Conjoin - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: conjoin Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 3,261 results (0.057 seconds)Ms. Jayalakshmi Jaitly Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2002
Reported in: 99(2002)DLT448; 2002(64)DRJ1
manmohan sarin j 1 petitioner ms jayalakshmi jaitly has filed this writ petition seeking quashing of the orders dated 14...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJyoti Motors Vs. Industrial Credit and Development Syndicate Ltd.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-15-2002
Reported in: (2002)4GLR3554
..... of law 3 c the learned counsel for the respondent therefore submitted that on a conjoined reading of section 34 3 section 35 and section 36 of the act once the ..... therefore the contention of the learned counsel for the respondent requires to be accepted on conjoined reading of sections 34 3 35 and 36 of the act where the legislature has .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTColumbus Vs. Ours Garage and Wrecker Service, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-20-2002
..... and localities to enact or enforce a law regulation or other provision emphasis added those conjoined words travel together if as ours garage and trao argue the safety exception of 14501 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Nemai Saha Vs. Acct. Sealdah Charge and ors.
Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal
Decided on: Aug-23-2002
Reported in: (2006)146STC336Tribunal
..... to be dismissed 3 the petitioner used affidavit in reply wherein petitioner contends that a conjoined reading of section 5 2 and section 6b 2 of the act of 1941 makes .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRupa Ashok Hurra Vs. Ashok Hurra and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-10-2002
Reported in: AIR2002SC177; (2002)2CompLJ193(SC); (2002)IIIGLR2138; (2002)3GLR290; JT2002(3)SC609; 2002(3)SCALE406; (2002)4SCC388; [2002]2SCR1006
..... in jones v secretary of state forsocial services hudson v secretary of state for socialservices conjoined appeals 1972 1 all e r 145 whoobserved the old view was that any departure .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.M. Kandasamy Vs. Corporation of Madras, Represented by Its Commissio ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-17-2002
Reported in: AIR2002Mad318; (2002)1MLJ599
..... of the m c m c act and permission obtained from the commissioner thereof a conjoined reading of sections 234 235 236 and 365 of m c m c act and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Karnataka and ors. Vs. G. Halappa and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-26-2002
Reported in: [2002(94)FLR159]; JT2002(4)SC392; (2002)4SCC662; [2002]3SCR500
rajendra babu j 1 leave granted in slp c nos 6456 6606 2000 2 the state of karnataka appointed stipendiary...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMauria Udyog Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-16-2002
Reported in: 2003(85)ECC249; 2002(146)ELT37(SC); JT2002(8)SC355; 2003(9)SCALE44; (2003)9SCC139
order1 leave granted 2 a show cause notice that was issued to the appellant resulted in confirmation of the demand...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUbedulla Vs. Smt. T. Nanmunnisa
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-20-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2751; II(2002)DMC8; ILR2002KAR1989; 2002(3)KarLJ438
orderh n narayan j 1 the short question which needs consideration in this revision is whether a proceeding initiated under...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVeerabhadrappa and anr. Vs. Jagadishgouda and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-17-2002
Reported in: ILR2003KAR3042; 2002(5)KarLJ55
r v raveendran j 1 appellants herein were respondents 5 and 6 in jagadishgouda and anr v vyavasaya seva sahakari...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial