Constitution - Judgment Search Results

Widmar Vs. Vincent

Court: US Supreme Court

..... theater was a public forum city could not exclude a production without satisfying constitutional safeguards applicable to prior restraints the university s institutional mission which it describes ..... international society for krishna consciousness inc which assumed that religious appeals to nonbelievers constituted protected speech rather the dissent seems to attempt a distinction between the kinds .....

Parratt Vs. Taylor

Court: US Supreme Court

..... substantive rights can only be regarded as minimal imposing additional administrative safeguards as a constitutional requirement might reduce that risk marginally but would also entail a significant intrusion ..... the existence of the statutory cause of action means that every expansion of constitutional rights through 1983 will increase the caseload of already overburdened federal courts this increase .....

H. L. Vs. Matheson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... minors as well as adults are protected by the constitution and possess constitutional rights see e g breed v jones 421 u ..... minors who assert the identical claim that appellant presents a constitutional right to an abortion without notifying their parents and without ..... present the question whether that holding is consistent with the constitution of the united states the court however declines to reach .....

Chandler Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... must be examined carefully to evaluate the claim that it represents a per se constitutional rule forbidding all electronic coverage chief justice warren and justices douglas and goldberg joined ..... ultimate holding of estes justice harlan began by observing that the question of the constitutional permissibility of televised trials was one fraught with unusual difficulty permitting television in the .....

Mian Bashir Ahmad and Etc. Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

..... members and the state legislatures and their members in our country for the union constitution and state constitution are both based on the british model in fact the supreme court has expressly ..... thus appear that by making this clause subject only to the specified provisions of the constitution the constitution makers wanted to make it clear that they thought it necessary to confer on .....

Plumbers and Pipefitters Vs. Plumbers and Pipefitters

Court: US Supreme Court

..... union against petitioner parent international union alleging a violation of the international union s constitution arising from the international union s issuance of an order requiring consolidation of ..... unqualified term contract without intending to encompass that category of contracts represented by union constitutions nothing in the language and legislative history of 301 a suggests any special .....

Allstate Ins. Co. Vs. Hague

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and subsequent appointment in minnesota as personal representative of her late husband s estate constitute a minnesota contact which gives minnesota an interest in respondent s recovery an interest ..... and purposes gave an isolated event the writing of the bond in tennessee controlling constitutional significance even though there might have been contacts with another state there mississippi which .....

H.Y. Harish Vs. Selection Committee for Selection and Admissionto Gove ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1981Kant239

..... government in the relevant government order providing for reservations under article 15 4 of the constitution in educational institutions of the state his claim was also certified by the appropriate ..... made by it is violative of the principles of natural justice 16 a selection committee constituted for selecting candidates for admission to technical courses where thousands of applicants will have .....

Gurusiddappa Nurandappa UppIn and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1981KAR751; [1982]49STC192(Kar)

..... that such taxation is illegal or refusing to uphold such taxation without referring to any constitutional provision prohibiting it moreover notwithstanding express declarations of some of the courts that double ..... 103itr82 sc while taxation laws cannot claim immunity from the equality clause of the constitution in view of the intrinsic complexity of fiscal adjustments of diverse elements there is .....

S.N. Nagaraja Rao Vs. Chikkachennappa and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1981(1)KarLJ201

..... objection raised to the maintainability of this petition presented under article 215 of the constitution of india read with the provisions of the to contempt of courts act 1971 ..... by unscrupulous persons by filing frivolous petitions the advocate general having regard to his high constitutional position has been entrusted with the duty and responsibility of scrutinising a petition intended .....