Current - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: current Court: chennai Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.033 seconds)Perrarivalan Vs. the Inspector General of Prisons, Madras and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-1992
Reported in: 1992CriLJ3125
somasundaram j 1 the prayer in this writ petition runs as follows for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV. Balachandran Vs. Union of India and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-13-1992
Reported in: [1993]76CompCas67(Mad)
mishra j 1 the petitioner herein who was enrolled as an advocate in the bar council of tamil nadu in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kerala Lines Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-1992
Reported in: [1993]201ITR106(Mad)
..... 5 in working out the relief under s 80j application not to current assessment years income tax act 1961 s 80j income tax rules 1962 ..... shall not be deducted under s 40 a ii application also to current assessment years income tax act 1961 s 40 a ii business expenditure ..... be an allowable item of expenditure under s 37 application also to current assessment years income tax act 1961 s 37 1 the taxes paid .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKanthimathy Plantations Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu (Represented by A ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-18-1992
Reported in: [1994]207ITR846(Mad)
..... no infirmity in the reasoning of the authorities below or the tribunal application also to current assessment years t n agrl ita 1955 s 5 agricultural income tax agricultural income chargeability ..... 262 mad followed conclusion rubber replantation subsidy is not chargeable revenue receipt application also to current assessment years t n agrl ita 1955 s 5 agricultural income tax deduction under s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ. Bakthavatchalam and anr. Vs. P. Krishnamoorthy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-06-1992
Reported in: (1992)2MLJ407
..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise ..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWren Bennett and Co. India Ltd. Vs. Dr. C.P. Gupta and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-1992
Reported in: (1992)2MLJ410
..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise ..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. V.T. Ramalingam and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-22-1992
Reported in: (1993)115CTR(Mad)225; [1993]201ITR839(Mad)
..... residential purposes as contemplated under the latter part of s 5 1 vi not to current assessment years wealth tax act 1957 s 5 1 iv wealth tax exemption under s ..... is not any the less exclusive so far as the assessee is concerned not to current assessment years wealth tax act 1957 s 5 1 iv 1 in these tax case .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Rajagopal and ors. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-29-1992
Reported in: (1992)2MLJ404
..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise ..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamasamy Gounder (Deceased) and anr. Vs. the Special Tahsildar (Debt R ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-19-1992
Reported in: (1992)2MLJ379
..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise ..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. E.M. Gopalakrishna Kone Trust
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-17-1992
Reported in: [1995]212ITR173(Mad)
..... error in coming to this conclusion and no question of law arose application also to current assessment years a y 1973 74 to 1986 87 dt judg 17 11 1992 wealth .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT