Complexed - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: complexed Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 307 results (0.029 seconds)Hari Chand and ors. Vs. Faridabad Complex Administration and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-26-2005
Reported in: AIR2005SC2429; 2005(2)ESC252; [2005(105)FLR765]; JT2005(4)SC608; (2005)IILLJ1085SC; (2005)4SCC592; 2005(2)SLJ432(SC)
..... which was converted into faridabad notified area committee later on renamed as faridabad complex administration and finally as faridabad municipal corporation the particulars of their service are ..... some employees working with faridabad development board whose services were transferred to faridabad complex administration came to know about the bye laws formulated by the administration regarding .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAir Vice Marshal J.S. Kumar (Retd.) Vs. Governing Council of Air Force ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2005
Reported in: 123(2003)DLT409
..... on 08 sep 01 the governing council of air force sports complex after deliberation invoked provisions of rule 8 of the rules and ..... bye laws of the air force sports complex and decided to terminate your membership due to your alleged involvement ..... other serving air force officers utilizing facilities of the said sports complex mr tiku s submission is that if the preferred view is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAatithya Motels and Complex (P) Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Rajkot
Decided on: Nov-25-2005
Reported in: (2005)98TTJ(Rajkot.)825
..... truth shri shailesh mehta is a builder and he has developed many complexes in jamnagar in fact he is doing this work since 1980 ..... very statement mr mehta had admitted that plot at the panorama complex was purchased for total consideration of rs 40 lakhs and the ..... in answer to question no 7 submitted that the land at panorama complex was actually purchased for rs 61 lakhs and his earlier statement .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kakkar Complex Steels P. Ltd.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-10-2005
Reported in: [2005]277ITR361(P& H)
..... 2 of the act in i t c no 45 of 1984 cit v kakkar complex steels p ltd decided on august 25 1988 it has not been shown that the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSenior Citizen Home Complex Welfare Society Vs. Sushila Ambika
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2005
j d kapoor president 1 appellant is a senior citizen home complex welfare society it offered built up flats to senior citizens at dehradun which was to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce Vs. Keltron Component Complex Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jan-27-2005
1 revenue has filed this appeal against the oia no 68 to 70 03 ce passed by commissioner appeals cochin...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Steel Complex Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Apr-01-2005
Reported in: (2005)(188)ELT418Tri(Bang.)
1 this revenue appeal arises from oia no 91 2002 c e dated 22 7 2002 the findings recorded by...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Didar Steel Complex (P) Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-10-2005
Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT39TriDel
1 in this appeal the revenue has disputed the correctness of the impugned order none has come present for the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTitawi Sugar Complex Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-07-2005
Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT119TriDel
1 modvat credit has been disallowed to the appellants on 1 electrodes 2 asbestos packing 3 p m shaft and...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of C. Excise Vs. Steel Complex Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Oct-24-2005
Reported in: (2006)(106)ECC211
1 this is revenue s appeal against the order in appeal no 8 2003 dated 30 1 2003 passed by...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial