999, it was not enforced because of various factors. clause (b) of section 100a was subsequently deleted finally and as already noticed, by the amending act of 2002, present section 100a was introduced. present section 100a reads as under:13. section 100a. notwithstanding anything contained in any letters patent for any high court ..... an ambiguity or the plain meaning of the words used in the statute would be self defeating.recently, again supreme court in grasim industries ltd. v. collector of customs, bombay : 2002(141)elt593(sc) has followed the same principle and observed:where the words are clear and there is no obscurity, and there is no .....

Dr. Mohammad Tahir Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2004)2UPLBEC1406

..... court under section 55. section 100 of the code of civil procedure was substituted by a new section by section 37 of the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1976 with effect from 1st february, 1977, and the new section 100 provides that a second appeal shall lie to the high court only if the high ..... on the market rate prevalent in the year the declaration analogous to section 6 of the land acquisition act, 1894 were issued.54. in collector of customs, madras (supra), section 23-a of the foreign exchange regulation act as amended in 1952 provided that the restriction imposed in section 8 thereto shall be deemed to have been imposed ..... under section 19 of the sea customs act, 1878 and all provisions of the act shall have effect accordingly. a contention was raised that the sea customs act was incorporated and that, therefore, the .....

Sandvik Asia Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-i, Pune and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1223; 2006(4)BomCR886; 2006(1)CTC741; (2006)200CTR(SC)505; 2006(196)ELT257(SC); [2006]280ITR643(SC); JT2006(2)SC7; (2006)2MLJ25(SC); 2006(1)SCALE569; (2006)2SCC508

..... the amount, if any, of the tax paid in excess of the tax chargeable on the total income returned by the assessee.]7. inserted by the direct tax laws (amendment) act, 1987, w.e.f. 1.4.1989.11) the high court erred in purporting to distinguish this court's decision in narendra doshi's case and, in particular, ..... .3. in order to attain uniformity and to regulate such refunds it is clarified that refund applications under section 11b(1) of the central excise act, 1944 or under section 27(1) of the customs act, 1962 need not be insisted upon. a simple letter from the person who has made such deposit, requesting the return of the amount, along ..... attested xerox copy of the challan in form tr6 evidencing the payment of the amount of such deposit, addressed to the concerned assistant/deputy commissioner of central excise or customs, as the case may be, will suffice for the purpose. all pending refund applications already made under the relevant provisions of the indirect tax enactments for return of .....

R.C. Poudyal and ors. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1993SC1804; JT1993(2)SC1; 1993(1)SCALE489; 1994Supp(1)SCC324; [1993]1SCR891

..... response to these questions, it is urged, is judicial restraint.42. the validity of clause (0 of article 371f introduced by the constitution (36th amendment) act, 1975 is assailed on the ground that the said clause provides for a reservation which violates 'one person one vote' rule which is essential to democracy ..... bizarremethods for decision on the accusation. without any regard for human dignity, women accused of being possessed of witchery are burnt alive and many such customs are followed which are highly abhorrent to every concept of justice, liberty, equality and every other quality for which our civilisation stands today. if ..... , many writers implicitly refuse to acknowledge its importance.such communal attachments are what clifford geertz calls 'primordial' loyalties, which may be based on language, religion, custom, region, race, or assumed blood ties. the subcultures of the european consociationaldemocracies, which are religious and ideological in nature and on which, in two of .....

Eco Valley Farms and Foods Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court : Mumbai

..... tariff with the entries in the schedule to the customs tariff act, 1975. the said 2004 act came into force with effect from 28th february 2005. by a ..... has been accepted by the revenue and subsequent dta clearances of fresh mushrooms have been allowed without demanding excise duty equivalent to customs duty payable on imported mushrooms. 10. by the central excise tariff (amendment) act 2004 ('2004 act'), the six digit entries in the schedule to the 1985 act were rearranged into eight digit entries so as to update the entries in the central excise .....

Ms.Jairaj Ispat Limited, Rep. by Its Ma Vs. A.P. Electricity Regulator ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... permitted under the terms of any fuel surcharge formula prescribed by regulations [section 26(9) of the act of 1998]. further, the licensee had no power under the above provision to amend any tariff unless the same was approved by the commission. the electricity act, 2003 (hereinafter, 'the act of 2003') came into force from 10.06.2003. several existing laws were repealed thereby. the ..... would override the general law of limitation and therefore the appellate authority under the central excise act, 1944 had no power to condone the delay beyond the prescribed period by invoking section 5 of the limitation act, 1963. earlier, in commissioner of customs and central excise v. hongo india private limited5, the supreme court dealt with the question whether the high court had .....

The State of West Bengal Vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(SC)219; [2004]266ITR721(SC); JT2004(1)SC375; 2004(1)SCALE425; (2004)10SCC201

..... india.the statement of objects and reasons, the report of the selectcommittee as also the various amendments made therein from time to time,particularly amending act 21 of 1967, amending act 22 of 1970, amending act75 of 1976, amending act 38 of 1983 and amending act 24 of 1986 leave nomanner of doubt that the tea industry had occupied a very importantposition ..... the absence of a billof rights in the constitution of australia."(see also liverpool & london s.p. assn. ltd. (supra)in salomon v. commissioner of customs and excise [(1966) 3 all e.r.871], it was held that when the statute is in compliance with internationalconventions then it must be interpreted in conformity ..... above, may indirectly or remotely affect trade and commerce. if it be held that every law made by the legislature of a state which has repercussion on tariffs, licensing, marketing regulations, price-control etc., must have the previous sanction of the president, then the constitution in so far as it gives plenary power .....

R.C. Tobacco Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2005(102)ECC449; 2005(188)ELT129(SC); JT2005(12)SC281; (2005)7SCC725

..... majority of cases the units had not passed on the benefits granted by the exemption to their customers and had on the other hand realized the duty from their customers. the competence of parliament and state legislatures to repeal, amend or supersede an exemption notification is unquestionable. the power to do so retrospectively cannot be and is ..... had not only not passed on the benefit of exemption but had levied and retained the excise duty on the cigarettes manufactured by the petitioners for the customers of the large companies. the petitioners who were admittedly in group a have refuted this and contend that their relationship with the large cigarette companies was ..... in section 154(1) insofar as it is relevant seeks to amend notification no. 32/99 dated 8th july 1999 with effect from 8th july 1999 by excluding cigarettes falling under chapter 24 of the first schedule or the second schedule to the central excise tariff act, 1985. in other words, the exemptions available to the .....

Kamakshi Lamipack Private Limited, Rep.by Its Director Vs. the Governm ...

Court : Chennai

..... the destination of his own use; provided further that the state government shall, not later than five years from the date of commencement of the electricity (amendment) act, 2003, by regulations, provide such open access to all consumers who require a supply of electricity where the maximum power to be made available at ..... obligation cannot amount to a legitimate expectation. the legitimacy of an expectation can be inferred only if it is founded on the sanction of law or custom or an established procedure followed in regular and natural sequence. again it is distinguishable from a genuine expectation. such expectation should be justifiably legitimate and protectable ..... does not require approval of the commission. but, the relinquishment is subject to the condition that as and when the distribution licensee files a petition for tariff revision, the loss attributable to the relinquishment of cross subsidy surcharge shall not be reckoned by the commission as a revenue loss to the licensee." 9 .....

Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner (Aa) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(236)ELT425(SC); JT2009(7)SC1; 2009(4)SCALE666; 2009(3)LC1550(SC); (2009)25VST271(SC); 2009AIRSCW6376:2009(4)Scale666.

..... state government may notify a list of goods taxable at the rate of 12.5%;6. our attention has also been drawn to entry 3808 of chapter 38 of the customs tariff act based on hsn code which was applicable during the said assessment year; relevant portion whereof reads as under:3808 insecticides, rodenticides, fungicides, herbicides, anti-sprouting products and plant- ..... case where the high court should have entertained the writ petition. the impugned order is set aside accordingly and the appeal is allowed.19. the appellant may be permitted to amend the prayer portion of the writ petition.20. we, however, make it clear that we have not gone into the merit of the matter and all the contentions of ..... .12. it filed a writ petition, inter alia, contending:k. if sro no. 82/2006 seeks to amend and enhance the rate of tax on pesticides and insecticides from 4% to 12.5%, it is ultra-vires the provisions of kvat act and void and illegal. this is so, because by virtue of 6(1)(d), the entry and rate .....