Conciliation - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: conciliation Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 377 results (0.149 seconds)Gujarat Mazdoor Panchayat Vs. Conciliation Officer
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Nov-01-2001
Reported in: [2002(92)FLR728]
..... and bad in the eye of law it has been also stated that the conciliation officer after conciliation has sent a failure report to respondent no 1 had sent failure report to ..... gujarat mazdoor panchayat petitioner has filed this petition challenging the action of respondent no 1 conciliation officer respondent no 2 deputy labour commissioner and respondent no 3 labour commissioner gujarat state .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat Mazdoor Panchayat Vs. Conciliation Officer and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Nov-01-2001
Reported in: (2002)IILLJ70Guj
..... and bad in the eye of law it has been also stated that the conciliation officer after conciliation has sent a failure report to respondent no 1 had sent failure report to ..... gujarat mazdoor panchayat petitioner has filed this petition challenging the action of respondent no 1 conciliation officer respondent no 2 deputy labour commissioner and respondent no 3 labour commissioner gujarat state .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinsafi Kamdar Mandal Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Labour and Conciliation ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-09-2001
Reported in: (2002)1GLR740
..... hereinabove the petitioner trade union appears to have moved the assistant labour commissioner and conciliation officer for reference of the individual industrial disputes of the workmen concerned citing the ..... aforesaid order of this court the petitioner represented before the conciliation officer that although the court had granted liberty to challenge the settlement it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Khairunnisha Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Azamgarh and A ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-25-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)AWC1863
s k singh j 1 by means of this writ petition the petitioner has sought the quashing of the judgment...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishna Sao Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Nov-26-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)BLJR155
and have persue a the record 7 there is no dispute before me that the special officer incharge rationing patna is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajgrih Choubey Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jul-06-2001
radha mohan prasad j 1 in this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the validity of the order of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCircuit City Stores, Inc. Vs. Adams
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-21-2001
..... and gatliff coal co v cox 142 f 2d 876 882 ca6 1944 t he arbitration act excluded employment contracts see also craft v campbell soup co 177 f 3d 1083 ..... 301 of the labor management relations act 1947 lmra a federal court may enforce the arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement the union argued that such authority was implicitly granted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC and L Enterprises, Inc. Vs. Citizen Band Potawatomi Tribe of OklA.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-30-2001
..... co v sycuan band of mission indians 884 f 2d 416 ca9 1989 clause requiring arbitration of contractual disputes did not expressly waive tribe s immu 418 nity we granted certiorari ..... then addressed whether the tribe had waived its immunity the agreement of the tribe to arbitration and the contract language regarding enforcement in courts having jurisdiction the court observed seem to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.C. Goenka Vs. Chase Trading Co. and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-08-2001
Reported in: 2002(3)BomCR201; 2002(1)MhLj774
..... of the limitation act 1963 or any other law relating to limitation shall apply to arbitration under these bye laws as they apply to the proceedings in the court there is ..... contracts have been entered into or not shall also be submitted to and decided by arbitration as provided in the rules bye laws and regulations of the exchange in other words .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohanlal Dungarmal Futnani Vs. Vishanji Dungarmal Futnani and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-15-2001
Reported in: AIR2001Cal122,(2001)3CALLT218(HC)
..... their lordships decision may be apposite dr ghosh further pointed out that the time for arbitration expired on 31st december 1970 and the award was made by the arbitrator 27 days ..... in our view erroneous finding d 55 from the minutes of the meeting of the arbitration dated 29 9 1983 it appears that both the parties mutually agreed that the time .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial