Conveniences - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: conveniences Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 3,743 results (0.049 seconds)Kisan Devka Pawar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-26-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALT(Cri)15; 2003BomCR(Cri)170; 2002(4)MhLj608
smt v k tahilramani j 1 we have heard mrs shobha gopal learned advocate appointed amicus curiae for the appellant...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDarshan Singh Ahuja Vs. Institute of Town Planner
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-07-2002
Reported in: 2003(70)DRJ740
vikramajit sen j 1 in the petition the claim is based on four bills aggregating rs 10 81 583 in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.K. Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Ansal Housing and Construction Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-03-2002
Reported in: 101(2002)DLT503; 2003(66)DRJ251
vikramajit sen j c a nos 654 656 2002 654 656 2002 in cp 227 2000 1 by orders dated...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Amalgamation of Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-18-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)ALLMR668; 2003(2)BomCR514; 2003(2)MhLj22
2002 and by an order dated 19th april 2002 the convening and holding of the meetings of the shareholders members and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Feedback Reach Consultancy Services Private Limited (Transferor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2002
Reported in: [2003]115CompCas897(Delhi); 101(2002)DLT501; 2003(66)DRJ356; [2003]42SCL82(Delhi)
vikramajit sen j 1 these petitioners have been filed under section 391 to 394 of the companies act praying for...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Highland Electro Appliances Private Limited;
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2002
Reported in: 2003(66)DRJ593; [2003]42SCL516(Delhi)
the transferor companies were also exempted from the requirement of convening the meetings of their creditors however by the same order
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.K. Oswal and ors. Vs. Mr. Akshay Finance and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2002
Reported in: [2003]115CompCas577(Delhi); [2004]50SCL303(Delhi)
vikramajit sen j ca 641 2002 642 20021 allowed subject to all just exceptions ca 685 686 2002 in cp...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGangubai Poonja Angre and anr. Vs. Mukesh Textile Mills and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-08-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)MhLj218; [2003]41SCL27(Bom)
d g deshpande j 1 all these revision applications involve common question therefore they have been disposed of by this...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSteel City Compto Aids Private Ltd. Vs. Tehmul Burjorji Bugli and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1296
m y eqbal j 1 this appeal under rules 6 and 9 of the companies court rules 1959 read with...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShadow Communications Vs. Prince Gutka Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2002
Reported in: [2003]116CompCas536(Delhi); (2003)2CompLJ262(Del); [2003]41SCL277(Delhi)
vikramajit sen j 1 the first question to be answered in this petition is whether the relief of winding up...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial