Corruption - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: corruption Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 79 results (0.014 seconds)Farooqi (M.S.) Vs. Anti-corruption Commission (by Chairman and Members ...
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Oct-31-1966
Reported in: (1969)IILLJ78J& K
..... from proceeding against the petitioner under the jammu and kashmir government servants prevention of corruption commission act 1962 and respondent 4 be restrained from passing any order of suspension ..... distinguishing feature is that unlike the public servants inquiry act 1977 the prevention of corruption ordinance 2001 the civil services classification control and appeal rules 1956 and the civil .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdvocate General, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. Abbaraju Ramarao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-30-1966
Reported in: AIR1968AP207; 1968CriLJ888
anantanarayana ayyar j 1 in each of the three cases the learned advocate general is the petitioner and abba raju...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMysore Sugar Company Ltd. Vs. Manavendra (B.K.) and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-15-1966
Reported in: [1966(12)FLR434]; (1966)IILLJ463Kant; (1966)1MysLJ544
..... application for discharge allegations of abuse of official position sanction of credit facilities by corrupt and illegal means conspiracy and criminal misconduct financial loss to the complainant bank ..... for discharge allegations of abuse of official position sanction of credit facilities by corrupt and illegal means conspiracy and criminal misconduct financial loss to the complainant bank .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.V. Krishnan Nambissan Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-18-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1676; 1966CriLJ1347; [1966]3SCR373
..... the central government for an offence under s 6 1 a of the prevention of corruption act they put an objection that the sanctioning authority did not apply his mind properly .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaxman Sitaram Pai and anr. Vs. the State of Mysore
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-02-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Kant33; AIR1967Mys33; (1966)1MysLJ569
..... 1984 k a no 4 1985 section 9 v jagnnathan j investigation of offence under corruption act held police wing of lokayukta acts independently of lokayukta or upalokayukta sadre to prosecute .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGaneshmul Channilal Gandhi and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise an ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-30-1966
Reported in: AIR1968Kant89; AIR1968Mys89
..... 1984 k a no 4 1985 section 9 v jagnnathan j investigation of offence under corruption act held police wing of lokayukta acts independently of lokayukta or upalokayukta it was said .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTY.V. Srinivasamurthy Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Mysore
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-16-1966
Reported in: [1967]64ITR292(KAR); [1967]64ITR292(Karn)
..... period from date of notification after getting himself elected as a member no allegation of corrupt practice or any criminal charge held proceeding in question against petitioner is not quasi criminal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuryanarayana (H.) Vs. Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd. (by Managing Direc ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-04-1966
Reported in: [1966(12)FLR413]; (1967)ILLJ49Kant; (1966)1MysLJ465
..... 1984 k a no 4 1985 section 9 v jagnnathan j investigation of offence under corruption act held police wing of lokayukta acts independently of lokayukta or upalokayukta 3 articles of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: A.R.M. Manickam Chettiar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-28-1966
Reported in: 1968CriLJ256
..... legislative background of section 5 a of the act of 1947 when the prevention of corruption act was originally enacted section 3 contained the provision that offences punishable under sections 161 ..... as the preamble indicates to make more effective provisions for the prevention of bribery and corruption among public servants it introduced a defintion of the offence of criminal misconduct in discharging .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrakash Chand JaIn Vs. State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-19-1966
Reported in: 1968CriLJ391
..... obligatory presumption of law under section 4 of the prevention of corruption act could not be so repelled without actual proof of ..... of the presumption under section 4 of the prevention of corruption act as compared with other presumptions of law or fact ..... the above mentioned presumption under section 4 of the prevention of corruption act the admission of recovery of money could practically amount .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial