Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4292/2013 Prem Chand Dhanoria V/s. Union of India & ORS.Date of Order ::: 13.10.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.Abhishek Pareek, for the petitioner. Mr.Vipul Dharnia for Mr.Ravi Bhansali for respondent No.1. Mr.Dinesh Mehta for respondent Nos.2 & 3, Mr.M.R.Singhvi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Mohit Singhvi for respondent No.6. Petitioner, an unsuccessful applicant for allotment of retail outlet dealership of respondent Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (for, 'short HPCL') having location at six kilometers from Motipura Chowki Railway Crossing towards Chabbra, Udaipur, has laid this writ petition praying therein under mentioned reliefs :- It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be allowed :- A/ By an appropriate writ order or direction, the Result dated 20.01.2011 (Annexure-4) pertaining to private respondent Chetan Maheshwari and pri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2844/2011. Alongwith Contempt Petition No.581/2013 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2844/2011. DIGVIJAY SINGH versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.D.B.CIVIL WRIT CONTEMPT PETITION NO.581/2013 DIGVIJAY SINGH versus SHRI BHANU PRAKASH YETURU & ORS.Date of Order :: 16th December 2013 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE V.K.MATHUR Mr.M.C.Bhoot, Senior Advocate with Mr.Arpit Bhoot ]., for the petitioner. Mr.Digvijay Singh petitioner present in person Mr.Anand Purohit, Senior Advocate & AAG with Mr.Pradhyumn Singh, Assistant to the AAG. Mr.M.S.Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Manish Shishodia ].Mr.Varun Singhvi ].Mr.Hemant Dutt ].Mr.Vinay Kothari ].Mr.Amit Tatia ].Mr.Falgun Buch for Mr.V.K.Mathur ].Dr. Chetan Rajpurohit for Mr.Vikas Balia ]., for the respondents. BY THE COURT: (Per Dinesh Maheshwari,J.) This writ petition (CWP No.2844/2011).filed on 29.03.2011, has been entertained ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2844/2011. Alongwith Contempt Petition No.581/2013 // 1 // IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: D.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.2844/2011. DIGVIJAY SINGH versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.D.B.CIVIL WRIT CONTEMPT PETITION NO.581/2013 DIGVIJAY SINGH versus SHRI BHANU PRAKASH YETURU & ORS.Date of Order :: 16th December 2013 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE V.K.MATHUR Mr.M.C.Bhoot, Senior Advocate with Mr.Arpit Bhoot ]., for the petitioner. Mr.Digvijay Singh petitioner present in person Mr.Anand Purohit, Senior Advocate & AAG with Mr.Pradhyumn Singh, Assistant to the AAG. Mr.M.S.Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Manish Shishodia ].Mr.Varun Singhvi ].Mr.Hemant Dutt ].Mr.Vinay Kothari ].Mr.Amit Tatia ].Mr.Falgun Buch for Mr.V.K.Mathur ].Dr. Chetan Rajpurohit for Mr.Vikas Balia ]., for the respondents. BY THE COURT: (Per Dinesh Maheshwari,J.) This writ petition (CWP No.2844/2011).filed on 29.03.2011, has been entertained ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER (1) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5373/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (2) D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5375/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (3) D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5377/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (4) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8647/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (5) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8648/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (6) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8851/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors. (7) D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8852/2015 Hindustan Zinc Limited v. State of Raj. & ors Date of Order :15. 12.2015. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR. Mr. Dinesh Mehta, for the petitioner. Dr. P.S. Bhati, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Sajjan Singh and Mr. Sanjay Raj Paliwal . REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:(Per Hon'ble Ms. Jaishree Thakur, J.) 1. The above me...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9161/2013 Praveen Kumbhat & Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. ::: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2108/2014 Praveen Kumbhat & Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::7. h December 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.K.C.Samdariya for the petitioners Mr.Bharat Dutt Sharma, Dy.Govt.Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 3 Mr.L.K.Purohit for respondent No.2. BY THE COURT: In both these writ petitions, common questions of law and facts are involved, therefore, both are heard together and disposed of by this common order. Petitioners have filed Writ Petition No.9161/2013 for seeking directions against the respondents to make allotment of shops to the Members of Jodhpur Goods Transport Association, Jodhpur (for short 'the Association') who have applied for allotment of shops pursuant to notification/ advertisement dated 13.12.2006 issued by the second respondent. The facts necessary and german...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9161/2013 Praveen Kumbhat & Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. ::: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2108/2014 Praveen Kumbhat & Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::7. h December 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.K.C.Samdariya for the petitioners Mr.Bharat Dutt Sharma, Dy.Govt.Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 3 Mr.L.K.Purohit for respondent No.2. BY THE COURT: In both these writ petitions, common questions of law and facts are involved, therefore, both are heard together and disposed of by this common order. Petitioners have filed Writ Petition No.9161/2013 for seeking directions against the respondents to make allotment of shops to the Members of Jodhpur Goods Transport Association, Jodhpur (for short 'the Association') who have applied for allotment of shops pursuant to notification/ advertisement dated 13.12.2006 issued by the second respondent. The facts necessary and german...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1195/2015 Smt.Mukut Raj Laxmi & Anr. Vs Dr.Jitendra Singh & ORS.Date of Order :: 26th November 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.S.C.Maloo for the petitioners Mr.O.P.Mehta for the respondent Nos.1 & 2 Mr.G.R.Singhvi for the respondent No.3 BY THE COURT: Imploring annulment of impugned order dated 15.01.2015 (Annex.5) passed by learned District Judge, Jaisalmer (for short the learned court below).the petitioners-defendants have laid this writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of Constitution of India. By the order impugned, the learned court below has accepted the application of the respondents-plaintiffs under Order VIII Rule 9 read with Section 151 CPC in a suit for possession, mesne profits and perpetual injunction. Succinctly stated facts of the case are that fiRs.and second respondents-plaintiffs jointly filed a suit for possession, mesne profits and perpetual injunction against ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.314/2009 Smt.Shyama Vs Prithvi Singh & Ors. Date of Judgment ::9. h October 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.Mahesh Thanvi for the appellant Mr.S.M.Parihar with Mr.Vinay Shrivastava for respondent No.1 Dr.Sachin Acharya for respondent Nos.4 & 5. Reportable BY THE COURT: Unsuccessful in her pursuit for cancellation of adoption deed in favour of the first respondent and partition of property, a biological daughter of late Shivram Tak, the appellant-plaintiff has preferred this first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short CPC). The facts apposite for the purpose of this appeal are that appellant-plaintiff laid a civil suit for partition of the immoveable property, injunction and for declaration of adoption deed dated 16.06.1992 as nullity. By the said adoption deed, late Shivram Tak and his wife Shanti Devi adopted first respondent as their son. At t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the order dated 7.9.2015 passed by the Director and Joint Secretary, Directorate, Local Self Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur, whereby the petitioner has been placed under suspension. The petitioner, who was initially appointed as Assistant Revenue Inspector on 22.12.1983 was last promoted in 1994 on the post of Revenue Inspector and at the time when the order impugned placing the petitioner under suspension was passed, he was discharging his duties on the post of Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Itawa. It is inter-alia indicated in the writ petition that in the year 2009, the services of the petitioner were transferred from the Municipal Board, Kethun to Municipal Board, Rawatbhata where he was posted as Executive Officer. The Anti Corruption Bureau ('ACB') lodged an FIR on 18.7.2012 against the petitioner and Chairman, Municipal Board for the offence under Sections 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Ac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6496/2015 Banwari Lal versus State of Raj. & ORS.Date of Order :: 10th September, 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Pritam Solanki ) Mr.V.K.Aggarwal ) Dr. Dhankanwar Rajpurohit ).for the petitioner. Dr. Sachin Acharya, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against order dated 19.06.2015 (Annexure-14) passed by District Excise Officer, Hanumangarh ('DEO').whereby, the approval dated 22.02.2014 and licence dated 23.03.2014 for the year 2015-16 granted in favour of the petitioner has been cancelled at the risk and cost of the petitioner, the entire security amount and advance exclusive privilege amount after adjusting the same towards deficit for the month of June, 2015 has been forfeited and it has further been ordered that in case of deficit on account of re-auction of t...
Tag this Judgment!