Conjunctive - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: conjunctive Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 114 results (0.008 seconds)Ram Singh Vs. State (Delhi Admn.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-1995
Reported in: 1995CriLJ3838
having haematoma around the right eye and was having bub conjunctiva haemorrhage all these injuries on three persons were caused by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmita Kaushish and ors. Vs. Sanjay Kaushish and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-16-1995
Reported in: JT1995(8)SC507; 1995(6)SCALE617; (1996)7SCC19; [1995]Supp5SCR442
..... such a marriage is irregular fasid and not void batil therefore the bar of unlawful conjunction jama bainal mahramain renders a marriage irregular and not void consequently under the hanafi law .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSant Ram and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-21-1995
Reported in: 1995(7)SCALE137; (1996)7SCC210; [1995]Supp5SCR540
..... 32 demonstrates that the legislature intended the said clauses to be read disjunctively and not conjunctively clause a of section 32 specifies that a document can be presented for registration by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGurnam Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-19-1995
Reported in: 1995(4)Crimes260(SC); JT1995(8)SC235; 1995(6)SCALE70; 1995Supp(3)SCC743
..... such a marriage is irregular fasid and not void batil therefore the bar of unlawful conjunction jama bainal mahramain renders a marriage irregular and not void consequently under the hanafi law .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPreeti Singh Vs. Sandeep Singh and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-25-1995
Reported in: AIR1995SC1851; I(1997)DMC104SC; 1995(3)SCALE165; [1995]3SCR743; 1995(2)LC270(SC)
..... conditions constitute the essence of the legislative scheme the expression necessary or expedient read in conjunction with the public purpose implied in the section does canalise the exercise of the power .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCheenothingal Valli Vs. Cheenothingal Velayudhan and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-28-1995
Reported in: AIR1995SC1471; JT1997(10)SC529; 1995(2)SCALE667; (1995)3SCC582; 1995(2)LC68(SC)
..... r 698 approved an acceptable formula of co relating the notion of real income in conjunction with the method of accounting for the purpose of computation of income for the purpose .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShankar Hanamant Karaning Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-31-1995
Reported in: 1996CriLJ2332; ILR1996KAR458; 1995(5)KarLJ408
..... other proceeding for relief under sub section 2 has to be read disjunctively and not conjunctively otherwise it leads to absurdity when the legislature has consciously used the aforesaid two different .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGyan Chand Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-04-1995
Reported in: JT1995(9)SC222; 1995(7)SCALE302; (1996)7SCC184; [1995]Supp6SCR161
..... such a marriage is irregular fasid and not void batil therefore the bar of unlawful conjunction jama bainal mahramain renders a marriage irregular and not void consequently under the hanafi law .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaxami Narayan Rice Mills and anr. Vs. the State Bank of India, Deogha ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Feb-10-1995
..... firm they may file the suit in their individual names either in conjunction with the firm or without the firm as one of the partners ..... sue or are sued in their individual names as partners either in conjunction with or without the firm aid oforder xxx c p c is ..... or against two or more persons in their individual names as partners in conjunction with the firm or without the firm and any of them dies .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrij Mohan and 20 ors. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-20-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)WLC321; 1995(1)WLN451
..... considering the question whether words arms and ammunition should be read conjunctively for the purpose of section 5 of the tada act have ..... the words arms and ammunition in section 5 should be read conjunctively we do not think so 30 in a recent decision of ..... where it may be debatable whether the direct accusation made in conjunction with the attendant circumstances if proved to be true is likely .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial