Skip to content


Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013 Section 3 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: criminal law amendment act 2013 section 3 Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 603 results (4.051 seconds)
Oct 04 1961 (HC)

Vidya Sagar Bulaqi Ram Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1962P& H487

who is being prosecuted under section 6 1 of the criminal law amendment act 1960 has instigated or incited disobedience of even though a vested one can be taken away by law it is pertinent to note that section 100 a introduced an offence under section 6 1 of the criminal law amendment act he has taken me through the record of the an appeal arising out of a proceeding under a special act sections 100 a as inserted by act 22 of 2002 passed by a single judge in an appeal filed under section 104 c p c a further appeal lies to a 2 of section 6 of the criminal law amendment act 30 of 1960 which lays down 6 2 notwithstanding anything contained

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 1954 (HC)

Krishen Kumar Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1955P& H151; 1955CriLJ1101

the act provided notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure 1898 a police officer below the rank of a the special enactments or other instruments having the force of law be it against original appellate decree or order heard and the special judge on the commencement of the criminal law amendment act 1952 state v mohindar singh the special judge took code or sub section 2 of section 5 of the act unless the conditions of section 5a of the act wore are 1 whether investigation of an offence under section 161 section 165 or section 165a of the indian penal code or in the authorities which have construed the proviso to section 3 of the act there is conflict in the high courts

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 02 1959 (HC)

Madhu Limaye Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1959P& H506; 1959CriLJ1209

or fourth by means of criminal force or show of criminal force to any person to take or obtain possession of penal code 6 it is well recognised that at common law a man is not to be deprived of his liberty informing the petitioner of the sections of the criminal law amendment act 1932 and of the indian penal code for which therefore arises whether enumeration of sections of criminal law amendment act or of indian penal code was proper compliance of the that the person wasbeing arrested under section 143 read with section 117 indian penal code did not provide him with information arrested from the office of the socialist party at about 3 30 p m and was taken to the police station

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 13 1948 (PC)

In Re: Hardial Singh S/O Rallia Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1949CriLJ370

been declared to be an unlawful association under section 16 criminal law amendment act of 1908 the only action which could period of six months for which the three detenus can lawfully be detained is due to expire on 19th august 1918 was to try and prosecute them under the criminal law amendment act and that their detention under the safety act was in the manner indicated in section 17 of the aforesaid act was his prosecution under the said section and that the to a division bench cannot be accepted the newly incorporated section 100a in clear and specific terms prohibits further appeal against be cancelled 20 chajju ram the detenu in or m 330 of 1948 was arrested under the orders of mr shanti

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 03 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr.Harvinder Pal Singh Ghuman Advocate Vs. Union Territory, C ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... exercise the discretionary power under the proviso of section 376 2 of ipc it is imperative to mention that the legislature through the criminal law amendment act 2013 has deleted this proviso in the wake of ..... accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh crm not m 5575 of 2013 o m 3 offence against society and not merely against a private individual 7 sequelly the same .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 24 2013 (HC)

Mohan Lal Vs. Senior Superintendent of Police Pathankot and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... of respondents no 3 and 4 11 there is now a drastic change in the penal provisions introduced by the criminal law amendment act 2013 before the amendment the definition of term rape given under section 375 ipc ..... she is under 16 years of age after the amendment came into force w e f 3 2 2013 various acts have been termed rape under section 375 ipc including sexual intercourse with a girl .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 1948 (PC)

Ramji Lal S/O Mahadeo Parshad Vs. Rex

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1949CriLJ271

in absence of any prohibition contained in the law of criminal procedure or in the rules does not appeal to me therefore is that in absence of any provisions of statute law and in the absence of any rule on the subject pertinent to note that section 100 a introduced by 2002 amendment of the code starts with a non obstante clause the of section 491 read with section 108 government of india act 1915 and clause 20 letters patent it was nut and section 203 were not a judgment within the meaning of section 369 the general principle was applicable and the order was which is followed by the sentence is the judgment section 367 suggests what contents of a judgment should be and what

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 16 1999 (HC)

Jagir Singh Vs. the State of Haryana and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1999CriLJ4505

in the code of criminal procedure by the parliament through criminal law amendment act 1978 it came in force on 18 the code of criminal procedure by the parliament through criminal law amendment act 1978 it came in force on 18 12 code of criminal procedure by the parliament through criminal law amendment act 1978 it came in force on 18 12 78 he had undergone 9 years 0 months and 12 days actual sentence including under trial period besides he had enjoyed parole been commuted to life imprisonment for less than 14 years section 433 a cr p c is attracted to the case prayer he has averred that he was arrested on 6 3 78 and was awarded sentence of imprisonment for life on

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 26 1996 (HC)

Jagdish Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : I(1997)DMC230

m l singhal j 1 this is criminal miscellaneous no 6602 m of 1996 filed by jagdish son mother in law brought kerosene her husband and father in law caught hold of her and her mother in law sprinkled was introduced in the criminal procedure code by criminal law amendment act 1978 with effect from 18 12 1978 section 433 cases may be considered after completion of 10 years of actual sentence including under trial period provided that the total period of actual imprisonment in jail this is the intent of section 433 a of the cr p c the objects and convict prisoners prematurely and directed vide letter 7483 2 jj 30099 dated 18 11 1987 to put up the cases of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 26 1948 (PC)

Ramji Lal S/O Mahadeo Parsad Vs. Rex

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1949P& H67

sustain it there is nothing like res judicata in a criminal trial as long as it does not terminate in either both judges agree that the determination involves a question of law they may order that the matter or the question of code was amended in 1882 but it provided that the amendment would not restore any jurisdiction or form of procedure not it was intended that under section 491 a judge could act on his own initiative then language analogous to section 526 frame rules to regulate the procedure in oases under this section 3 nothing in this section applies to persons detained under various chapters 19 reference may however be made to chapter 3 a of this volume the first rule says that the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //