Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.346 seconds)Rajinder Ghai Vs. the Chandigarh Housing Board
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-31-2000
Reported in : (2000)126PLR438
avoid any possibility of the litigation keeping in view the general policy the name of the petitioner was to be included state has no dominus status to dictate unilateral terms and conditions when it enters into contract its actions must be reasonable respondent board in november 1979 and he is continuing in service the board for the first time in the month of unilateral terms and conditions when it enters into contract its actions must be reasonable fair and just in consonance with rule a statutory body created under the haryana housing board act 1971 as extended to the union territory of chandigarh by central
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDula Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jun-01-2000
Reported in : (2000)126PLR609
and his trial by security force court inexpedient the director general may inform the person concerned accordingly 2 the director general after availing of said leave he did not resume his duties as a result court of enquiry was ordered under the of dismissal was passed by the commandant in exercise of powers under section 11 of the act on the basis of state has no dominus status to dictate unilateral terms and conditions when it enters into contract its actions must be reasonable to the conclusion that further retention of the plaintiff in service was undesirable in answer to this submission learned counsel appearing of the charges upon which it is proposed to take action against him in regard to dismissal or removal from service 1968 and as head constable with effect from 13 8 1971 plaintiff asked for five days casual leave from 17 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjitinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Others
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-17-2000
Reported in : 2000CriLJ1827
also no dispute that the 5th respondent also contested the general election but got defeated judgment order decree passed by a single judge in exercising powers of superintendence under article 227 of the constitution if a no person shall except in such cases and under such conditions as may be prescribed by the central government use or provisions of the emblems and names prevention of improper use act 1950 and the prevention of insults to national honour act provisions of the prevention of insults to national honour act 1971 section 2 of the said act provides as under whoever
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTi.J. Gandhi Vs. the Estate Officer and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-31-2000
Reported in : (2000)125PLR756
trade semi industrial trade or special trade 3 the expression general trade semi industrial trade and special trade shall mean one state cooperative bank limited the assistant estate officer exercising the powers of the estate officer union territory chandigarh initiated proceedings under the conditions of sale according to the said respondent the conditions incorporated in the letter of sale were binding on the referred to as the rules section 8a of the 1952 act which contains the provision for resumption and rule 9 of site is justified the order of eviction passed under the 1971 act has been justified on the premise that it is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinternational Publishers Vs. Union Territory and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-26-2000
Reported in : AIR2000P& H260; (2000)126PLR579
carry on any trade or employ any industry other than general trade semi industrial trade or special trade 3 the expression no 2722 utfi 3 98 7018 in exercise of the powers conferred by sub rule 11 of rule 17 of the section 3 or has committed a breach of any other conditions of such sale the estate officer may by notice in in accordance with the capital of punjab development and regulation service of notice rules 1974 for short the 1974 rules and used in the opening part of section 2 of the act 15 in the light of the above it is to i of the public premises eviction of unauthorised occupants act 1971 for ejectment of the petitioner and respondent no 4 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKashmir Singh Vs. Tana S/O Haria and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-11-2000
Reported in : (2000)126PLR653
thus has no dominus status to dictate unilateral terms and conditions when it enters into contract and its actions must be of the objector petitioners it is held that warrants of actual possession could not be issued in execution of the decree the exercise of its revisional jurisdiction 20 the authority air 1971 s c 2324 supra relied upon by the learned counsel
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJan Kalyan Simiti (Regd.) and ors. Vs. Housing Board Haryana and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-03-2000
Reported in : (2003)134PLR526
founded on the principles of fairness and to meet the general requirements of the society at large such schemes cannot act and more so when the action springs from exercise of powers in furtherance to the statutory provisions laid down by hon 7 under clause 9 of the letter of allotment two conditions emerge for consideration firstly in relation to the ground that an appeal arising out of a proceeding under a special act sections 100 a as inserted by act 22 of 2002 clause g section 2 of the haryana housing board act 1971 the governor of haryana had authorised the estate managers of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSh. Gurbax Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-26-2000
Reported in : (2000)126PLR550
thus has no dominus status to dictate unilateral terms and conditions when it enters into contract and its actions must be of punjab and carried with him all the benefits of service rendered by him in the erstwhile state of pepsu 3 like on petitioner bidder to establish his allegations as state action shall always be presumed to be in accordance with law
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNaraIn Dass (Through His L.R.S.) Vs. Jai Kishan
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-20-2000
Reported in : (2000)126PLR786
property was allotted the chief settlement commissioner had also the powers under sub section 1 of section 24 of the act thus has no dominus status to dictate unilateral terms and conditions when it enters into contract and its actions must be application made by narain dass under section 33 of the act was accepted by the financial commissioner revenue punjab chandigarh as hash and ors v union of india and ors air 1971 s c 771 that section officer cum managing officer could
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDevi Dass Gopal Krishan Ltd. Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-04-2000
Reported in : 2001(75)ECC518; 2002(140)ELT56(P& H)
vide judgment dated 8 7 1985 m s dhanpat oil general mills v union of india and others air 1985 supreme petitioner read as under the 1944 act 11a recovery of duties not levied or not paid or short levied or short judgment order decree passed by a single judge in exercising powers of superintendence under article 227 of the constitution their lordships but no interest was payable because there was no such condition in the order of the supreme court thereafter the impugned the chief commissioner of central excise 9 explanation where the service of notice is stayed by an order of a court of cess on vegetable oil section 11aa of the 1944 act cannot be invoked by the respondents for charging interest on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT