Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter x cereals Court: orissa Page 1 of about 10 results (0.212 seconds)

Oct 08 2004 (HC)

Orissa Consumers' Association and Anr. Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulato ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2005Ori11

..... by the supreme court in collector of central excise v. new tobacco co. (supra) was applied in m/s. garware nylons ltd. v. the collector of customs and central excise, pune (air 1996 sc 844) (supra) and it was held that the effective date of notification is the date when the notification after printing ..... hasan (air 1972 sc 892); collector of central excise v. new tobacco co. (air 1998 sc 668) and m/s. garware nylons ltd. v. collector of customs and central excise, pune (air 1999 sc 844) (supra) cited by mr. jena do not apply to the facts of the present case.7. mr. samareswar mohanty ..... orissa electricity regulatory commission (terms and conditions for determination of tariff) regulations, 2004 and the orissa electricity regulatory commission (conduct of business) regulations, 2004. thereafter the petitioners amended the writ petition and prayed for quashing the regulations framed by the commission under the 2003 act and for declaring the said regulations invalid and inoperative and as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2010 (HC)

Jayaram SwaIn and ors.Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

..... for a company, it may also be for a public purpose. therefore, if a company, namely a cooperative society registered under the central or state cooperative societies act, preceding 1984 amendment act, had to acquire the land it had to do so in strict compliance with chapter vii. if the company, (cooperative society) requires land for any purpose ..... up capital, as may be prescribed. however, sub-section (6) of section 3 provides that a company registered under section 25 of the act, 1956 before or after the commencement of companies (amendment) act, 2000 shall not be required to have minimum paid-up capital specified in the section. public company is a residuary company. 14. mr. ..... exercise its power. in this context, it is necessary to extract what the apex court said in commissioner of customs v. essar oil ltd., (2004) 11 scc 364, at page 376 : 30. a fraud is an act of deliberate deception with the design of securing something by taking unfair advantage of another. it is a deception in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2010 (HC)

Sudarshan Gochhayat. Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

..... for a company, it may also be for a public purpose. therefore, if a company, namely a cooperative society registered under the central or state cooperative societies act, preceding 1984 amendment act, had to acquire the land it had to do so in strict compliance with chapter vii. if the company, (cooperative society) requires land for any purpose ..... up capital, as may be prescribed. however, sub-section (6) of section 3 provides that a company registered under section 25 of the act, 1956 before or after the commencement of companies (amendment) act, 2000 shall not be required to have minimum paid-up capital specified in the section. public company is a residuary company. 14. mr. ..... exercise its power. in this context, it is necessary to extract what the apex court said in commissioner of customs v. essar oil ltd., (2004) 11 scc 364, at page 376 : 30. a fraud is an act of deliberate deception with the design of securing something by taking unfair advantage of another. it is a deception in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 2002 (HC)

Sanjay Kumar Sharma Vs. Smt. Vidya Sharma and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2003Ori89; 2003(I)OLR385

..... the brief facts leading to this petition are that marriage between the present petitioner and opposite party no. 1 was solemnised on 10-2-1995 as per hindu rites and customs whereafter they lived as husband and wife in the house of the petitioner's father, i.e. opposite party no. 2. on 4-10-2001, a deed of ..... the learned counsel for the petitioner, 1 find that the judgment was rendered in a case arising out of orissa consolidation of holdings and prevention of fragmentation of land act, 1972 and the said decision is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case.13. considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into ..... made in the present revision petition, a petition was filed by the present opposite party no. 1 before the judge, family court, cuttackunder section 13 of the hindu marriage act, basing mainly upon the deed of settlement, and the same was registered as civil proceeding'no. 209 of 2002. it is alleged that after the said proceeding was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1995 (HC)

G.R. Graphite Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2003(163)ELT154(Ori)

..... notification no. 23/55-c.e., dated 29-4-1955, and further they are exempted from licensing control under notification no. 111/78-c.e., dated 9-5-1978 as amended by notification no. 11/88-c.e., dated 15-4-1988. with these conclusions the asst. collector did not impose penalty under rules 173q and 210 of the central excise ..... under the sub-heading 2505.90 and notification no. 23/55, dated 29-4-1955 is not applicable. on being moved by the petitioners, the assistant collector, central excise and customs, sambalpur by his order dated 19-6-1991 held that the graphite flakes and powders produced by the petitioners are excisable goods and classifiable under chapter heading 2505 and are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1996 (HC)

N.K. Chemicals and Industries Vs. Asstt. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2003(155)ELT245(Ori)

..... the petitioners under compelling circumstances could not file their show cause and the authority concerned was in a hurry to rectify/amend its mistake. we do not think it proper to send the petitioners to agitate their grievance before the appellate forum ..... demand notice passed by annexure-6. the said notice reads as follows :-'in pursuance of assistant collector, central excise and customs, sambalpur order dated 1-5-91 wherein classification list was approved and communicated under letter c. no. v (34) 17 ..... depth and without considering the contentions of the petitioners, opposite party no. 1 classified the products of the petitioners under tariff sub-heading 3402.90 with basic excise duty @15% ad valorem and special service duty 5% of the basic. ..... 23,589.40 as differential duty. as there was non-compliance of the provisions enjoined under section 11a of the act and without issuance of notice to show cause, the petitioners preferred another appeal against the aforesaid order of demand passed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 1994 (HC)

Sri Narayan Prasad Vs. the State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1995(II)OLR361

..... payment to be made to the state government under section 29. sub-section (10) defines 'export' means to take out of the state otherwise than across a customs frontier as defined by the central government in. sub-section (12); 'import' means (except in the phrase import into all states of india) to bring into the ..... relating to the excise revenue.9. in exercise of the powers conferred under section 89 of the act, the state government have framed the orissa excise (exclusive privilege) rules, 1970, hereinafter referred to as 'the rule'. these rules were amended by the state government by notification dated 2-3-1989 published in the orissa gazette (extraordinary) ..... state otherwise than across customs frontier as defined by the central government. under sub-section (21) 'transport' means, to remove from one place to another within the state-section 17 of the act provides for payment of duty on removal of distillery, brewery, warehouse or other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2007 (HC)

Badal Barik Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2008(I)OLR133

..... alia, stating that the daughter of the informant got married to the petitioner in the year 2003 as per the hindu rites and customs. at the time of marriage, the informant gave the couple a sum of rs. 20,000/- in cash, gold ornaments and ..... investigation and upon finding that no offence has been alleged in the f.i.r., is of the view that the act of the concerned police officer discloses a total irresponsible manner in discharging his duties, which is contrary to the prescribed procedure ..... reason as to why the police registered the case under the aforementioned sections of the indian penal code and the d.p. act.6. chapter xii of the code of criminal procedure lays down the provisions with regard to information to the police and ..... dated 19.6.2007 for the alleged commission of offence under sections 498a/304b ipc read with section 4 of the d.p. act. on such a case being registered, the petitioner apprehending arrest has approached this court in the present application for grant of anticipatory .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2010 (HC)

M/S. Kukumina Constructions (P) Ltd. Vs. Sub-registrar-cum-stamp Colle ...

Court : Orissa

..... has justified his action in withholding the registration certificate. to appreciate this contention, it is necessary to know what is contemplated in section 47a of indian stamp act, 1899 (orissa amendment) and rule 28 of the orissa stamp rules, 1952. the relevant provisions of section 47 a are reproduced below: "47-a. instruments under-valued how ..... section 47 a the collector shall, when he has finally dealt with it return it to the registering officer concerned."section 47a of the india stamp act, 1989 (orissa amendment) contemplates that if the registering officer while registering any instrument of conveyance has reason to believe that the market value of the property which is ..... of the underpaid duty. the settled legal position is that if there is any conflict between the provisions of the act and the provisions of the rules, the former will prevail. (ispat industries ltd. v. commissioner of customs, mumbai, (2006) 12 scc 583)further, it is the settled law that where there is a direct .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2006 (HC)

Pradeep Kumar Nanda Vs. Sanghamitra Binakar

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2007Ori60; 103(2007)CLT174

..... settle down and start a new chapter in life.while concluding as above, the supreme court also recommended the union of india to seriously consider bringing an amendment in the hindu marriage act, 1955 to incorporate irretrievable break down of marriage as a ground for grant of divorce.11. thus, the ratio of the above decision is that in ..... the ratio of the above decision by application of articles 141 and 142 of the constitution of india, it can be construed that till the legislature amends section 13 of the act as recommended by the supreme court irretrievable break down of marriage can be considered to be a ground for grant of a decree of divorce.13. ..... civil judge, (senior division), bhubaneswar passed in o.s. no. 342 of 2002.2. the appellant-husband and the respondent-wife were admittedly married in accordance with hindu customs and rites on 1.12. 1999. it is also the admitted case that from 6.6.2001 they are separately residing though appellant-husband alleges that the respondent-wife .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //