Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.5988/2006 Manohar Singh vs. Union of India & ors. Judgment dt;30/4/2014 1/42 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT Manohar Singh vs. Union of India & Others. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.5988/2006 DATE OF JUDGMENT :30. h April, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Anil Bhandari, for the petitioner. Mr.Jagdish Vyas, for the National Insurance Company. BY THE COURT:1. Whether it was resignation. from service or retirement. voluntarily taken by the petitioner from his employer, National Insurance Company, is the question involved in the present case.2. The petitioner Manohar Singh, was appointed as a Development Inspector on 09 August 1979 and since then he continuously served the respondent Insurance Company till 2006 for 27 years. On 18 January 2006, due to some unavoidable family SBCWP No.5988/2006 Manohar Singh vs. Union of India & ors. Judgment dt;30/4/2014 2/42 circumstances, the petitioner informed the Deputy General Manager of th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 D.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.2322/2011 Smt. Abha Trivedi vs. Shri Rajendra Kumar Gautam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: D.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.2322/2011 Smt. Abha Trivedi vs. Shri Rajendra Kumar Gautam Date of Judgment ::24. h September, 2013 PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. R.K. Purohit, for the appellant. Ms. Abha Trivedi appellant wife present-in-person. Mr. Rajendra Singh Charan, for the respondent. Mr. Rajendra Kumar respondent husband present-in-person. ---- BY THE COURT: (PER HON'BLE BHANSALI, J.) This appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act has been filed by the appellant-applicant-wife aggrieved against judgment and decree dated 11.08.2011 passed by the Judge, Family Court No.1, Jodhpur ('the Family Court'), whereby, the application filed by her under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 ('the Act') has been dismissed. The brief facts of the case can be summarized thus:- T...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4292/2013 Prem Chand Dhanoria V/s. Union of India & ORS.Date of Order ::: 13.10.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.Abhishek Pareek, for the petitioner. Mr.Vipul Dharnia for Mr.Ravi Bhansali for respondent No.1. Mr.Dinesh Mehta for respondent Nos.2 & 3, Mr.M.R.Singhvi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Mohit Singhvi for respondent No.6. Petitioner, an unsuccessful applicant for allotment of retail outlet dealership of respondent Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (for, 'short HPCL') having location at six kilometers from Motipura Chowki Railway Crossing towards Chabbra, Udaipur, has laid this writ petition praying therein under mentioned reliefs :- It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be allowed :- A/ By an appropriate writ order or direction, the Result dated 20.01.2011 (Annexure-4) pertaining to private respondent Chetan Maheshwari and pri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6496/2015 Banwari Lal versus State of Raj. & ORS.Date of Order :: 10th September, 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Pritam Solanki ) Mr.V.K.Aggarwal ) Dr. Dhankanwar Rajpurohit ).for the petitioner. Dr. Sachin Acharya, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against order dated 19.06.2015 (Annexure-14) passed by District Excise Officer, Hanumangarh ('DEO').whereby, the approval dated 22.02.2014 and licence dated 23.03.2014 for the year 2015-16 granted in favour of the petitioner has been cancelled at the risk and cost of the petitioner, the entire security amount and advance exclusive privilege amount after adjusting the same towards deficit for the month of June, 2015 has been forfeited and it has further been ordered that in case of deficit on account of re-auction of t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.54/2009 LRs of Abdul Majid versus Pukhraj and ORS.Date of Judgment :: 20.01.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Sukesh Bhati, for the appellants. Mr.R.R.Nagori, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Alkesh Agarwal, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against judgment and decree dated 23.08.1995 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division).Jodhpur City, Jodhpur ('the trial court') as upheld by the appellate decree dated 16.10.2008 passed by Additional District Judge (Fast Track) No.4, Jodhpur ('the appellate court').The facts in brief may be noticed thus: the suit was filed in the year 1974 by Shankar Lal, father the respondents-plaintiffs seeking permanent injunction against Abdul Majid, father of the appellants, inter alia, with the averments that the land in question was sold by the Urban Improvement Trust, Jodhpur to 2 the plaitniff on 10.04...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.194/2009 Bhagwan Giri V/s State of Rajasthan and ors. and 19 connected writ petitions. Order dt:25. 04/2014 1/42 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.194/2009 Bhagwan Giri S/O Sh. Nathu Giri V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4983/2009 Chatra S/O Sh. Sardaria V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.3. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4984/2009 Smt. Vimlesh Gupta W/o Sh. Brijlal Gupta V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.4. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4995/2009 Mohd. Hanif S/o Sh. Sher Mohd. V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.5. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4996/2009 Abdul Majid Khan S/o Sh. Meer Mohd. Khan V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.6. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5270/2009 Smt. Bijji W/O Moti Ram V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.7. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5271/2009 Akhlakh Hussain S/O Sh. Ahmed Khan V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.8. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5272/2009 Babu Lal Sharma S/O Sh. Su...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER M/S.Manglam Warehousing PVT.LTD.versus Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board & ORS.S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7099/2014 Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Date of Order: October 13, 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.Sunil Joshi, for the petitioner. ***** BY THE COURT: Petitioner Company has laid this writ petition imploring annulment of show cause notice dated 20th of May 2014 (Annex.12) and subsequent order dated 20th of August 2014 (Annex.14).whereby Consent to Operate. granted to it under the Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 (for short, Act of 1981) was revoked by the third respondent. [2].Undisputed facts are that Petitioner Company is involved in the business of tyre pyrolysis having its unit situated at Mandore Industrial Area, Nagaur Road, Jodhpur. The Company is manned by thoroughly experienced employees for providing recycled products of quality through t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT ITI Limited through its Sultana Ram Chairman & Managing Vs. Director, Bangalore (1) D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO.57/2013 ITI Limited through its Ashok Kumar Sharma Chairman & Managing Vs. Director, Bangalore (2) D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO.58/2013 UNDER RULE134OF THE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT RULES. Date of Judgment: January 06, 2015 P R E S E N T HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.SUNIL AMBWANI HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA Mr.Muktesh Maheshwari, for the appellants. Mr.D.S.Rajvi, for the respondents. BY THE COURT :(PER HON' BLE THE ACT G. CHIEF JUST ICE) 1. We have heard Mr.Muktesh Maheshwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and Mr.D.S.Rajvi, learned counsel for the respondents.2. Both the Special Appeals raise similar questions of law and are, thus, decided by a common judgment.3. The Indian Telephone Industries (for short, the 2 ITI.) invited names from the Employment Exchange for engagement on th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT ITI Limited through its Sultana Ram Chairman & Managing Vs. Director, Bangalore (1) D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO.57/2013 ITI Limited through its Ashok Kumar Sharma Chairman & Managing Vs. Director, Bangalore (2) D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO.58/2013 UNDER RULE134OF THE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT RULES. Date of Judgment: January 06, 2015 P R E S E N T HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.SUNIL AMBWANI HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA Mr.Muktesh Maheshwari, for the appellants. Mr.D.S.Rajvi, for the respondents. BY THE COURT :(PER HON' BLE THE ACT G. CHIEF JUST ICE) 1. We have heard Mr.Muktesh Maheshwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and Mr.D.S.Rajvi, learned counsel for the respondents.2. Both the Special Appeals raise similar questions of law and are, thus, decided by a common judgment.3. The Indian Telephone Industries (for short, the 2 ITI.) invited names from the Employment Exchange for engagement on th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.109/2000 Smt. Archana Sabharwal vs. Bal Mukund & anr. S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.11/2000 Rakesh Sabharwal vs. Bal Mukund & ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT:21. t August1. 18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (1) S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.109/2000 (SMT. ARCHANA SABHARWAL VS. BAL MUKUND & ANR.) (2) S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.11/2000 (RAKESH SABHARWAL VS. BAL MUKUND & ORS.) DATE OF JUDGMENT :21. 08.2012 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.R.K. Thanvi, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Narendra Thanvi for defendant appellant Shri Rakesh Sabharwal. Mr.Prabhat Ojha, for defendant appellant Smt. Archana Sabharwal. Mr. Suresh Shrimali, for plaintiff respondent Mr. Bal Mukund. REPORTABLE :1. The present two first appeals have been filed by the defendants appellants against a compromise decree dated 25.08.1999 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Abu Road, district Sirohi in Civil Suit No.52/96 (34/95) Bal Mukund s/o Shri Chiranji L...
Tag this Judgment!