Skip to content


Conjunctive - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: conjunctive Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 156 results (0.006 seconds)
May 29 2000 (HC)

Krishnamurthy Vs. State by Ashok Nagar Police, Bangalore

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: May-29-2000

Reported in: ILR2000KAR3844; 2000(6)KarLJ243

of face neck and front of chest face was discoloured conjunctivae congested considering these symptoms on enquiry by the investigating officer

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 03 2000 (SC)

P. Mohan Babu Vs. D. Ramaswamy and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-03-2000

Reported in: [2001]107CompCas399(SC); 2000CriLJ4671; JT2000(7)SC434; (2000)9SCC528

..... both the conditions precedent for exercising the jurisdiction under section 263 of the act are conjunctive and not disjunctive an order of assessment passed by an income tax officer therefore should .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 2000 (SC)

K. M. Abdul Razzak Vs. Damodharan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-02-2000

Reported in: AIR2000SC2192; JT2000(6)SC222; (2001)1MLJ37(SC); 2000(4)SCALE388; (2000)5SCC369

..... conditions constitute the essence of the legislative scheme the expression necessary or expedient read in conjunction with the public purpose implied in the section does canalise the exercise of the power .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 18 2000 (SC)

Balwant Kaur and anr. Vs. Chanan Singh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-18-2000

Reported in: 2000(3)CTC444; JT2000(5)SC102; (2000)3MLJ59(SC); (2000)126PLR469; 2000(3)SCALE332; (2000)6SCC310; 2000(2)LC1290(SC); AIR2000SC1908

..... r 698 approved an acceptable formula of co relating the notion of real income in conjunction with the method of accounting for the purpose of computation of income for the purpose .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 11 2000 (HC)

M/s. Padmini Products, Bangalore Vs. the Regional Director, Employees' ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-11-2000

Reported in: [2000(86)FLR414]; ILR2000KAR2370; 2000(2)KarLJ369; (2000)IILLJ58Kant

..... other proceeding for relief under sub section 2 has to be read disjunctively and not conjunctively otherwise it leads to absurdity when the legislature has consciously used the aforesaid two different .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2000 (HC)

The Management of Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Mysore D ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-08-2000

Reported in: 2001(2)KarLJ453; (2001)IILLJ1181Kant

..... other proceeding for relief under sub section 2 has to be read disjunctively and not conjunctively otherwise it leads to absurdity when the legislature has consciously used the aforesaid two different .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 04 2000 (TRI)

Hutchison Max Telecom Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-04-2000

Reported in: (2001)(132)ELT774Tri(Mum.)bai

..... machine performing a specific function other than data processing and incorporating or working in conjunction with an automatic data processing machine the asstt commissioner whose order has been ..... machines performing a specific function other than data processing that incorporate or work in conjunction with data processing machines of heading will fall for classification under that heading .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 2000 (HC)

Gopal Singh Vs. Indian Railway Const. Company Ltd.(ircon)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-10-2000

Reported in: (2000)IILLJ845Del

..... and compensation as admissible to them under section 25f read in conjunction with sub section 2 of section 25fff of the industrial disputes ..... compensation as admissible to them under section 25 f read in conjunction with sub section 2 of section 25 fff of the ..... and compensation as admissible to them under section 25f read in conjunction with sub section 2 of section 25fff of the industrial disputes .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 08 2000 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Automats (India)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-08-2000

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC208

..... clauses should be read as and according to learned jdr only a conjunctive reading of the two clauses would promote the purpose of the ..... division bench of the court held thus the word and is normally conjunctive and the word or is normally disjunctive but sometimes they are ..... jdr s argument that clauses a and b should be read conjunctively in our view the context underlying the first proviso to para .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 25 2000 (HC)

Shveta Rangray and Others Vs. Thapar Institute of Engineering and Tech ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-25-2000

Reported in: AIR2001P& H13

..... and has been used which is intended lo have been used conjunctively in other words both these conditions will have to be satisfied ..... leave the institute the word and has thus to be read conjunctively a similar view has been taken by division bench of ..... conditions enumerated in clause i of regulalion 17 to be satisfied conjunctively 9 learned counsel for the institute however relied upon the judgment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //