Skip to content


Conscienceless - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: conscienceless Page 1 of about 13 results (0.056 seconds)
Feb 15 2002 (HC)

Vishwaprakash S/O Laxman Sirsath Aged: 45 Years, Occu.: Service, R/O 6 ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR664; (2002)4BOMLR176; 2003(2)MhLj176

1 we have heard the learned counsel for thepetitioners as well as in the connected group ofpetitions which have raised...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 1990 (FN)

Clemons Vs. Mississippi

Court: US Supreme Court

..... especially heinous factor a constitutional limiting construction narrowing that category to murders that are conscienceless or pitiless and unnecessarily torturous to the victim id at 1363 citing coleman v ..... be expected to interpret the words especially heinous atrocious or cruel as signifying the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim coleman did not seek .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 1981 (HC)

Mian Bashir Ahmad and Etc. Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

..... as the legislators are virtually told that after their elections they would become soulless and conscienceless entities and would have to be driven like dumb cattle in whichever direction the political ..... form judgment and no liberty to think for themselves but they must become soulless and conscienceless entities who would be driven by their political party in whichever direction the party chooses .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 08 1992 (FN)

Sochor Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the crime apart from the norm of capital felonies the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim ..... factor as defined in dixon to apply only to a conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim ..... had construed the heinousness factor to apply only to the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 2005 (FN)

Bell Vs. Cone

Court: US Supreme Court

..... approved in proffitt 428 u s at 255 that the aggravator was directed at the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim dicks supra at 132 see ..... victim already rendered unconscious demonstrated depravity of mind in that it was cold blooded intentional conscienceless and pitiless state v dicks 615 s w 2d 126 132 tenn 1981 affirming the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 01 1987 (HC)

Parkash Singh Badal and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1987P& H263

..... form judgment and no liberty to think for themselves but they must become soulless and conscienceless entities who would be driven by their political party in whichever direction the party chooses ..... form judgment and no liberty to think for themselves but they must become soulless and conscienceless entities who would be driven by their political party in whichever direction the party chooses .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 1976 (FN)

Gregg Vs. Georgia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... court of florida has ruled that the phrase especially heinous atrocious or cruel means a conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim state v dixon 283 so .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 1976 (FN)

Proffitt Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... consequence the court has indicated that the eighth statutory provision is directed only at the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily torturous to the victim state v dixon 283 so .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 09 1980 (SC)

Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; [1983]1SCR145a

..... consequence the court has indicated that the eighth statutory provision is directed only at the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily tortuous to the victim 207 it appears to us .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 04 1979 (SC)

Bachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;

..... consequence the court has indicated that the eighth statutory provision is directed only at the conscienceless or pitiless crime which is unnecessarily tortuous to the victim 207 it appears to us .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //