Consumer Dispute - Judgment Search Results

Deepa Vs. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2006(1)KLT778

decree under Order XXI of CPC or the provisions of Consumer Protection Act with regard to execution of orders passed by adverse observations made against her, by the 1st respondent Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kannur, in an order passed by it. Seeking

Sanjay R. Kothari and anr. Vs. South Mumbai Consumer Disputes Redressa ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2003Bom15; 2002(4)ALLMR617; 2002(6)BomCR637; (2002)4BOMLR760; 2003(1)MhLj804

party concerned but it is for prosecuting the case before Consumer Forum. In other words, appearance of consumer or his authorised permits recognised agents to be appointed.........'. There cannot be any dispute over the proposition laid down by this Court in the

Tiptur Taluk Agricultural Producers Co-operative Marketing Society Lim ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2003Kant307; ILR2003KAR1821; 2003(4)KarLJ18

the two orders because it was their contention that as consumers who had availed of the services of the Society for for settlement of disputes- (1) For the purpose of settling disputes between producers, buyers and sellers, or their agents including any

General Manager, Telecom District, Trivandrum and ors. Vs. Consumer Di ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1998Ker110; [1998]94CompCas717(Ker)

resorting to the machinery under the Act is only the consumer disputes whereas the disputes that may be settled under Section 2nd respondent with regard to submission of jurisdiction to resolve disputes and therefore the 2nd respondent can only resort to the

General Manager, Telecom District, Trivandrum and ors. Vs. Consumer Di ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR2000Ker250

intended that such a result should happen by Implementing the Consumer Protection Act intended to benefit the consumers in general and the Central Government either specially for the determination of that dispute or generally for the determination of disputes under this section.

Mandira Mookerjee Vs. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum and o ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2005Cal108,2005(4)CHN694

other for the purpose of excluding the jurisdiction of the Consumer Forum.7.1. That apart, the Specific Relief Act is a law interest or costs, parties could be precluded from referring the dispute to arbitration.'7.3. True that this decision was related to arbitration

Anand Kumar JaIn Vs. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhopa ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(2)MPHT430; 2002(3)MPLJ594

purpose of this Section 'recognised consumer association' means any voluntary consumer association registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), transaction was not complete on 28-4-1992. However, it is not disputed that the petitioner had issued a cheque after deducting his

Kerala Hotel and Restaurant Association Vs. Thrissur District Consumer ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2012(3)KLT277

Act. Accordingly, Ext.P1 complaint is quashed. The 1st respondent-Thrissur District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum is directed not to proceed further with Accordingly, Ext.P1 complaint is quashed. The 1st respondent-Thrissur District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum is directed not to proceed further with Ext.P1

K a Nagamani vs.national Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission & Anr

Court: Delhi

an order passed for enforcement of an order relating a consumer complaint would not fall within the definition of the term order passed the Supreme Court. Thus, insofar as the consumer dispute is concerned the same stands adjudicated in terms of the

Atul Ch. Sarma Vs. President, District Consumer Disputes Redressal For ...

Court: Guwahati

proceeding being No. CPC No. 250/94 pending before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Kamrup Guwahati is hereby quashed.8. In the being No. CPC No. 250/94 pending before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Kamrup Guwahati is hereby quashed.8. In the result,