Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Sorted by: recent Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 302 results (1.577 seconds)Sachdeva and Sons Vs. Collector of Customs
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-31-1986
Reported in : (1987)(29)ELT917Tri(Mum.)bai
chandigarh and opened letter of credit through central bank of india m s r r engineering corporation had delivered the goods body of persons desirous of being authorised to mark any article with a grade designation mark shall apply to the agricultural by the agricultural marketing adviser were in pursuance of the powers conferred on him under the basmati rice export grading and the inspecting officer for sampling and design it also provided procedure for drawing up samples their analysis and determination of grade contained in ray s foreign exchange regulations act 1973 he therefore submitted that the appeal should be dismissed 5 we have
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJayashree Insulators Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Dec-31-1986
Reported in : (1987)(28)ELT279TriDel
in exercise of the jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india he had placed reliance on those observations to of the observations of the supreme court in the dunlop india case relating to the making of interim orders there was grant of stay ostensibly in exercise of the jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india he had placed reliance shri ajwani filed copies of the tribunal s order no 368 1984a dated 29 5 84 in the case of messrs latter is in the exercise of the incidental and ancillary powers of the appellate authority vide the decision of the supreme to the possibility of an equal division in those circumstances parliament had provided that the points of difference shall be decided of section 129c 5 of the customs act 1962 as amended also applicable to central excise matters which reads as follows p filed by spencer sc co ltd s l p civil no 7762 of 1984 against our order refusing to dispose provide much guidance on the question before me it is therefore better to go by the interpretation which the provision in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJaIn Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs and Central
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-31-1986
Reported in : (1987)(11)LC545Tri(Mum.)bai
before the supreme court under article 133 1 of the constitution of india an appeal would lie to the supreme court had certified under article 134 a of the constitution of india the appeals involve a substantial question of law of general the fact that the delhi high court had certified under article 134 a of the constitution of india the appeals involve while the hon ble high court in writ cases has powers to travel beyond the limits of the customs act 1962 to leave it to them to apply to courts or parliament or legislatures as the case may be to put the provisions under article 133 came to be incorporated by 30th amendment act 1972 which came into effect on 27 2 1973 justice khanna s judgment when such has been the strategical procedure adopted by the petitioner i should not have been inclined coming to the conclusion that the import was illegal these therefore could not again be urged now before the tribunal as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTElectronic Devices Vs. Collector of Customs
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Dec-31-1986
Reported in : (1987)(12)ECC50
revision application to the additional secretary revision application government of india ministry of finance department of revenue new delhi being aggrieved blown sound signalling instruments parts and accessories of the above articles prepared media for sound or similar recording sound recorded or gopinath has argued that the bench should exercise its inherent powers and order the correct classification of the imported item shri say and if the general scheme of an act of parliament obviously calls for and to be read as or as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBurn Standard Company Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Dec-31-1986
Reported in : (1987)(11)ECC102
reported in 1985 20 elt 179 had held that to constitute manufacture it is not necessary that one should absolutely make ble supreme court judgment in the case of union of india v delhi cloth mills reported in air 1963 sc 791 difference in identity between the original commodity and the processed article it is not possible to say that one commodity has arguments he has also referred to the following judgments steel authority of india ltd v collector of central excise calcuttaperfco foundry of india v delhi cloth and general mills and ors civil appeal nos 168 170 of 1980 order dated 12 10 degrees of transformation and labour and skill spent are irrelevant therefore the question of whether a particular process is a process
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOmrao Industrial Corpn. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad
Decided on : Dec-31-1986
Reported in : (1987)20ITD739(All.)
the additions were made to the trading result would not constitute fraud or gross or wilful neglect unless it can be were different he refers to the decision in cit v india sea foods 1976 105 itr 708 ker in which it of jurisdiction initially but must also be clothed with the power to decide the matter when the final order is made itr 473 in which it was held that after the amendment of section 274 2 with effect from 1 4 1971 had discharged the burden cast by the above provision and therefore the burden of proof had shifted to the revenue to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSrinivasa Metal Works Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : Dec-31-1986
Reported in : (1987)20ITD768(Hyd.)
matter related to the amendment to section 34 of the indian income tax act 1922 the 1922 act this amendment enlarged tax act 1922 the 1922 act this amendment enlarged the power of reassessment by the ito at any time to give shri satyanarayana 16 although we have already held that the amendment of section 263 will not clothe the commissioner with the no vested rights regarding procedural law he submitted that the procedure is only the machinery of the ground in dealing with 1975 refers to the profits from the benami firms we therefore do not see any reason why the statement of sambaiah
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Krovvidi Subbalakshmi Vs. Gift-tax Officer
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : Dec-31-1986
Reported in : (1987)22ITD235(Hyd.)
for avoiding disputes a family settlement is reached that itself constitutes adequate consideration and therefore gift tax would not be attracted those circumstances the question is whether there can be any scope for a family settlement to be reached it is also not create or extinguish any rights in immovable properties and therefore does not fall within the mischief of s 17 2
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB. Narayana Reddy Vs. Inspecting Assistant
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on : Dec-31-1986
Reported in : (1987)21ITD422(Hyd.)
under the act and not on assumptions and presumptions the power has to be exercised with full responsibility circumspection earnestness and rs 1 05 225 only it is difficult to imagine therefore that the first floor will be a further value of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWimco Limited Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on : Dec-30-1986
Reported in : (1990)(46)ELT53TriDel
under order dated 31 10 1980 the order read the board observes that in this case on the same issue a board rejects this appeal as not made to the proper authority the appellants preferred a revision petition to the central government of this smt saxena has nothing further to urge we therefore hold that in the present instance also the matter has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT