Containerful - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: containerful Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 310 results (0.045 seconds)Mahesh Chandra Purohit Vs. Container Corporation of India Ltd. and ors ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-21-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)WLC140; 2001(4)WLN671
..... the trailers trucks according to him on an average 100 trailed trucks containing containers will be moving towards the proposed container depot after its operation thus according to the petilioner the proposed ..... goes either in break bulk by trucks to twin ports of mumbai or through containers from inland container depot of rajasthan state industrial corporation at jodhpur which is not found to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Suraj Containers Ltd. and Vs. C.C.E., Calcutta-i
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Jul-16-2001
..... the records maintained by the company did not show the production and removal of tin containers in question shri sengupta further disclosed that the said goods have been manufactured in the ..... the vehicle and imposition of personal penalty upon the second appellant i observe that metal containers were being transported under cover of challan and invoice issued by oriental distributors i driver .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Express TIn Containers (P) Vs. C.C.E., Calcutta-ii
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Jul-24-2001
..... consumption of their input tin plates in the manufacture of tin containers much more than what was required for the manufacture of their ..... 711 kgs of tin plates and 13 797 pcs of metal containers were manufactured the average weight comes to 2 443 kgs he ..... with the normal input output ratio of the tin plates and metal containers as such the impugned order requiring the appellants to reverse modvat .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Suraj Containers Ltd. and Md. Vs. Cce, Calcutta-i
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Jan-30-2001
Reported in: (2001)(131)ELT350Tri(Kol.)kata
..... with predeposit of penalty of rs 7500 imposed upon m s suraj containers ltd and an equal amount of penalty imposed on md m d ..... in confiscation of the said goods giving option to m s suraj containers to redeem the same on payment of a fine of rs 20 ..... k chattopadhyay ld jdr appearing for the revenue while reiterating the reasoning contained in the impugned order refers to the decision of the hon ble .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Central Vs. M/S. Vijaya Seamless Containers
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Aug-07-2001
Reported in: (2001)(135)ELT107Tri(Bang.)
..... which is converted into cartons and used for packing of the end product namely aluminium containers it is a case of the department that item as such was not used directly ..... extended on the other hand it was the case of the respondent that invariably aluminium containers are packed in cartons and the cost of the cartons used for packing are included .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMarine Container Services (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rajesh Dhirajlal Vora
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-21-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)ALLMR699; (2002)104BOMLR273
..... seagold finance and investment services pvt ltd and m s omega international container against one dhirajlal hakimchand vora for a money decree in the amount ..... made by the arbitrator under the 1996 act in other words nothing contained in article 3 of schedule i of the bombay court fees act ..... j 1 suit no 3844 of 1999 is filed by marine container services i pvt ltd m s seagate trading and investment pvt .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTito Vs. H.A. Containers
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-03-2001
Reported in: (2004)87TTJ(Mumbai)729
..... act 1961 the act determining the total income at rs 60 960 assessee had declared container hire charges at rs 6 19 460 and the p l a c showed total ..... modify an award made by the arbitrator under the 1996 act in other words nothing contained in article 3 of schedule i of the bombay court fees act applies to an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat Container Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-28-2001
..... the credit was rightly taken further notification 16 94 which prescribes documents for taking credit contains in serial no 10 to its table endorsed gate passes subsidiary gate passes certificates although .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUniversal Cans and Containers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-30-2001
Reported in: (2002)(139)ELT182Tri(Mum.)bai
1 the appellant cleared from its factory on 30 6 1986 a consignment of tin containers intended to store toothpowder there was a delay in the arrival of the goods at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVardhaman Containers and Papers Vs. Punjab National Bank
Court: DRAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2001
1 heard the appellant was not a party before the tribunal below and the case of the appellant is that...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial