Conveniences - Judgment Search Results

Lloyds Banking Group Plc Vs. Lloyds Tsb Foundation for Scotland

Court: UK Supreme Court

lord mance with whom lord reed and lord carnwath agree introduction 1 the issue on this appeal is how a...

M/S Nagindas Kasturchand and Others Vs. the Official Liquidator, High ...

Court: Mumbai

oral judgment 1 by this application filed by mr shashikant pasari who is a ex director of rajan textile mills...

Shah Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd. and Others Vs. Pravinchandra Hirji Shah ...

Court: Mumbai

had not run into a financial crunch 8 notices for convening an egm on may 24 2006 along with the requisite

Forbes and Company Ltd. and Another Vs. the Official Liquidator of the ...

Court: Mumbai

against the order of the learned single judge for the convening of the meeting and consequently dismissed the company application holding

M/S.Asian Power Controls Ltd. Vs. Mrs. Bubbles Goyal

Court: Mumbai

oral judgment dr d y chandrachud j these appeals arise from orders of the learned company judge initially admitting a...

Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. and Another Vs. Aviotech Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court: Mumbai

oral judgment 1 mentioned not on board taken on board 2 by an order dated 23rd august 2012 this court...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

ravindrav ghuge j 1 rule 2 rule made returnable forthwith by consent of the parties and heard the respective advocates...

. . . .Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... of the fundamental breach committed by the contractor and when the contract is terminated for convenience are materially different in fact these are diametrically opposite consequences which flow either from ..... authority keeping in view the entire circumstances wanted the contract to be terminated for convenience or wanted it to be treated as fundamental breach and terminate the contract on .....

Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. Vs. United States Dist. Court for Western ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a motion a district court should transfer the case unless extraordinary circumstances unrelated to the convenience of the parties clearly disfavor a transfer no such exceptional factors appear to be ..... we conclude a district court should transfer the case unless extraordinary circumstances unrelated to the convenience of the parties clearly disfavor a transfer in the present case both the district .....

Nagpur Distillers Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Kopargaon Sahakari Sakhar ...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

..... to be examined are mostly from nagpur thus the balance of convenience also required that the suit before the district judge kopargaon ..... the point that the possibility of contrary decisions and balance of convenience of all parties involved are established grounds on which a ..... the question depends on the interest of justice and not convenience of one party or the other h learned senior counsel .....