Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013 Section 3 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: criminal law amendment act 2013 section 3 Court: south africa supreme court of appeal Page 1 of about 305 results (4.785 seconds)Matsheng Jacob Chake Vs. the State
Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
..... imprisonment for life by a regional court under section 51 1 of the criminal law amendment act 1997 act 105 of 1997 he or she may note ..... of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 rdquo euro decision in s v alam 2011 2 sacr 553 wcc approved comparative citation 2013 zasca 141 ..... he would kill them if they reported what he had done 3 the appellant pleaded not guilty and denied that these events .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJacob Mashinini and Another Vs. the State
Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
admitted d the provisions of section 112 3 of the criminal procedure act 1977 act no 51 of 1977 shall apply 51 1 2 and 3 provide 1 notwithstanding any other law but subject to subsections 3 and 6 a regional court indeed it is section 52 2 of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 prinsloo j thank you mr phahlane her reasons for convicting the accused c if a judge acts under the proviso to paragraph b he or she shall of guilty in respect of both accused in terms of section 52 2 b of act 105 of 1997 yes 40 high court deems likely to promote the ends of justice 33 part i of schedule 2 to the extent here relevant
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHumbulani Makatu Vs. the State
Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
..... sentences euro ldquo 3 counts euro ldquo murder euro ldquo rape read with section 51 1 of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 ..... some 8 years the appeal in this court was heard on 3 september 2013 5 as the appellant pleaded guilty to two of the ..... unreported judgment of this court in nemavhola v state 45 13 2013 zasca 81 the appellants counsel submitted that absent these details the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWilliam Munyai Vs. the State
Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
..... high court hetisani j on one count of rape read with provisions of section 51 2 of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 and on the alternative count of contravening s 14 ..... 2010 2 sacr 178 sca para 11 3 s v matyityi 2011 1 sacr 40 sca para 17 4 s v smm 2013 2 sacr 292 sca para 17 5 ..... s v chapman 1997 zasca 45 1997 2 sacr 3 sca at 5a b 6 for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTiaIn Cameron Mclaggan Vs. the State
Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
..... criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 the sub section ..... terms of criminal law amendment act 105 ..... subsection 52 3 attacked ..... is upheld 3 the ..... undisputed 3 at ..... of 3 to ..... the criminal procedure act 51 ..... of act 51 ..... ldquo a section 51 ..... crime the criminal and ..... of act 105 ..... is upheld 3 the ..... law suit at about 3 ..... 3 read with s 1 56 1 57 1 58 59 and 60 of the criminal law sexual offences and related matters amendment act .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlex Dikeledi Mahlase Vs. the State
Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
who later testified in terms of s 204 of the criminal procedure act 51 of 1977 she was raped by three purview of s 51 2 a ii of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 a minimum sentence of 20 of s 51 2 a ii of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 a minimum sentence of 20 years appropriate there is nothing in ss 301 to 303 of act 56 of 1955 which ousts such a view on the not consider that the word oelig evidence in the above section was intended to have its strict meaning as would be r v zonele and others 1959 3 sa 319a at 330 a previous conviction may be described as one which occurred
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State Vs. Phakamani a Nkunkuma and Others
Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
19 summary appeal in terms of s 316 b of criminal procedure act 51 of 1977 against sentences prescribed minimum sentences of the act read as follows 1 notwithstanding any other law but subject to subsections 3 and 6 a regional court provisions of the criminal law sexual offences and related matters amendment act 32 of 2007 count 3 the second respondent was the provisions of s 51 of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 the act which prescribes minimum sentences for truly convincing reasons exist for departing from them comparative citation 2013 zasca 122 count 3 the second respondent was not indicted on count 3 before pleading to the charges they were alerted to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPn Vs. the State
Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
charge sheet to the prescribed minimum sentence in terms of criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 euro ldquo provisions in terms of s 52 1 b 1of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 the act 2 in the terms of s 52 1 b 1of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 the act 2 in the high the prescribed minimum sentence in terms of criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 euro ldquo provisions not brought to the criminal law sentencing amendment act 38 of 2007 2 section 51 1 provides notwithstanding any other law but subject to on count one the accused is sentenced to an effective 30 years imprisonment 2 the sentence is antedated to 29 june
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSamson Mawela Mudau Vs. the State
Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
provisions contained in s 51 3 aa ii of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 as far as the sca para 8 2 section 51 1 of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 read with s 51 3 in s 51 3 aa ii of the criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 as far as the absence of 19although release is nonetheless provided for in the correctional services act 111 of 1998 whether it is an appropriate sentence particularly 3 sa 341 sca at 344j 345a is apposite 11 section 12 1 c and e of the constitution 12 s assist her to complete forms for admission to the school 3 the child testified that the appellant was alone when she
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPiet Kwanape Vs. the State
Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
minimum sentence rdquo euro imposition of in terms of criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 read with part 1 attracted by an even greater horror means only that the law can offer nothing more whether and if so to what rdquo euro imposition of in terms of criminal law amendment act 105 of 1997 read with part 1 of schedule national consciousness about what is always and foremost an aggressive act it is a violation that is invasive and dehumanising the sentence in terms of s 52 of the act 2 section 521as it then stood required a regional court when it of south africa act 108 of 1996 3 at 334d 335g 4 s v malgas 2001 1 sacr 469 sca sa
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT