Complexed - Judgment Search Results

Delta Paper Mills Limited , Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Commission and ors ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1991]81STC339(AP)

..... division the petitioner is w p no 5533 of 1990 is the costal agro industrial complex p ltd tanuku which manufactures rice bran straw board waste paper bagasse etc in w .....

Faridabad Complex Administration Vs. Hindustan Milkfood Manufacturers ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC355; 1991Supp(2)SCC262

..... and also for the period involved cannot be raised by the appellant i e faridabad complex administration the appeal is therefore dismissed with no order as to costs the order of .....

Broadway Complex Vs. Administrator, Corporation of the City of Bangalo ...

Court: Karnataka

..... committee subject no tac 233 80 81 m s chidambaram bros no 19 3 broadway complex kempegowda road bangalore 9 heard the counsel for the appellant his main contention is that .....

Broadway Complex Vs. Administrator, Corporation of the City of Bangalo ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1991]188ITR358(KAR); [1991]188ITR358(Karn); 1990(2)KarLJ139

..... committee subject no tac 233 80 81 messrs chidambaram and bros no 19 3 broadway complex kempegowda road bangalore 9 heard counsel for the appellant his main contention is that as .....

Semi Conductor Complex Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1990)LC101Tri(Delhi)

1 1 the appellants had imported an ion implanter machine for which a service and spares contract had been executed...

Hotel Broadway Complex Vs. Administrator, Corporation of the City of B ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1990KAR629; [1990]183ITR569(KAR); [1990]183ITR569(Karn); 1990(1)KarLJ252

s r rajashekara murthy j 1 in these writ petitions the special notice issued under rule 9 schedule iii of...

Besant Nagar Residents Vs. Madras Metropolitan Development Authority a ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1990)1MLJ445

..... kalakshetra colony welfare association that no plan approval had been cleared for the proposed office complex by the fourth respondent subsequently it seems on the representations made by the petitioner ..... affidavit that the proposal of the fourth respondent herein for construction of an office complex could only imply lesser congestion and lesser pressure on infrastructure than the central public .....

Food Corporation of India Workers' Union Vs. Food Corporation of India ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC2178; JT1990(3)SC323; 1990LabIC1910; 1990(2)SCALE65; 1990Supp(1)SCC296; 1990(2)LC414(SC); (1990)2UPLBEC971

..... departmentalised labour employed in the respondent corporation are having three different pay scales viz calcutta complex depots east zone depots and depots in delhi and u p as regards the ..... allow the departmentalised workers of east zone the subsequent wage revisions allowed to the calcutta complex workers the case of the respondent corporation is further that the departmental workers working .....

Kansas Vs. Utilicorp United

Court: US Supreme Court

..... respondent to recover only damages for its lost sales in a single lawsuit the additional complexity thereby introduced into a case that already has become quite complicated argues strongly for ..... ways could be found to bring all potential plaintiffs together in one huge action the complexity thereby introduced into treble damages proceedings argues strongly for retaining the hanover shoe rule 431 .....

Eskay Fine Chemicals Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1991)LC780Tri(Mum.)bai

..... point at issue before the tribunal in the said matter was import of tetracycline urea complex and the tribunal ultimately held that what was imported was tetracycline adding innocuous substance urea ..... the decision referred to above pertain to the item at issue there namely tetracycline urea complex and cannot be mutatis mutandis made applicable here further here the question of active ingredient .....