Concurring - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: concurring Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 1,111 results (0.02 seconds)Adarand Constructors, Inc. Vs. Peandntilde;a
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-12-1995
..... the discriminatory effects it is designed to eliminate fullilove supra at 513 powell j concurring moreover unresolved questions remain concerning the details of the complex regulatory regimes implicated ..... j with whom breyer j joins dissenting jenkins ante at 112 o connor j concurring noting the critical difference between unconstitutional discrimination and narrowly tailored remedial programs that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCapitol Square Review and Advisory Bd. Vs. Pinette
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-1995
..... jurisprudence is complex enough without the addition of this highly litigable feature 770 thomas j concurring religious expression cannot violate the establishment clause where it 1 is purely private and ..... circumstances and context of a particular challenged practice lynch supra at 694 o connor j concurring every government practice must be judged in its unique circumstances to determine whether it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMissouri Vs. Jenkins
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-12-1995
..... the suburban school districts and denied interdistrict relief id at 76 kennedy j concurring in part and concurring in judgment t here was no interdistrict constitutional violation that would support ..... appropriate in this case however no such interdistrict violation was shown id at 755 concurring opinion citations omitted justice stewart concluded that the court 94 properly rejected the district .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRosenberger Vs. Rector and Visitors of Univ. of VA.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-01-1995
..... proportional refunds the student activities fund then represents not government resources 852 thomas j concurring whether derived from tax revenue sales of assets or otherwise but a fund ..... directive in appropriating the undesignated tax revenues nothing in the bill 854 thomas j concurring james madison s memorial and remonstrance against religious assessments hereinafter madison s remonstrance must .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSeminole Tribe of FlA. Vs. Florida
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-11-1995
..... avail itself of the nonconstitutional but ancient doctrine of sovereign immunity id at 457 opinion concurring in judgment in confronting the question whether a federal grant of jurisdiction is within the ..... article iii itself incorporated a constitutional immunity doctrine how else to explain justice harlan s concurring opinion in hans which stated practically in the same breath that a suit directly .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBmw of North America, Inc. Vs. Gore
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-11-1995
..... justice breyer with whom justice o connor and justice souter join concurring the alabama state courts have assessed the defendant 2 million in ..... v new york 336 u s 106 112 1949 jackson j concurring t here is no more effective practical guaranty against arbitrary and ..... assertion of constitutional injury see txo supra at 471 scalia j concurring in judgment and the same would be true for determinations of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMorse Vs. Republican Party of VA.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-02-1995
..... the nominating petition is the functional equivalent of the political primary id at 592 opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part delegate qualifications are in fact more closely tied ..... there are several respects in which both justice stevens opinion and justice breyer s opinion concurring in the judgment constitute remarkable departures from the settled course of our first amendment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Lopez
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-26-1995
..... a particular activity substantially affects interstate commerce does not necessarily make it so rehnquist j concurring in judgment heart of atlanta motel 379 u s at 273 w hether particular operations ..... affects interstate commerce does not necessarily make it so hodel supra at 311 rehnquist j concurring in judgment and i also recognize that congress did not write specific interstate commerce findings .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPlaut Vs. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-18-1995
..... congress also sometimes passes private legislation see chadha supra at 966 n 9 powell j concurring in judgment when congress grants particular individuals relief or benefits under its spending power the ..... remedy for plaintiffs who appealed dismissals after lampf see ante at 243 244 breyer j concurring in judgment the coverage of 27a is coextensive with the retroactive application of the general .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBennis Vs. Michigan
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-29-1995
..... the supreme court of michigan is therefore affirmed justice thomas concurring i join the opinion of the court mrs bennis points ..... government the primary responsibility for avoiding that result justice ginsburg concurring i join the opinion of the court and highlight features ..... however and it does not appear in the majority or concurring opinions according to the stipulated facts of the case the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial