Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: copyright act 1957 chapter i preliminary Page 10 of about 4,452 results (0.110 seconds)

Colgate Palmolive Company and anr. Vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care P ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)228; 108(2003)DLT51; 2003(27)PTC478(Del); 2004(1)RAJ214

..... illiterate. the petitioner's case was that the petitioner has a distinctive design, colour scheme and get up which is an artistic work under the meaning of copyright act 1957 and his design was duly registered. its grievance was that respondent no. 2 was distributing khaini and gutkhasof various manufacturers all in pouches and/or sachets having ..... and get up of the label being original artistic work or to the ownership thereof is absolutely false as the plaintiffs claim the ownership of the copyright on the basis of certain averments and in the present suit they have taken a different stand inasmuch as that they have not pleaded the basic ..... has been manufacturing and marketing dental products in india under the trademark 'colgate'.3. the defendant, anchor health, is a company incorporated under the indian companies act, 1956 and carries on the business as manufacturers and marketersof dental products under the trademark 'anchor'. the defendant is in the said business since 1996. the .....

Syndicate of Press of the University of Cambridge Trading as Cambride ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2005(31)PTC58(Del)

..... that the defendants have acknowledged the authorship of the textbook from which defendant's work has been fairly taken which is in strict compliance with section 52 of the copyright act, 1957.(k) that the defendant's guides based on subject work of the plaintiff's, containing the alleged infringing work of the plaintiff are in market since july 2004. ..... upon their claim of originality and the right to limit the use and prevent the abuse of their creation.9. according to section 52(1)(h) of the copyright act, 1957, the reproduction of a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work as part of the questions be answered in an examination or in answers to such questions shall not ..... ...six languages fluently.9. 'how are you getting on with the book?' 9. 'how are you getting on with the book?'at the moment i...chapter four'. at the moment i...chapter four'.10. here we are in switzerland again. 10. here we are in switzerland again.we...in a very comfortable small we...in a very comfortable small .....

William Grant and Sons Ltd. Vs. Mcdowell and Compay Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)65; 55(1994)DLT80; 1994(30)DRJ105

..... scotland has been held to be objectionable. the glenfiddich label of the plaintiff constitutes an original artistic work within the meaning of section 2(c) of the indian copyright act, 1957 and is entitled to protection as such under the indian law by virtue of the membership of both india and the united kingdom to the berne convention and the ..... 14 of the plaint to the effect, 'the glenfid- dich label of the plaintiff constitutes an original artistic work within the meaning of section 2(c) of the indian copyright act, 1957 and is entitled to protection as such under the indian law............' (53) in my view, what mr. sen says is very clear from pleadings in para no.14 ..... , cannot be made subject matter of the design, postulated by section 2(v) of the designs act, 1911. (103) what i have said abaove, is clear from section 2(v)(i) of the trade and merchandise marks act which states: 'inrelation to chapter x (other than section 8), a registered trade mark or a mark used in relation to goods .....

Syndicate of Press of the University of Cambridge Trading as Cambridge ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(32)PTC487(Del)

..... their claim of originality and the right to limit the use and prevent the abuse of their creation.9. according to section 52(1)(h) of the copyright act, 1957, the reproduction of a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work as part of the questions be answered in an examination or in answers to such questions shall ..... the evening at present.8. philip is an excellent linguist. he .......................six languages fluently.9. `how are you getting on with the book?' at the moment i ......... chapter four'.10. here we are in switzerland again. we ....... in a very comfortable small hotel. key to exercises _ unit 1, 1.1, page 289answers, exercise_1.1_page ..... the evening at present.8. philip is an excellent linguist. he .......................six languages fluently.9. `how are you getting on with the book?' at the moment i ......... chapter four'.10. here we are in switzerland again. we ....... in a very comfortable small hotel .....1. even though sarah says she's feeling better, i think she .....

M/S Bhatia Industries and Others Vs. M/S Pandey Industries and Others

Court : Delhi

..... are selling their products under a distinctive label and trade dress, which constitute an original artistic work within the meaning of section 2(c) of the copyright act, 1957 and the copyright in that work vests in plaintiff no.1. defendant no.1 has obtained registration of this trademark in its favour since 19th july, 2004/28th ..... territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the present suit the plaintiff has invoked the jurisdiction of this hon'ble court under section 62(2) of the copyright act, 1957. further, the defendants have their business activities within the jurisdiction of this hon'ble court as they are selling the infringing goods within delhi in clandestine ..... april, 2006. the case of the plaintiffs is that the defendants having committed acts of infringement and passing of by adopting the trademark tiya and using the trade .....

A.Kamarunnisa Ghori. Vs. the Chairperson Prevention of Money Launderin ...

Court : Chennai

..... act, 2000paragraph-14offences under the emigration act, 1983paragraph-15offences under the passports act, 1967paragraph-16offences under the foreigners act, 1946paragraph-17offences under the copyright act, 1957paragraph-18offences under the trade marks act, 1999paragraph-19offences under the information technology act, 2000paragraph-20offences under the biological diversity act, 2002paragraph-21offences under the protection of plant varieties and farmers' rights act ..... dealt with in any manner which may result in frustrating any proceedings relating to confiscation of such proceeds of crime under this chapter,he may, by order in writing, provisionally attach such property for a period not exceeding one hundred and fifty days from ..... authority that an encumbrance on the property or leasehold interest has been created with a view to defeat the provisions of this chapter. therefore, it is clear that the vesting of the property under section 9, is not absolute even after an order of .....

Bikanervala Vs. New Bikanerwala

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2005(30)PTC113(Del)

..... mark of the plaintiff. it is alleged that the said artistic work of the plaintiff, which is fully depicted in annexure-a, is duly registered under the provisions of the copyright act, 1957. plaintiff in association with its sister concerns and franchisees/licensees has conducted sales in respect of its various products bearing the aforesaid trade mark for an amount of more than ..... ad interim injunction against the defendant in a suit filed by the plaintiff under section 27(2) of the act read with section 134(1) and 135 of the act and sections 51 and 55 of the copyright act, 1957 for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, passing ff and rendition of accounts. the suit has been filed with the averments and allegations that it is .....

Ford Motor Company and anr. Vs. Mrs. C.R. Borman and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT1; LC2008(3)418

..... it actually and voluntarily resides or carries business or personally works for gain'. this is also what is postulated by section 62(2) of the copyright act, 1957. it was for this reason that their lordships clarified that it was wholly irrelevant whether the defendant was selling its products in the place where the ..... arose in dhodha house was whether the existence of jurisdiction under copyright act, 1957 would also enable the clubbing of the dispute arising from the trade and merchandise act, 1958. the supreme court explained that existence of territorial jurisdiction by virtue of one act would not clothe that very court with the power for the ..... activity would become relevant and the plaintiff's activity would become irrelevant. if the plaint discloses that the defendant has violated the plaintiff's trademark or copyright in a particular place, the cause of action would arise therein and the observations in laxman prasad would clothe that court with jurisdiction.10. therefore .....

John Wiley and Sons Inc. and ors. Vs. International Book Store and anr ...

Court : Delhi

..... copies of such works, on his website.21. it would be necessary, at this stage, to reproduce certain relevant provisions of the copyright act, 1957; they are extracted below. section 2(m) defines 'infringing copy' of a copyrighted work, as follows:(m) 'infringing copy' means,-(i) in relation to a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, a ..... fifth plaintiff has granted the sixth plaintiff the right and license to reprint and distribute the abovementioned works amongst others for sale only in a specified territory; a copyright territory notice specifying that its books are meant for sale only in india, pakistan, nepal, bangladesh, sri lanka and bhutan.8. it is contended that the ..... like manner as if the author was a citizen of india at that date or time, and thereupon, subject to the provisions of this chapter and of the order, this act shall apply accordingly. provided that-(i) before making an order under this section in respect of any foreign country (other than a country with .....

Pfizer Enterprises Sarl Vs. Cipla Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2009(39)PTC358(Del)

..... where it 'actually and voluntarily resides or carries business or personally works for gain'. this is also what is postulated by section 62(2) of the copyright act, 1957. it was for this reason that their lordships clarified that it was wholly irrelevant whether the defendant was selling its products in the place where the suit ..... the primary ground upon which jurisdiction of the delhi high court had been invoked was violation of the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958 the provisions of section 62(2) of the copyright act, 1957 could not be invoked. this was also the ratio of dhodha house. it was also observed that the plaintiff in dhodha ..... which arose in dhodha house was whether the existence of jurisdiction under copyright act, 1957 would also enable the clubbing of the dispute arising from the trade and merchandise act, 1958. the supreme court explained that existence of territorial jurisdiction by virtue of one act would not clothe that very court with a determination of a dispute .....