Crossing - Year 2012 - Judgments

Feb 22 2012 (TRI)

Shiv Narayan Vs. Indian Red Cross Society Through the Secretary Genera ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-22-2012

..... in government of india is not applicable to the indian red cross society the question of applicability of the government 8217 s ..... of government residences rules are not applicable in the indian red cross society the allotment rules recommended by the respondents are rational ..... which is managed by the managing body of the indian red cross society they have their own rules therefore applicant would be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 2012 (TRI)

Sunita Kaushik Vs. Indian Red Cross Society National Head Quarters 1 R ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-21-2012

..... in the government of india are not applicable in indian red cross society hereinafter referred to as ircs it is the managing body ..... on seeing the website where the designation and post in indian red cross society are detailed there are two posts of receptionist one in ..... without ldc or udc scales in cadre and post of indian red cross society as such the stand taken by the official respondents to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 20 2012 (HC)

Sanjiv Kumar and anr. Vs. the District Red Cross Society and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-20-2012

..... 11 2012 sanjiv kumar anr petitioner s versus the district red cross society ors respondent s coram hon ble mr justice rakesh ..... the very outset learned counsel appearing on behalf of the red cross society has raised a preliminary objection that in view of ..... to entertain this petition as the employees of the indian red cross society have to approach the central administrative tribunal to support the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 2012 (HC)

Avadh NaraIn Tiwari Vs. the Indian Red Cross Society

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-11-2012

w p no 6811 2008 a n tiwari versus the indian red cross society and others 12 12 2012 shri atulanand awasthy learned counsel for the petitioner shri .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 12 2012 (HC)

U. Kirubanandam Vs. State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Management Br ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-12-2012

prayer petition under article 226 of the constitution of india praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 04 2012 (TRI)

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on: Oct-04-2012

..... and current tariffs in respect of the categories of consumers who are paying cross subsidy represented cross subsidy however in the absence of an authentic and updated cos and the ..... section 181 does not require the state commission to frame regulations for determination of cross subsidy surchargecentral commission has framed regulations under section 178 fixing the trading marginstate commission .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 22 2012 (HC)

State Vs. Mohd. Naushad and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-22-2012

..... about the said pointing out counsel submitted that even during cross examination by the prosecution with leave of court the ..... facts also into consideration concededly these were deposed during the cross examination by the prosecution the apparent conflict in the testimony ..... reveals that no material discrepancies have been elicited in the cross examination of this witness to discard his version given .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 2012 (TRI)

Tata Power Company Limited Bombay House and Others Vs. Maharashtra Ele ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on: Dec-21-2012

..... commission state commission on 29 7 2011 giving in principle approval to charge cross subsidy surcharge from cross over consumers from reliance infrastructure ltd to tata power company 2 the appellants ..... proceedings before the state commission directing the state commission to decide the issue of cross subsidy surcharge in the said tariff proceedings itself after framing the appropriate open access .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 04 2012 (TRI)

M/S Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Haryana Electricity Regula ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on: Oct-04-2012

..... and current tariffs in respect of the categories of consumers who are paying cross subsidy represented cross subsidy however in the absence of an authentic and updated cos and the ..... section 181 does not require the state commission to frame regulations for determination of cross subsidy surchargecentral commission has framed regulations under section 178 fixing the trading marginstate commission .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 10 2012 (HC)

Rajubhai Dhamirbhai Baria and Others Vs. State of Gujarat and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-10-2012

..... inherently defective and untrustworthy he submitted that the trial court had erred in permitting the cross examination of these hostile witnesses upon unwarranted aspect and that the material which was ..... as hostile witness after some time the learned special public prosecutor was permitted to cross examine this witness this witness also therefore does not help the prosecution for establishing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Crossing - Judgment Search Results