Consumer Protection Act 1986 Section 12 - Judgment Search Results

Prardumna Rai Vs. District Consumer Forum

Court : Assam State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Gauhati

..... authorized to appear and conduct the case on behalf of the lady complainant consumer protection act 1986 sections 12 15 assam state consumer protection rules 1989 rules 2 b 4 8 comparative citation 2003 3 cpj 318 ..... the district forum but the district forum by relying on the provision of section 12 of the consumer protection act did not allow the person concerned to represent the lady a bare look .....

Ved Rattan Vs. Chief Executive Officer, Tata Power Co. Ltd. and Others

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... accordingly the same is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs appeal dismissed consumer protection act 1986 section 12 section 15 comparative citation 2003 1 cpj 180 ..... president 1 the present appeal filed by the appellant under section 15 of the consumer protection act 1986 hereinafter referred to as the act is directed against order dated 31st may 2002 passed by district .....

Sanjay R. Kothari and anr. Vs. South Mumbai Consumer Disputes Redressa ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2003Bom15; 2002(4)ALLMR617; 2002(6)BomCR637; (2002)4BOMLR760; 2003(1)MhLj804

..... absolute accordingly 34 no costs consumer protection act 1986 sections 2 1 b ii and 12 maharashtra consumer protection rules 2000 rules 4 7 8 7 and 9 6 advocates act 1961 section 33 bar councils act 1926 section 14 authorised agents right .....

Mrs. Kanak Verma Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. and Another

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... consumer protection act 1986 section 15 cases referred 1991 2 cpj 286 nc 1986 95 consumer 878 ns 1991 1 cpj 48 nc 1986 95 consumer 793 ns 1986 95 consumer ..... had filed a complaint before the district forum under section 12 of the act averring therein that she had been receiving bills ..... by this commission in exercise of its appellate powers 12 in view of the position explained above the present .....

Jai Prakash Saini Vs. Director, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Rese ...

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... parties are left to bear their own costs complaint dismissed consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g cases referred 1993 3 cpj 7 sc 1986 95 consumer 278 sc 1995 3 cpj 1 sc jt 1995 8 ..... the contentions advanced by the opposite parties and reiterating the averments made in the complaint 12 the parties have adduced evidence by means of affidavits the complainant shri jai prakash saini .....

S.L. Khera Vs. Chief Administrator, Punjab Urban Development Authority

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

the appeal filed by the appellant has been partly allowed consumer protection act 1986 section 21 limitation section 24 a comparative are to be made available to consumer for the better protection of his interest against the provider of service we allow filed by the appellant has been partly allowed consumer protection act 1986 section 21 limitation section 24 a comparative citations 2003 representation to the respondents vide application dated 18 25 8 1986 within 30 days of the allotment letter for allotting him complaint case was summoned the appellant moved an application under section 24a of the consumer protection act 1986 for short hereinafter

Smt. Abha Ballani Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... stands disposed of in above terms complaint disposed of consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 g section 17 cases referred 1995 57 dlt 801 fb air ..... thereto the complainant was allotted a ground floor flat in dwarka section 12 pocket block i delhi vide allotment letter dated 20 30 11 ..... unjustified the complainant had also issued a legal notice dated 6 12 1996 to the o p and since no response was .....

Delhi Vidyut Board Vs. D.N. Shukla

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... of these cases the parties are left to bear their own costs appeals allowed consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 c cases referred air 1996 sc 2258 1995 2 cpj 132 nc ..... were being disputed by the respondents and the respondents had filed separate complaints under section 12 of the consumer protection act 1986 hereinafter referred to as the act before the district forum praying for .....

i.P. Katyal, Chief Executive, Asim Engineers and Consultants Vs. Poles ...

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... being raised in the present complaint as the complainant may be advised complaint disposed of consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 d comparative citations 2003 1 clt 64 2002 2 cpj 470 ..... the agreement to pay the commission upto 10 for peerless order was endorsed on 19 12 1995 by dr k lastoweicki director of the o p while he was pursuing to .....

Bippinjit Singh and Another Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

piece of legislation enacted for a better protection of the consumers for the fault which has been committed by the appellant learned counsel for o p nos 2 to 4 consumer protection act 1986 section 15 comparative citation 2004 3 cpj 190 as such he suffered the impugned order the consumer protection act 1986 for short hereinafter referred to as the c p for o p nos 2 to 4 consumer protection act 1986 section 15 comparative citation 2004 3 cpj 190 o p nos 2 to 4 consumer protection act 1986 section 15 comparative citation 2004 3 cpj 190