Comptroller And Auditor General S Duties Powers And Conditions Of Service Act 1971 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: comptroller and auditor general s duties powers and conditions of service act 1971 Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 300 results (1.193 seconds)Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Maneesh Chibber, Senior Correspondent, Hin ...
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-29-2004
Reported in : 2005CriLJ718
hon ble judge the argument raised by learned deputy advocates general that the said report has to be read between the therefore was done in a bona fide discharge of his duties as a member of the fourth estate the contemner did the hon ble supreme court regarding the exercise of the powers of contempt in relation to the fourth estate in re almost at the same time without any ostensible reason tendered conditional apology in our opinion the apology tendered by him is scandalise etc etc of any court 19 in delhi judicial service association tis hazari court delhi v state of gujarat 1991 regulated by sections 6 and 30 of the hindu succession act in haryana property in hands of successor has to be as to invite proceedings under the contempt of courts act 1971 hereinafter referred to as the act continuing his arguments learned
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHardial and ors. Vs. the Commissioner and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-05-2004
Reported in : (2004)137PLR825
lal son of amir chand who was a member of general category and at the relevant time was residing in singapore while framing laws part iv a de fines the fundamental duties of the citizens in a way that was implicit in judgment order decree passed by a single judge in exercising powers of superintendence under article 227 of the constitution article 39 not have been condemned unheard shri sharma also assailed the conditions enshrined in the memorandum of offer dated 1 2 1965 section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order decree to how harbans lal could execute will on 25 12 1971 in respect of the property which he had purchased on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaj Kaur Vs. Housing Board Haryana and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-06-2004
Reported in : (2004)137PLR668
have been vehemently contested by ms mamta singla assistant advocate general haryana 4 after hearing the learned counsel for the parties judgment order decree passed by a single judge in exercising powers of superintendence under article 227 of the constitution 1 if sale consideration of rs 45 000 as per terms and conditions of the sale a sum of rs 6750 i e shall vacate them within one month from the date of service of the notice section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order decree the petitioner section 51 of the haryana housing board act 1971 for short the act is to the following effect 51
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTO.P. Sarwal Vs. Chandigarh Housing Board
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-24-2004
Reported in : AIR2005P& H91; (2005)139PLR517
been accepted by everyone and therefore it was in the general interest of the allottees that the amount of rs 3 noticed section 30 and observed that it only deals with power of his share in coparcenary property by will which prior with interest which is in accordance with the terms and conditions of the brochure 9 mr naresh prabhakar learned counsel for regulated by sections 6 and 30 of the hindu succession act in haryana property in hands of successor has to be be subject to the provision of haryana housing board act 1971 as applicable to u t chandigarh and the chandigarh housing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Kaushalya Aggarwal Vs. Punwire Paging Services Ltd. (In Liquidati ...
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-20-2004
Reported in : [2004]121CompCas431(P& H); [2004]56SCL540(Punj& Har)
its value and would thus be against the interest of general body of the creditors including the workmen etc it was accept an order upon such terms the court shall have power to vest the estate and interest of the company in the adjudication of the claim of mrs bafna subject to conditions in appeal against the directions of the pivision bench the etc it was pointed out that m s punwire paging services ltd was maintaining 30 centres whereas m s punwire mobile considering the scope of section 535 2 of the companies act as well as rule 268 of the companies court rules proceedings under the public premises eviction of unauthorised occupants act 1971 the company court directed the official liquidator to forthwith formally
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChet Ram Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Sep-22-2004
Reported in : (2005)139PLR552
the petitioners and mr raghbir chaudhary learned senior deputy advocate general haryana with their assistance i have gone through the available no 5 the sub divisional magistrate civil fatehabad exercising the powers of prescribed authority vide order dated 26 5 1979 copy otherwise was enlarged and on date of enforcement of succession act she became a full owner likewise if she has inherited that though the petitioners were tenants earlier to 24 1 1971 yet their claim for tenant s permissible area was rightly
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.S. Bindra and anr. Vs. C.B.i.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-18-2004
Reported in : 2005CriLJ406
and petitioner no 2 d b malhotra were working as general manager and sales manager respectively in messers modern food industries they continued to be governed by the restriction on the power of alienation of a male holder as existed before enforcement control of the company for the purpose of their service conditions is still in the hands of the government it has performance of any public duty ii any person in the service or pay of a local authority iii any person in it existed under act no 2 of 1920 hindu succession act 1956 c a no 30 1956 sections 6 30 vijender
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTScheduled Castes Co-op. Society Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Oct-15-2004
Reported in : AIR2005P& H100; (2005)139PLR665
singh sub inspector co operative society lalru and called the general body meeting in which the possibilities of starting joint agriculture 8 5 1957 that rule 9 a was inserted vesting powers with the government so as to recover the instalments due society the society yet complied with all the terms and conditions of the allotment and therefore the sale certificate would date upon the treasurer or the members was not a proper service he further contends that in any case while endeavouring to been defined in section 54 of the transfer of property act 1882 it is a transfer of ownership in exchange for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrem Singh Sodhi, Accountant, Municipal Committee Vs. State of Punjab ...
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-22-2004
Reported in : (2004)137PLR612
that initial appointment of the petitioner to the post of accountant grade b was under the trust rules 3 the petitioner experienced professionals of eminence keeping in view the nature and duties of the post required to be filled the specialists to judgment order decree passed by a single judge in exercising powers of superintendence under article 227 of the constitution 18725 of 5 2 i of the punjab trust service recruitment and conditions of service rules 1978 hereinafter to be referred to as the petitioner continued to discharge his duties in the municipal service 5 by an order dated 2 8 1996 the petitioner section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order decree
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Ved Parkash Pathak Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-07-2004
Reported in : (2004)136PLR663
i r 1964 s c 506 moti ram deka v general manager north east frontier railway 5 a i r 1964 punjab civil services p a rules 1970 and all other powers enabling him in this behalf the governor of punjab is 9 of the rules for holding enquiry which constitutes a condition precedent for imposition of any of the major penalties specified the powers conferred by rule 8 of the punjab civil services p a rules 1970 and all other powers enabling him is quashed leaving the state government free to take further action in accordance with law sections 100 a as inserted by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT