Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: mumbai Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.197 seconds)Mrs. Suman Nivrutti Takale Vs. Shri Amarchand Ramchandra Patwa
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-06-2000
Reported in : 2000(3)ALLMR552; 2000(4)BomCR70; [2000(85)FLR791]
the petitioner appears to have claimed a difference in wages actually paid to her and legally payable under the minimum wages of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act 1971 section 50 recovery of money due from employer difference in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOlympus Enterprises Ltd. V.Dy. Cit
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-17-2000
Reported in : (2004)90TTJ(Mumbai)1100
assessee as to his rights it is one of their duties to assist a taxpayer in every reasonable way particularly in 1993 circular no 670 dated 26 10 1993 bombay stamp act 1958 schedule 1 article 36 y r meena cj d
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSadanand S. Varde and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jun-14-2000
Reported in : 2000(4)ALLMR510; 2001(1)BomCR261; [2001]247ITR609(Bom)
filed by the sixth and the ninth respondents through their auditors k k ramani and co on june 2 1994 and planning act were not followed and b that the second general body resolution passed by the bombay municipal corporation was bad public whose interest is projected as affected despite the awesome powers available in writ jurisdiction the courts have constructively bridled this user of the land was subject to several restrictions and conditions which were indicated in the order 9 the order of pvt ltd v union of india air1988sc1708 was pressed into service to contend that a bank constituted under the banking companies appeal under section 47 of the maharashtra regional town planning act against refusal of the development permission on october 8 1982 the planning authority under the maharashtra regional town planning act 1971 the first respondent instructed the second respondent to take suitable
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMarathwada Krishi Vidyapith Magasvargiya Sevak Kalyankari Sangh Vs. St ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : May-05-2000
Reported in : 2000(4)ALLMR183; (2000)IIILLJ869Bom
the scheme for conducting their entrance examinations declaration of results general instructions and method of admission etc this brochure is binding the petitioner has contended that the qualification nature of work duties and responsibilities of the work of labourers who are daily would be better that the state government should exercise its power under section 10 or section 10 a of the industrial statutory provisions rules and other instructions if any governing the conditions of service the main concern of the court in such employment standing orders act 1946 therefore the terminations of their services without following the provisions of section 25 f and 25 the rule of law and to see that the executive acts fairly and gives a fair deal to its employees consistent of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act 1971 mrtu and pulp act there the allegations was that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaharashtra General Kamgar Union and ors. Vs. Empire Industries Ltd. a ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-15-2000
Reported in : [2000(86)FLR189]; (2000)IIILLJ1036Bom
after considering the judgment in shramik utkarsha sabha supra maharashtra general kamgar union supra and the judgments of other learned single clause 3 of section 30 of c p c certain powers as vested in the courts are also conferred on the be repugnant to what has been laid down in the condition of approval granted by the central authority or council what not possible to say that under the b i r act representation by an individual is excluded those are sections which the m r t u p u l p act 1971 as also some other reliefs this complaint is based on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Workmen Employed in the Refinery ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Oct-06-2000
Reported in : 2001(2)ALLMR48; 2001(2)BomCR224; (2001)2BOMLR221; [2001(88)FLR1]; (2002)IVLLJ354Bom
by them shri cama maintains that they have honoured the general promises while the union has backed out by raising the by the management from the workmen who wanted to join duties i shri reference no of department wish to resumework with of the industrial disputes act the legislature has given ample powers to the government to act in every such situation the of the employer and also wage levels and other service conditions of the employees if the right to work is to be in the employment of the public sector enjoying good service conditions including good wages and who are assured of job the first thing which could be done was to take action under section 10 to refer the industrial dispute between the the m r t u p u l p act 1971 before the industrial court for the same demands and that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.R.C. Employees Union Vs. N.R.C. Ltd.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-09-2000
Reported in : [2000(86)FLR482]; (2000)IIILLJ777Bom
the purpose of effecting changes in shift timings and the general shift working in some departments this was resisted by the the case of the complainant in the matter of their conditions of service i am afraid it will not be possible is contended is also a part of the conditions of service prevailing at the factory and consequently the petitioner union can 5 and 9 of schedule iv of the mrtu pulp act 1971 the grievance of the complainant was that the respondent and 9 of schedule iv of the mrtu pulp act 1971 the grievance of the complainant was that the respondent company
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajiv Bhalchandra Gundewar Vs. Crompton Greaves Ltd.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-24-2000
Reported in : [2000(85)FLR602]; (2000)IIILLJ774Bom
follow instructions and directions from the general manager and assistant general manager from time to time he had no power to assistant general manager from time to time he had no power to sanction leave to the employees and also no power be repugnant to what has been laid down in the condition of approval granted by the central authority or council what the complaint has prayed for declaration that by terminating his services vide termination order dated march 9 1999 the employer has copy expedited labour and industrial framing of issues industrial disputes act 1947 complaint filed by petitioner alleging that employer indulged in employer in revision undersection 44 of the mrtu pulp act 1971 the industrial court vide its order datednovember 30 1999 partly
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs. Petroleum Employees Union and ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-15-2000
Reported in : 2001(2)BomCR447; (2001)1BOMLR112; [2001(91)FLR108]; (2000)IIILLJ25Bom; 2001(1)MhLj708
gone into as in radhey shyam sharma v post master general central circle nagpur and ors the apex court was seized the workers that they can make use of their collective powers it corresponds to protection of the legitimate expectation of management to be dismissed in limine it is contended that service conditions of theemployees employed by the plaintiffs are determined and fixed contained in section 23 is confined to non public utility services the legislation clearly places great importance on the circumstances set the remedy provided for it is under the industrial disputes act and can only be enforced under section 26 of the of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act 1971 the court declined to grant an injunction before a declaration
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuryabhan S/O. Rangnath Sarowar Vs. Divisional Soil Conservation Offic ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jun-17-2000
Reported in : 2000(4)ALLMR508; 2001(2)BomCR288; [2000(86)FLR807]; (2000)IIILLJ1044Bom
the scheme for conducting their entrance examinations declaration of results general instructions and method of admission etc this brochure is binding be repugnant to what has been laid down in the condition of approval granted by the central authority or council what the m r t u and p u l p act 1971 that he was continuously employed for a period of m r t u and p u l p act 1971 that he was continuously employed for a period of twelve
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT