Conscienceless - Judgment Search Results

Gregg Vs. Georgia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... court of florida has ruled that the phrase especially heinous atrocious or cruel means a conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim state v dixon 283 so .....

Proffitt Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... consequence the court has indicated that the eighth statutory provision is directed only at the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim state v dixon 283 so .....

Bachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;

..... consequence the court has indicated that the eighth statutory provision is directed only at the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily tortuous to the victim 207 it appears to us .....

Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; [1983]1SCR145a

..... consequence the court has indicated that the eighth statutory provision is directed only at the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily tortuous to the victim 207 it appears to us .....

Mian Bashir Ahmad and Etc. Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

..... as the legislators are virtually told that after their elections they would become soulless and conscienceless entities and would have to be driven like dumb cattle in whichever direction the political ..... form judgment and no liberty to think for themselves but they must become soulless and conscienceless entities who would be driven by their political party in whichever direction the party chooses .....

Parkash Singh Badal and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1987P& H263

..... form judgment and no liberty to think for themselves but they must become soulless and conscienceless entities who would be driven by their political party in whichever direction the party chooses ..... form judgment and no liberty to think for themselves but they must become soulless and conscienceless entities who would be driven by their political party in whichever direction the party chooses .....

Clemons Vs. Mississippi

Court: US Supreme Court

..... especially heinous factor a constitutional limiting construction narrowing that category to murders that are conscienceless or pitiless and unnecessarily torturous to the victim id at 1363 citing coleman v ..... be expected to interpret the words especially heinous atrocious or cruel as signifying the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim coleman did not seek .....

Lewis Vs. Jeffers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... ground that the supreme court of florida had restricted the circumstance to include only the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim in godfrey v georgia supra .....

Sochor Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the crime apart from the norm of capital felonies the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim ..... factor as defined in dixon to apply only to a conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim ..... had construed the heinousness factor to apply only to the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim .....

Tuilaepa Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... various mitigating questions not unconstitutionally vague nor is the question whether the crime was a conscienceless or pitiless crime which wa s unnecessarily torturous to the victim internal quotation marks omitted .....