Skip to content


Current - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: current Court: chennai Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.045 seconds)
Jul 16 2004 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kamala Selvaraj

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-16-2004

Reported in: (2006)203CTR(Mad)242; [2005]273ITR154(Mad)

1 in pursuance of the directions by this court in t c p no 283 of 1997 dated march 9...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 23 2004 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax-ii Vs. Periyar District Co-op. Milk Pro ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-23-2004

Reported in: (2004)190CTR(Mad)272; [2004]266ITR705(Mad)

..... return of loss within the due date prescribed under sections 139 3 application also to current assessment year decision in favour of assessee income tax act 1961 s 139 return revised ..... return of loss within the due date prescribed under sections 139 3 application also to current assessment year decision in favour of assessee income tax act 1961 s 139

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 30 2004 (HC)

Dr. V. Srinivasan Vs. Commissioner of Gift-tax

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-30-2004

Reported in: (2004)192CTR(Mad)371; [2004]270ITR97(Mad); (2004)3MLJ499

..... 2000 108 taxman 426 mad applied application principle enunciated in this case is applicable to current assessment year decision in favour of revenue gift tax act 1958 s 4 1 a ..... 2000 108 taxman 426 mad applied application principle enunciated in this case is applicable to current assessment year decision in favour of revenue gift tax act 1958 s 4 1 a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 2004 (HC)

Shanthi Vs. District Magistrate and District Collector and the Secreta ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-19-2004

Reported in: 2004CriLJ3274

..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise ..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 17 2004 (HC)

Namath Watch Co., by Its Proprietor Kalimullah Vs. G. Vijayakumar and ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-17-2004

Reported in: (2004)3MLJ1

..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise ..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 04 2004 (HC)

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Indian Warehousing Industries Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-04-2004

Reported in: (2004)188CTR(Mad)283; [2004]269ITR203(Mad)

..... anr 1998 2 dtc 628 sc 1998 231 itr 308 sc distinguished application not to current assessment year decision in favour of revenue finance act 1983 s 40 3 finance act ..... anr 1998 2 dtc 628 sc 1998 231 itr 308 sc distinguished application not to current assessment year decision in favour of revenue finance act 1983 s 40 3

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 07 2004 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. A. Radhakrishnan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-07-2004

Reported in: [2004]271ITR109(Mad)

..... distinguished dalmia cement ltd v cit air 1999 sc 2154 relied on application also to current assessment year decision in favour of assessee income tax act 1961 section 60

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 15 2004 (HC)

Seshasayee Paper and Boards Limited Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Inc ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-15-2004

Reported in: (2005)193CTR(Mad)641; [2005]272ITR165(Mad)

..... assessee could exercise option not to claim the unabsorbed depreciation against the income of the current year and postpone such adjustment till unabsorbed investment allowance is absorbed is right in ..... could exercise option not to claim the unabsorbed depreciation against the income of the current year and postpone such adjustment till unabsorbed investment allowance is absorbed is right in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 2004 (HC)

Dr. P. Venkatarama Reddy Vs. R. Aswathnarayana Setty

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2004

Reported in: (2004)2MLJ672

..... muniraja have been paid by the respondent tenant therefore the current consumption charge paid in respect of the shop occupied muniraja ..... and since the other tenant muniraja is not sharing the current consumption charges the revision petitioner tenant sent only rs 166 ..... muniraja or to the respondent landlord with regard to the current consumption charges payable by muniraja in respect of the shop .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 14 2004 (HC)

El Forge Limited Vs. State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil N ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-14-2004

Reported in: [2005]64SCL529(Mad)

..... now transferred in the name of the petitioner subject to payment of current land cost accordingly a sum of rs 13 00 750 was ..... price paid earlier by m s chendur forge exports ltd and the current land cost 3 according to the petitioner there was no transfer of ..... existing unit in the sipcot complex is merged with another company the current land cost will be collected and the new incumbent will be asked .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //