Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & Ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors. Along with 13 other connected matters Judgment dt:3/3/2014 1/71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Panne Singh & Ors. Vs. RSRTC & Ors S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6757/2013 along with 13 other connected matters (See Schedule) DATE OF JUDGMENT :3. d March, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Dr. Nupur Bhati, ]. Mr.Mukesh Rajpurohit, ]. Mr.Lokesh Mathur, ]. Mr. S.K.Verma, ]. Mr. Vipin Mankad, ]. for the petitioners. Mr. M.S.Rathore ]. Mr. Inderjeet Yadav, ]. Mr. P.R.Singh, Addl. Advocate General for RSRTC. REPORTABLE BY THE COURT:1. This bunch of cases has come up before this Court on account of termination of services of the petitioners, who were appointed as Conductors in the respondent RSRTC, a Corporation incorporated under the provisions of The Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950. The facts illustratively are taken from SBCWP No.6757/2013 Panne Singh & ors. vs. RSRTC & Ors.2. In the se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SAW No.904/2013 Union of India & Anr. versus Nahari Thakkar & Anr. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: Union of India & Anr. versus Nahari Thakkar & Anr. D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.904/2013 Date of Order : 28th October 2013 Present HONBLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.V.K.Mathur for the appellants Reportable BY THE COURT: (Per Dinesh Maheshwari,J.) By way of this intra-court appeal, the Union of India and the Chief Post Master General, Rajasthan seek to question the order dated 18.07.2013 passed in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4573/2010 whereby, a learned Single Judge of this Court has rejected their challenge to the order dated 04.02.2010, as passed by the Deputy Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities in Case No.1/1024/08-09, which was registered on a complaint made by the present respondent No.1, a person with 100% visual impairment, stating violation of Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunitie...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
The instant writ petition is directed against the judgment cum award dated 21.9.1994 passed by the Labour Court, Bikaner in Case No. 40/1990 whereby the reference made by the State Government under Section 10(1)(G) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was disposed of directing that the dismissal of the respondent workman Mahendra Yadav from service of petitioner school shall be effective from 21.9.1994. Succinctly stated the facts are that the respondent no. 2 workman was engaged as watchman in the petitioner school in the year 1977. It appears that there were complaints regarding the performance of the duties and conduct of the employee on which he was dismissed from service w.e.f. 20.3.1986 after holding a domestic enquiry wherein it was found that the workman was guilty of misconduct. The respondent workman raised an industrial dispute. The State Government referred the dispute to the Labour Court, Bikaner under Section 10(1)(G) of the I.D.Act. The Labour Court by its order dated 28...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Sunil Ambwani, C.J. 1. The petitioners are residents of Mundron Ka Bas, Gram Panchayat Napasar District Bikaner. By this petition, they have prayed for a direction to declare the Notification dated 18.9.2009 issued by the State Government as illegal and to quash the same with consequential directions, by which the Notification dated 6.10.2008 issued by the State Government under the authority of the Governor of Rajasthan declaring the Gram Panchayat Napasar as Municipality (Nagar Palika) Class IV, was withdrawn in exercise of the powers under section 3(1)(a) of the Rajasthan Municipalities Ordinance, 2008, which was later-on enacted as the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009. The petitioners have also prayed for direction to hold elections for Municipal Board, Napasar and not to hold elections for Gram Panchayat, Napasar. 2. The interim relief application for staying the elections was rejected on 17.1.2005 on the ground that the elections were notified on 24.12.2014. 3. The Napasar is s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Sunil Ambwani, ACJ. 1. We have heard Ms. Indira Jai Singh, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Aditya Shrivastava, Ms. Bindu N. Doddahat and Mr. Satish Kumar for the petitioners in DBCWP No.375/2015-Dulari Devi and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and DBCWP No.376/2015- Norati and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.; Mr. Rajendra Soni in DBCWP No.1/2015, Mr. Pradeep Kalwania in DBCWP No.209/2015; Shri S.S. Hora in DBCWP Nos.503/2015 and 504/2015; Mr. Vijay Choudhary in DBCWP No.251/2015, Mr. Hanuman Choudhary in DBCWP No.250/2015, Mr. Manoj Bhardwaj in DBCWP Nos.121/2015 and 122/2015, and Mr. Bharat Yadav for the petitioners. Mr. Narpal Mal Lodha, learned Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Vishal Soni, Mr. Sheetanshu Sharma, Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Anurag Sharma, Additional Advocate General and Mr. R.B. Mathur, appear for the State of Rajasthan and other respondents. 2. By these writ petitions, the petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ, order or d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the order dated 7.9.2015 passed by the Director and Joint Secretary, Directorate, Local Self Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur, whereby the petitioner has been placed under suspension. The petitioner, who was initially appointed as Assistant Revenue Inspector on 22.12.1983 was last promoted in 1994 on the post of Revenue Inspector and at the time when the order impugned placing the petitioner under suspension was passed, he was discharging his duties on the post of Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Itawa. It is inter-alia indicated in the writ petition that in the year 2009, the services of the petitioner were transferred from the Municipal Board, Kethun to Municipal Board, Rawatbhata where he was posted as Executive Officer. The Anti Corruption Bureau ('ACB') lodged an FIR on 18.7.2012 against the petitioner and Chairman, Municipal Board for the offence under Sections 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Ac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1. We have heard Mr.Muktesh Maheshwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and Mr.D.S.Rajvi, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Both the Special Appeals raise similar questions of law and are, thus, decided by a common judgment. 3. The Indian Telephone Industries (for short, the ITI ) invited names from the Employment Exchange for engagement on the post of Technician and LDC (Accounts Clerk) in the year 1987. Ashok Kumar Sharma, respondent in Writ Petition No.3283/2001 was qualified and was called for interview on 12.11.1987. He was appointed on 28.11.1987. His services were extended from 31.12.1990 and, thereafter, he continued on the post upto 31.3.1992, when his services were dispensed-with on the ground that the work on the project was complete. He filed a Writ Petition No.2225/1992 Ashok Kumar vs. Union of India , which was dismissed on 12.3.1996 on the ground of alternative remedy. He made an application to the State Government on which a reference was mad...
Tag this Judgment!