Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter x cereals Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 408 results (0.250 seconds)

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by Its Managing Direc ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR1605

..... the apex court in the decisions relied upon by sr. counsel mr. m.c. narasimhan, this court has to hold that the repeal of kcca act by section 3 of the amendment act (act no. 9/2003) is contrary to the law laid down by the supreme court. in reality, the impugned action of the state government nullifies the ..... public sector. the acquisition of road transport undertakings by the state, therefore, undoubtedly served the public purpose.'without taking away the effect of the said judgments, the amended act nullifying the constitutional bench decisions of the apex court is bad in law and the impugned action is totally impermissible for the state legislature. in support of the same ..... to in the reasoning portion of the order while dealing with the relevant point on this aspect and the same is defeated by the impugned action of the amended act.ii) statement of objections are filed to these writ petitions on behalf of respondents 1,2 and 4 denying the averments of the petitions and supporting the .....

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation and Etc. Etc. Vs. Karnataka ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2005Kant205

..... the apex court in the decisions relied upon by sr. counsel mr. m. c. narasimhan, this court has to hold that the repeal of kcca act by section 3 of the amendment act (act no. 9/2003) is contrary to the law laid down by the supreme court. in reality, the impugned action of the state government nullifies the ..... public sector. the acquisition of road transport undertakings by the state, therefore, undoubtedly served the public purpose.'without taking away the effect of the said judgments, the amended act nullifying the constitutional bench decisions of the apex court is bad in law and the impugned action is totally impermissible for the state legislature. in support of the same ..... to in the reasoning portion of the order while dealing with the relevant point on this aspect and the same is defeated by the impugned action of the amended act.(ii) statement of objections are filed to these writ petitions on behalf of respondents 1, 2 and 4 denying the averments of the petitions and supporting the .....

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Sri Vikram JaIn S/O Sri Bheemraj Jain, Pro ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(170)LC236(Karnataka); 2009(244)ELT504(Kar)

..... not escape from payment of customs duty. the object with which the customs act 1962, was introduced reads as follows:the sea customs act which lays down the basic law relating to customs was enacted more than 80 years ago. it has been amended from time to time and some important amendments were made by the sea customs (amendment) act, 1955. general and comprehensive ..... . to meet these requirements, it has become necessary to revise the act.11. the said act was brought about not only to check the smuggling but also to ensure that the goods that is imported into the territory of india to which the customs tariff act are applicable suffers the duty in the hands of the importer.12. ..... the levy of, and exemption from customs duties is traceable to chapter v of customs act, 1962 section 12 of the customs act provides for levy of customs duty at such rates as may be specified under the customs tariff act, 1975 (51 of 1975), or any other law for the time being in .....

Engee Industrial Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2002LC531(Karnataka); 2004(164)ELT242(Kar)

..... by the appellant are not seaworthy and they arc admittedly for the purpose of breaking. there is a separate entry for this purpose both under the customs tariff act and central tariff act. the product actually imported is the material that can be retrieved from the ship; the structure by itself is of no value and the appellant ..... reasonably possible if we keep in mind the legislative purpose of the exemption clause. it is also relevant to notice that the entries in the customs tariff act and the central excise tariff act are different for vessels imported for use and vessels imported for breaking up. in this case, the vessels have been imported by the appellant ..... article 286 in the constitution'.the rule was again applied by the supreme court in similar context while construing the changes brought about by the constitution 46th amendment act ingoodyear india ltd. v. state of haryana - : [1991]188itr402(sc) .19. as per the rule of 'purposive construction', the parliament is presumed to .....

Ramesh Chandra Lahoti and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its Secre ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR4030; 2006(6)KarLJ102

..... the board, to propagate and publicise the matters relating marketing of agricultural produce, imparting of education in regulated marketing of agricultural produce, etc., by an amendment act no. 17 of 1980 section 111(ix)(a) came to be introduced providing to spend for general improvement of the facilities for the transport of notified ..... seller and buyer, to take steps to prevent adulteration of goods, to prevent adulteration of goods, to prevent over trading etc. by amendment act no. 17 of 1980; section 63(2)(a)(ia) came to be introduced to provide transport facilities to agricultural produce to the yard. subsequently by ..... and selling of agricultural produce and includes grading, processing, storage, transport, packaging, market information and channels of distribution. thus by amendment act no. 43 of 1976, the scope and ambit of the act 1966 is enlarged and expanded by embracing multifarious activities concerning the farmer and marketing of his agricultural produce.22. chapter xi of the .....

Bommegowda Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1992KAR3148

..... taken place since.4. as soon as the state came forward with their aforesaid counter offensive the petitioners joined in and attacked the vires of the amended act contending interalia that it was constitutionally invalid since it fell outside the legislative competence of the state legislature. it was also urged that the state having ..... the contravention, be void.(3) in this article, unless the context otherwise requires, - (a) 'law' includes any ordinances, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having in the territory of india the force of law; (b) 'laws in force' includes laws passed by a legislature or other competent authority in the territory ..... these orders can still be upheld. i must, therefore, uphold the appointments of administrators and record a finding that the appointments are in conformity with the amended act.84. now that i have literally come to the parting of ways after my sojourn with these petitions for a considerable bit of time, i still notice .....

R. Mayilvahanam S/O Ramaiah Pillai and Vs. Intelligence Officer, Narco ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4425; ILR2008KAR4166; ILR2008(4)Kar4166; 2008(4)KCCRSN251; 2008(5)AIRKarR408; 2008CriLJ4425;

..... the case of ansar ahmed v. state (govt. of nct of delhi) reported in iv (2005) ccr 1. the delhi high court dealt with the effect of the amendment act 9 of 2001 by which deterrent punishment for various offences was prescribed by rationalising the sentence structure and the sentence was depending upon the significant quantities of drugs, lesser the ..... is concerned, the evidence of p.ws. 14 and 15 will have to be looked into.74. p.w. 14 k.c. pillai, assistant chemical examiner, customs house laboratory, custom house, chennai, has deposed in his evidence that he conducted the test as per the united nations manual used by the national narcotics laboratory and he conducted qualitative colour ..... at the kalasipalyam and fw-5 venugopal rao is the cashier of renuka lodge who speaks about allotting the room nos. 101 and 103 to two of the customers and the said customers vacating the room.11. fw-6 s. babulal jain is yet another panch witness for the mahazar ex. p3 which was conducted by fw-1 in .....

Technova Tapes (India) Private Limited, Represented by Its Director A. ...

Court : Karnataka

..... begin to run in computing the period of five years from the date of incorporation of the amendment, namely, the proviso to section 22 which has come into force with effect from 13.12.2000, in terms of the companies amendment act, 2000 and therefore, the period of five years would expire on or before 12.12.2005 and ..... limitation (see: s.s. gadgil v. lal and co. : air 1965 sc 171).it would be useful to extract the unamended section 22 of the companies act, as well as the amended section 22 , for a better understanding of the rival contentions of the parties.unamended section 22 rectification of name of company - (1) if through inadvertence, or ..... that would arise for consideration by this court is, whether an application under section 22 of the companies act, 1956, as amended by the trade marks act, 1999, in terms of section 158 and the schedule thereto of the trades marks act, 1999, was maintainable, at the instance of the second respondent there in before the first respondent against the .....

L and T Case Equipment Pvt. Limited Represented by Its Area Accountant ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3072; (2010)27VST447(Karn)

..... the said section 4-b was substituted by new section 4-b and 4-bb with effect from 1-4-1995 by the karnataka tax on entry of goods (amendment) act, 2000 (karnataka act no. 3 of 2003).4. the petitioners submit that the present section 4-b and 4-bb also has in no way cured the defect which has been pointed ..... the charging section in respect of levy of entry tax on motor vehicles. the said section was inserted in the act for the first time with effect from 01.04.1995 by the karnataka tax on entry of goods (amendment act), 1994 (karnataka act no. 45 of 1994). number of writ petition were filed before the high court challenging the constitutional validity of ..... section 4-b of the said act on the ground that it is ultra vires articles 301 and 304(a) of the constitution .....

B.K. Suresh Babu S/O Late B.L. Kamalaraj Chetty, Vs. Smt. Ananthalaksh ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(3)KarLJ386; 2009(1)KCCR551; 2009(2)AIRKarR214; AIR2009NOC1286

..... ) cast an obligation to pay an additional amount by way of compensation. such an obligation did not exist prior to the enactment of the provision by the amending act. if the provision is applied to acquisition proceedings which commenced prior to its enactment. the provision would be operating retrospectively in respect of transactions already past. in ..... this regard, as the parliament has clearly indicated in terms of section 30(1) of the amending act indicating the intention of parliament as to the extent to which the provision of section 23(1-a) would apply to pending proceedings, section 23(1-a) ..... minister of labour and national service [1950] 2 all er 525, brindle v. h.w. smith (cabinets) ltd. [1973] all er 230 : [1972] 1 wlr 1653, customs and excise commissioners v. thorn electrical industries ltd. [1975] 3 all er 881, alexander v. mercuris [1979] 3 all er 305, secretary of state for social security v. .....