Constitution - Judgment Search Results

Mrs. Pushpa P. Mulchandani and ors. (All Petitioners Through Constitut ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(2)ARBLR284(Bom); 2001(1)BomCR592; (2001)1BOMLR169; 2000(4)MhLj819

..... jurisdiction the only proceedings excepted by the explanation are proceedings under article 226 of the constitution he contends that in the absence of a specific exception as to the application of ..... india said observations directions are issued in exercise of powers under article 142 of the constitution and also have no application to the cases relating to appointments and are restricted to .....

Hans Raj Agarwal and Another Vs. Appropriate Authority Constituted Und ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(4)ALD33; 2000(4)ALT215; [2000]246ITR232(AP)

..... by the same petitioners in wp no 17315 of 1989 the constitutional validity of the provisions of chapter xx c was mainly in ..... would disentitle them to any relief under article 226 of the constitution on the ground that the second statement should not have been ..... be questioned on any ground germane to article 226 of the constitution 33 although a contention has been raised in the writ petition .....

Lemuir Air Express Iata Cargo Agent Vs. Air India, Government Corporat ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2001)1MLJ783

..... suit has been filed on averments such as that the plaintiff is a government corporation constituted under the air corporation act 1953 that the first defendant carries on business and it .....

Troxel Vs. Granville

Court: US Supreme Court

..... defined age of majority minors as well as adults are protected by the constitution and possess constitutional rights tinker v des moines independent community school dist 393 u s 503 ..... court of appeals view that limitation on nonparental visitation actions was consistent with the constitutional restrictions on state interference with parents fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and .....

Sukanta Mukherjee Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2000)3CALLT147(HC)

..... fit these provisions into this kind of compartmentallsation in the context and scheme of our constitutional provisions by now it is well settled that reservations in educational institutions and other walks ..... the policy decision is either a capricious unreasonable and arbitrary or is violative of any constitutional or statutory mandate court s interference is not warranted the policy in the instant .....

Babu Premarajan Vs. Superintendent of Police, Kasaragode and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR2000Ker417

..... powers this unlimited jurisdiction has been conferred on the high courts since they are constitutional courts of record the state legislature or union legislature has no power to curtail modify ..... legislature cannot impose any fetters on the discretionary power of a learned judge the constitution has delineated delicate balance in the exercise of sovereign power by legislature executive and judiciary .....

State of Karnataka Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC1560; JT2000(6)SC1; 1999(4)SCALE332; (2000)9SCC572

..... above amply represents the true meaning and purport of article 131 of the constitution it is a constitutional conferment of jurisdiction in regard to certain specified matters which is required to ..... of mobilising funds and providing sufficient funds to complete irrigation projects the constitution of kbjnl has been constituted with the sole idea to complete the works of upper krishna projects .....

Hills Syndicate Vs. North Cachar Hills Autonomous Council and ors.

Court: Guwahati

..... that the district councils and the regional councils contemplated in the sixth schedule to the constitution are allowed more and more poweres for healthy functioning of democracy and for speedy and ..... presidential election 1974 air 1974 sc 1682 for the propsition that no provision of the constitution or of any other enactment can be construed so as to destroy another provision contemporaneously .....

United States Vs. Morrison

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at 308 the statutory remedy does not in any sense purport to determine what constitutes a constitutional violation flores supra at 519 it intrudes little upon either states or private ..... relevant characteristic of an interstatecommerce affecting cause how local it is while placing critical constitutional weight upon a different less obviously relevant feature how economic it is most importantly .....

Miller Vs. French

Court: US Supreme Court

..... when the termination motion can be decided such an automatic termination could leave constitutionally prohibited conditions unremedied at least temporarily alternatively the threat of termination could lead ..... error the same interpretation avoids the improper provisional termination of relief that is constitutionally necessary the risk of an occasional small additional delay seems a comparatively .....