Consumer Protection Act 1986 Section 12 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: consumer protection act 1986 section 12 Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 564 results (0.896 seconds)Modern Threads (India) Ltd. and Others. Vs. Lt. Col. B.K. Sharma and O ...
Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on : Jan-28-2000
..... stand disposed of in above terms appeals dismissed consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 d section 2 1 o cases referred 1993 3 cpj 7 sc 1986 95 consumer 278 sc 1994 1 scc 243 1993 3 ..... respondents the respondents filed separate complaints against the appellant before the district forum under section 12 of the act with the prayer that the appellant be directed to refund the amount of deposits .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorld Link Finance Ltd. Vs. M.R. Dixit
Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on : Jan-21-2000
..... of litigation expenses the appeals mentioned above stand disposed of in above terms appeals dismissed consumer protection act 1986 section 15 cases referred 1993 3 cpj 7 sc 1994 1 scc 243 1993 3 cpj ..... respondents the respondents filed separate complaints against the appellant before the district forum under section 12 of the act with the prayer that the appellant be directed to refund the amount of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZuari Agro Chemicals Ltd. Vs. the Chief General Manager, Mahanagar Tel ...
Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on : Sep-20-2000
..... proceedings the present complaint is disposed of in above terms complaint disposed of consumer protection act 1986 section 17 12 section 2 1 g cases referred 1992 1 cpj 47 nc 1997 2 cpj ..... present complaint under section 17 of the consumer protection act 1986 hereinafter referred to as the act the case of the complainant is that the complainant was the subscriber of 12 telephone lines including .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTY. Krishan Vs. M.T.N.L.
Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on : Aug-01-2000
..... to bear their own costs appeal disposed of consumer protection act 1986 section 15 cases referred 1993 3 cpj 335 nc 1995 2 ..... appellant had filed a complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act 1986 hereinafter referred to as the act before the district forum averring therein ..... rohtak haryana reported as ii 1995 cpj 18 nc 1986 96 consumer 2447 ns we are in complete agreement with .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.K. Jetly Vs. Kamal Sharma and Another
Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Decided on : Nov-28-2000
7 2000 implemented under section 25 or 27 of the consumer protection act 1986 as the case may be so far getting the order implemented under section 27 of the consumer protection act 1986 even now the complainant can if so advised the order implemented under section 27 of the consumer protection act 1986 even now the complainant can if so advised approach supplied to the parties free of charges consumer protection act 1986 sections 14 1 d 15 comparative citations 2001 1 cpc the opposite parties would be liable to be punished under section 27 of the consumer protection act 1986 the district forum
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTL.R. Gupta and Another. Vs. Singapore Airlines Ltd.
Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on : Sep-27-2000
..... which the said amounts would carry interest of 12 per annum from the date of order till actual payment complaint allowed with costs consumer protection act 1986 section 11 2 case referred 1998 1 cpj 26 ..... nc 1986 99 con c 4420 comparative citations 2002 1 cpc 177 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFaqir Chand Gulati Vs. Uppal Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on : Oct-04-2000
..... case however there is no order as to costs appeal dismissed consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 d cases referred 1996 1 cpj 81 nc 1995 ..... builder and cannot be adjudicated upon under the provisions of the act 12 therefore in view of the above decisions we uphold the view ..... obtaining the same from the mcd however in this regard clause 12 of the collaboration agreement is very relevant that the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.K. Gupta Vs. New High Flying Travels Pvt. Ltd. and Another
Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on : Aug-07-2000
..... the total of said amounts 12 p a till payment 22 the present complaint stands disposed of in above terms complaint allowed with costs consumer protection act 1986 section 2 1 d cases ..... complainant named above has filed the present complaint under section 17 of the consumer protection act 1986 hereinafter referred to as the act averring therein that the complainant had purchased tickets from .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrij Mohan Khanna and Others Vs. Punjab Urban Planning and Development ...
Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Decided on : Jul-21-2000
under section 2 1 b is comprehensive to enable the consumer as well as any voluntary consumer association central government state pay costs rs 2 000 each to the complainant consumer protection act 1986 sections 2 1 g 14 1 d case the provision of punjab regional and town planning and development act 1995 and the rules and regulations made thereunder the allottee rs 2 000 each to the complainant consumer protection act 1986 sections 2 1 g 14 1 d case referred 1 2 000 each to the complainant consumer protection act 1986 sections 2 1 g 14 1 d case referred 1 ii
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.L. Singhal Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.
Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on : Aug-01-2000
..... present appeal is disposed of in above terms appeal dismissed consumer protection act 1986 section 15 case referred 1994 1 cpj 23 nc 1986 1995 consumer 1013 ns comparative citations 2000 3 cpj 140 ..... facts are that the appellant had filed a complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act 1986 hereinafter referred to as the act before the district forum averring therein that the telephone .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT