Conjoin - Judgment Search Results

Mrs. Chidambara Vadivoo Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... abet has been used too loosely by the authority who framed the charges but a conjoined reading of both the charges clearly shows that the applicant has been hand in glove .....

Smt. Asha Arun Gawli Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1999(5)BomCR828; 1999CriLJ333

..... grounds of detention and the detention order or whether some infirmities had crept in a conjoined reading of the detention order and the grounds of detention is therefore necessary executive can .....

Mahaveer Associates Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [2001]122STC466(Kar)

..... law it is for this service rendered by the department to carry on the trade conjoining to the statute that the authorities are demanding fee required for registration thus reasonable service .....

Krishna Kumar Sharma and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1998(4)AWC54

..... that the chimney through the chamber is connected to a large number of channels again conjoined with different parts of the kiln and by controlling the opening of the channels the .....

Munda @ Satya NaraIn Choube and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(1)MPLJ478

..... other conjointly means to act in joint manner together unitedly by more than one person conjoin means join together as per the oxford large print dictionary according to corpus juris secundum .....

Ntc (ida) Emp. Association Vs. U.O.i. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1998SC2585; [1998(79)FLR156]; JT1998(2)SC665; 1998(1)SCALE302; 1998(1)LC703(SC); (1998)2UPLBEC1132

..... memorandum dated 19 7 1995 which is annexed at page 36 of the slp a conjoined reading of this o m shows that their claim for such hike in pay scale .....

Bousley Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s 298 327 328 1995 no criminal law system can function without rules of procedure conjoined with a rule of finality evidence not intro 630 duced or objections not made at .....

Mr. Gajjan Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998VAD(SC)157; AIR1998SC2417; 1998(3)BLJR1914; 1998CriLJ3609; 1998(3)Crimes34(SC); JT1998(4)SC520; 1998(4)SCALE50; (1999)1SCC233

ordernanavati j 1 both the appellants were convicted for the offences punishable under section 452 and section 302 read with...

Texmaco Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of A.P. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2005(1)JCR31(SC)]; (2000)1SCC763; [2000]118STC290(SC)

order1 in the case of indian cement v state of a p 1988 2scr574 concessions were given to manufacturers of...

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. Raghunath Balmiki and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(6)SC268; 1998(5)SCALE190; (1999)1SCC177; (1998)3UPLBEC2206

order1 civil appeal no 1249 93 was filed by the bharat coking coal limited for short bccl against an award...