Conceiver - Judgment Search Results

Kimble Vs. Mcduffy, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

kimble v mcduffy inc 454 u s 1110 1981 u s supreme court kimble v mcduffy inc 454 u s...

United States Vs. Turkette

Court: US Supreme Court

united states v turkette 452 u s 576 1981 u s supreme court united states v turkette 452 u s...

Dr. Dattatraya Narayan Samant and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1982(1)BomCR1; (1981)83BOMLR553; 1982CriLJ1025

order1 the petitioners have filed this petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure as also under article...

Ram Chander Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1036; 1981CriLJ609; 1981(1)SCALE428; (1981)3SCC191; [1981]3SCR12

1 what is the true role of a judge trying a criminal case is he to assume the role of...

Dusasan Bhoi and ors. Vs. the State of Orissa

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 52(1981)CLT126; 1981CriLJ1452

..... as a reward to the accused of forest offence such a concept is totally not conceivable from any provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 ..... as a reward to the accused of forest offence such a concept is totally not conceivable from any provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 .....

Damodar Majhi Vs. State

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 52(1981)CLT192; 1981CriLJ1450

..... as a reward to the accused of forest offence such a concept is totally not conceivable from any provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 ..... as a reward to the accused of forest offence such a concept is totally not conceivable from any provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 .....

Harihar Samal Vs. the State of Orissa

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 1982CriLJ1156

..... as a reward to the accused of forest offence such a concept is totally not conceivable from any provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 ..... as a reward to the accused of forest offence such a concept is totally not conceivable from any provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 .....

Republic of India Vs. Khagendranath Jha

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 52(1981)CLT197; 1982CriLJ961

..... as a reward to the accused of forest offence such a concept is totally not conceivable from any provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 ..... as a reward to the accused of forest offence such a concept is totally not conceivable from any provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 .....

Jadunath Khatua Vs. the State

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 1982CriLJ954

..... as a reward to the accused of forest offence such a concept is totally not conceivable from any provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 ..... as a reward to the accused of forest offence such a concept is totally not conceivable from any provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 .....

Nityananda Samal Vs. Naraprasad

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 53(1982)CLT71; 1982CriLJ927

..... as a reward to the accused of forest offence such a concept is totally not conceivable from any provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 ..... as a reward to the accused of forest offence such a concept is totally not conceivable from any provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 .....