Corruption - Judgment Search Results

Abdul Majeed Khan S/O Ab. Aziz Khan Vs. State of Jandk Through Pr. Sec ...

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2003(1)JKJ532

..... ultimately culminated into production of challan against the petitioner before the learned special judge anti corruption srinagar on 30 07 1985 that the case is pending adjudication before the said court ..... act the investigation is therefore in contravention of statutory provisions of j k prevention of corruption act 2006 that the speedy and fair trial in a criminal case is essential imperative .....

J. Jayalalitha Vs. State Represented by Superintendent of Police, Spec ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2002CriLJ3026

..... in contravention of the provisions of the foreign exchange regulation act fera and prevention of corruption act 1988 and held pecuniary resources and properties outside the country on behalf of ..... themselves discharged from charges quashing of process of summoning accused to answer charges relating to corruption in public offices render trial pre emptive it is not permissible to quash impugned .....

S.P. Shenbagamoorthy Vs. Mr. Mu. KA. StalIn and the Director, Director ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2003CriLJ271

..... the materials collected by the investigating agency to hold that the allegation of corruption made by the petitioner is not true strangely the principal sessions judge has ..... revision is dismissed criminal investigation section 156 3 of criminal procedure code 1973 and prevention of corruption act petitioner filed compliant against eminent personality of state police conducted preliminary enquiry .....

Needhimanickam Vs. State by Dsp, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Madras

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2003]47SCL772(Mad)

..... gomathiammal then he went to the directorate of vigilance and anti corruption and presented ex p 3 complaint to p w 17 deputy ..... sum of rs 31 000 from the said thiru surynanarayanmoorthy by corrupt or illegal means according to the learned senior counsel the amount ..... sanctioning authority reference to 19 1 c of the prevention of corruption act cannot be held to be violative of the legal principles .....

Shri P.V. Narasimha Rao Vs. State Through Cbi

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2002CriLJ2401; 97(2002)DLT452; 2002(63)DRJ331

..... parliaments are public servants within the ambit of prevention of corruption act and whether privilege under article 105 of the constitution ..... dealt with under section 5 2 of the prevention of corruption act which application was supported by the prosecution consequently the ..... of the 21st century because of mounting political and other corruptions he relied upon the judgments of the supreme court to .....

Bpl Limited Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... this court laid down the following principles before considering as to whether the charges of corrupt practice were established it is important to remember the standard of proof required in such ..... totality of the effect of the entire evidence which leaves a lasting impression regarding the corrupt practices alleged this therefore concludes the question regarding the standard of proof 36 shri chinoy .....

Amarendra Kumar amar @ Dr. Amar Vs. Sharad Yadav

Court: Patna

Reported in: 2002(1)BLJR690

..... in the application under consideration is that although election petition contains the allegation of corrupt practices but then it does not contain adequate statement of material facts and full ..... accompanied by an affidavit duly sworn by the applicant duly verifying diverse allegations of corrupt practices imputed to the returned candidate and attested by the prescribed authority it would .....

Rajendra Pratap Bhanj Deo Vs. Regu Mahesh @ Regu Maheswar Rao and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(2)ALD304

..... petitioner relies b shall set forth full particulars of any corrupt practice that the petitioner alleges including as full a statement ..... verification of pleadings provided that where the petitioner alleges any corrupt practice the petition shall also be accompanied by an affidavit ..... are to be treated on par with those relating to corrupt practices section 83 of the act requires an election petitioner .....

Sri Hari Shanker Prasad Vs. Shri Shahid Ali Khan and ors.

Court: Patna

..... a concise statement of the material fact material particulars are required only in respect of corrupt practice there is sea difference between the material facts and material particulars and this difference ..... in the election petition itself as no material particulars are to be included as no corrupt practice has been pleaded then the question of giving material particulars in the present election .....

Dr. Bhagwat Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jodhpur

Reported in: (2003)(1)SLJ49CAT

..... suggest was that since the applicant was prosecuted under the provisions of prevention of corruption act for allegedly accepting illegal gratification he could not be dealt with departmentally ..... above mentioned two cases in separate fields independent of the provisions of prevention of corruption act the competent disciplinary authority has unfettered power to proceed against the delinquent railway .....