Skip to content


Crossing - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: crossing Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.036 seconds)
Aug 12 2010 (HC)

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation. Vs. the Deputy Labour Comm ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Aug-12-2010

order1 petitioner karnataka state road transport corporation aggrieved by the order dated 10 05 2005 annexure a of the 2nd...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2010 (HC)

Sh. O.P. Kaushik Vs. the Management of Indian Red Cross Society and or ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2010

..... the witnesses were examined at his back and he was not given the opportunity to cross examine the witnesses 4 the labour court in the order dated 18th november 1995 has ..... the petitioner at the contemporaneous time was the store keeper of the respondent indian red cross society the respondent in or about november 1979 received a letter from one m s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 27 2010 (FN)

Salazar Vs. Buono

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-27-2010

..... to review the district court granted the 2002 injunction after concluding that a cross on federal land violated the establishment clause the government unsuccessfully challenged that conclusion ..... case is whether congress subsequent decision to transfer ownership of the property underlying the cross cured that violation the establishment clause if nothing else prohibits government from specifying .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 09 2010 (TRI)

Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd. Daganiya, Raipur and An ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on: Feb-09-2010

..... that parallel operation charges earlier paid to the distribution licensee shall be adjusted towards the cross subsidy charges for the past use having recognized and regularized the past use of ..... parallel operation charges and therefore the order ordering for adjustment of parallel operation charges toward cross subsidy charges is wrong this contention in our view is misconceived once it is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 18 2010 (HC)

Sri Aparajit Basak S/O Late Biswanath Basak Vs. State by High Grounds ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-18-2010

Reported in: ILR2010KAR4531

..... 2001 to collect the amount this was elicited in his cross examination the cross examination of this witness further reveals he had taken ..... investigating officer several questions were put 10 him during the cross examination about the details of making phone calls to the ..... and his eagerness or affinity towards deceased acharya the lengthy cross examination of this witness by aeeused 3 has not led .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 2010 (HC)

The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer Vs. Maroti S/O ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-30-2010

..... injuries however the evidence of pw18 regarding relevant respect having remained unshattered during the cross examination the same will be sufficient for establishing the fact of the said shashikala ..... other significant contradiction or omission amounting to contradiction being brought on record during the cross examination for supporting the conclusion of pw3 being either got up witness or witness .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 2010 (HC)

Deepak Ramchandra Chavria Age: 26 Years, and ors. Vs. the State of Mah ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-23-2010

..... in his examination in chief are virtually re affirmed in the cross examination and the testimony of this witness is also free ..... akurdi village all the four appellants started chasing him and after crossing some distance the appellant deepak and sangram assaulted sunil by ..... failed to elucidate any material omission or contradiction in the cross examination of this witness on the other hand all the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 19 2010 (TRI)

M/S. Slotco Steel Products Pvt. Limited and Another Vs. Cce, Delhi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-19-2010

..... respondent the appellants themselves choose to proceed with the adjudication proceedings without insisting for cross examination of witnesses and therefore it is too late for the appellants to contend ..... to them the appellants thereafter did not insist for making those deponents available for cross examination instead the appellants requested for ignoring their statements while deciding the matter in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 2010 (SC)

John Pandian, and ors. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, T. Nadu. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-03-2010

..... a witness who entered the witness box and offered himself for cross examination therefore the fact that the confessional statement was made ..... venkatraman a 1 and sherry it has further come in his cross examination that even before he had prepared the documents showing ..... at the instance of francis chellakili pw 31 he in his cross examination very specifically stated that there was no person named .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 12 2010 (FN)

Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd, R (on the application of) Vs. Wolverhamp ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

Decided on: May-12-2010

..... likely to contribute to wider well being benefits 37 the possibility of one development cross subsidising another highly desirable development was capable of being a material consideration in the ..... in any event the authorities showed that financial considerations including off site benefits through cross subsidies were relevant and were essentially a matter for evaluation by the planning authority .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //