Skip to content


Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Sorted by: old Court: guwahati Year: 1964 Page 1 of about 13 results (1.113 seconds)
Jan 10 1964 (HC)

Devendra Chandra Paul Vs. Haridas Deb and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-10-1964

the provisions of section 540 of the code of criminal procedure he did nothing of the kind he did not even of payment of compensation must be set aside 10 i therefore accept the reference and set aside the order passed by

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 18 1964 (HC)

Biren Datta and ors. Vs. the Chief Commissioner of Tripura

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-18-1964

3o i b under which they have been detained is constitutionally invalid because it contravenes their fundamental rights under articles 14 india and that constituted a threat to the security of india that is why on the 26th of october 1962 the any court for the enforcement of the rights conferred by articles 21 and 22 of the constitution for the period during old rule 2 of the said rules and all others powers enabling in that behalf shri s p mukherji the administrator framed by the central government were published then followed an amendment of the presidential order on the 11th november 1962 by this court under section 491 i b of the criminal procedure code with the allegation that they have been improperly and reduced it into writing as is evident by the record therefore there was a full compliance of the rules in the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 04 1964 (HC)

Pradip Kumar Das Vs. the State and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-04-1964

cases for securing the ends of justice being an extraordinary power it will however not be pressed in aid except for this court under section 561a of the code of criminal procedure directing expunction of certain remarks made by the magistrate first by their lordships of the supreme court 5 the petition therefore fails and is dismissed apparently the learned magistrate was satisfied

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 20 1964 (HC)

U. Bithiang Malngiang and ors. Vs. the State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-20-1964

under paragraph 4 4 of the sixth schedule to the constitution of india with the approval of the governor of assam 147 indian penal code 4 the case under section 342 indian penal code stands on a different footing there is no penal code the district council in the exercise of the powers conferred under paragraph 4 4 of the sixth schedule to any court it shall observe in such trial the same procedure which mat court would have observed if the case had

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 1964 (HC)

Jwala Prasad Agarwala Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Assam.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-21-1964

3 the decision by the income tax tribunal does not constitute res judicata regarding the second circumstance relied upon by the and partnership have the same meanings respectively as in the indian partnership act 1932 ix of 1932 provided that the expression year of every individual hindu undivided family company and local authority and of every firm and other association of persons or and not the result of his deposit in our opinion therefore both the questions referred to us are to be answered

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 1964 (HC)

State Vs. Ganga Ram Kalita and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-09-1964

a high court by the letters patent or other instrument constituting such high court no court when it has signed its filed and in the absence of the authority exercising the powers of revision namely the sessions judge or the district magistrate having regard to section 369 of the code of criminal procedure which is as follows save as otherwise provided by this

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 1964 (HC)

BadaruddIn Ahmed Vs. C.K. Thakuria and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Apr-10-1964

court of session for taking his trial under section 330 indian penal code he further thought that there was a prima connection by their lordships of the supreme court generally the power to commit depends upon the finding that there is a under sections 211 and 213 of the code of criminal procedure

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 04 1964 (HC)

ijat Ali Vs. the State

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-04-1964

and not for their production for any offence under the indian passport act as mentioned in the police report submitted subsequently the appeal should be set aside as illegal and without jurisdiction and the appeal should be reheard on merits by the the order dated 1 11 62 is illegal because no criminal appeal is liable to be dismissed merely for the absence that the order of the magistrate is illegal and cannot therefore be maintained 6 under section 515 cr p c appeal

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 1964 (HC)

Kshetrimayum Radha Singh Vs. Government of Manipur

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-14-1964

court but elsewhere in that case certain courts alone have jurisdiction to determine whether the bond has been forfeited the second special proceedings about which there are specific directions in the code and they must be strictly followed section 499 cr p were 3 separate transactions and not one as alleged previously therefore he split them into 8 cases and after completion of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 03 1964 (HC)

Kitab All Munshi and ors. Vs. Santi Ranjan Deb

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-03-1964

10 1 g and article 25 1 of the indian constitution and it was contended on behalf of the petitioners in i p c have not been denned anywhere in the indian penal code but has argued that there can be no do such acts are subject to some important limitations under article 25 1 wnicn is as follows subject to public order that decision a religion may not only lay down a code of ethical rules for its followers to accept it might pressed in arguments the application for revision is without substance therefore it is rejected for deliberately wounding the religious feeling of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //