Competitive - Judgment Search Results

Forest Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT570Tri(Chennai)

1 this appeal is against the order of the additional collector of central excise belgaum under the impugned order the...

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. N.B. Ataulla Khan

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1995(2)ALT757; [1996]217ITR17(AP)

..... not claimed exemption under section 5 1a at time of assessment whether appeal preferred after competition of such assessment maintainable wto bound to ascertain not only assets of assessee but exemptions .....

United States Vs. Lopez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rev ed 1979 638 appendix to opinion of breyer j council on competitiveness competitiveness index 5 july 1994 council on competitiveness elevating the skills of the american workforce may 1993 council on ..... in the united states developing the human resources we need for technological advance and competitiveness in 2 working papers of the mit commission on industrial productivity 1989 mit mitchell .....

Qualitex Co. Vs. Jacobson Products Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... aesthetic functionality it explains is whether the recognition of trademark rights would significantly hinder competition id at 176 the upshot is that where a color serves a significant ..... mark would permit one competitor or a group to interfere with legitimate nontrademark related competition through actual or potential exclusive use of an important product ingredient that examination should .....

State of Assam and ors. Vs. Rajeev Dey and ors., Etc. Etc.

Court: Guwahati

..... general seats along with other general candidates in the open competition but priyakshi barman and pronosmita kalita who have marks less ..... available seats seats to be filled up through all india competitive examination and the aforesaid definition of available seats in rule ..... seats which were to be filled up through all india competitive examination or allotted to north eastern states or reserved for .....

RubIn Vs. Coors Brewing Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of factual information in the wine and spirits markets the government seeks to control competition on the basis of strength by monitoring distillers promotions and marketing respondent quite correctly ..... find no merit whatsoever in the government s assertion that an interest in restraining competition among brewers to satisfy consumer demand for stronger beverages justifies a statutory abridgment of .....

Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. Vs. Umbehr

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and other forms 692 of public corruption all 50 states have enacted legislation imposing competitive bidding requirements on various types of contracts with the government 1 government contract 1 ..... state and local regulation i described earlier takes account of this reality even where competitive bidding requirements are applicable which is far from always they almost invariably require that .....

American Airlines, Inc. Vs. Wolens

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to prohibit advertisements which in its opinion do not further competitive pricing id at 390 391 morales also left room for ..... could hardly have intended to allow the states to hobble competition for airline passengers through the application of restrictive state laws ..... to investigate unfair and deceptive practices and unfair methods of competition by airlines and may order an airline to cease and .....

National Federation of S.B.i. and Others, Etc. Vs. Union of India and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC1457; JT1995(3)SC336; (1996)ILLJ435SC; 1995(2)SCALE282; (1995)3SCC532; [1995]2SCR748; 1995(3)SLJ107(SC); 1995(2)LC157(SC); (1995)2UPLBEC909

..... enclosure contains several other matters under sub headings 9aa promotions through limited departmental competitive examination 9b promotions by selection from group c to group b within group ..... filling such reserved vacancies are given in appendix 13 in promotions through departmental competitive examinations scheduled castes scheduled tribes candidates who have not acquired the general qualifying .....

State of Karnataka Vs. Kumari Gowri Narayana Ambiga Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC1691; JT1997(10)SC568; 1995LabIC2085; 1995(2)SCALE499; 1995Supp(2)SCC560; 1995(2)SLJ152(SC); 1995(2)LC1(SC)

..... procedure prescribed by the aforesaid rules of recruitment the assurance of efficiency implicit in competitive selection thus became the first casualty these irregular candidates are now sought to be ..... eligibility is quite distinct and different from suitability suitability could be considered only by competitive test with an application of the same yardstick to all candidates with a prescription .....