Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 10 Page 1 of about 216,940 results (0.688 seconds)

Google Inc. and Ors Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr

Court : Delhi

..... , 2007 conferred a power on the cci to review its order. it was his contention that the application filed by the appellants for recall was ..... right the supreme court in competition commission of india vs. steel authority of india ltd. (2010) 10 scc744has held does not exist.7. the counsel for the respondent no.1 cci, on that date, while opposing the said contention had drawn our attention to section 37 of the competition act which section prior to its repeal by the competition (amendment) act, 2007 with effect from 12th october .....

Samir Agrawal Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and 53t of the act, where the expression used is person aggrieved , but hastened to add that once an informant had moved the cci, for the purposes of filing ..... referred us to various provisions of the act, including, in particular, sections 19 and 35, arguing that the amendments made in the sections would show that any person can be an informant who can approach the cci, as one does not have to be a consumer or a complainant , which was the position before the competition (amendment) act, 2007 [ 2007 amendment ].. he contrasted these provisions with sections 53b .....

Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... bodies are created for performing two kinds of functions, one, advisory and regulatory and other adjudicatory. though the tribunal has been constituted by the competition (amendment) act, 2007, the commission continues to perform both the functions stated by 68 this court in that case. cumulative effect of the above reasoning is that the ..... india. this committee made recommendations and submitted its report on 22nd of may, 2002. after completion of the consultation process, the competition act, 2002 (for short, the `act') as act 12 of 2003, dated 12th december, 2003, was enacted. as per the statement of objects and reasons, this enactment is india ..... is the measure stating the final attitude of the commission concerning undertakings against which proceedings for infringement of the rules on competition have been commenced.; the jurisdiction of the commission, to act under this provision, does not contemplate any adjudicatory function. the commission is not expected to give notice to the .....

Coromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... of natural resources being transparent and fair method so that all eligible persons get a fair opportunity of competition. 18. before considering whether the provisions of sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of the amendment act, which are under challenge being unreasonable, arbitrary and unconstitutional, we would like to look into the law ..... was not considering the case of auction in general, but specifically evaluating the validity of those methods adopted in the distribution of spectrum from september 2007 to march 2008. it is also pertinent to note that reference to auction is made in the subsequent para 96 with the rider perhaps ?. ..... the supreme court considered several questions amongst which we are concerned with only two, first, whether the exercise undertaken by department of telecommunications (dot) from september, 2007 to march, 2008 for grant of unified access services (uas) licences to the private respondents in terms of the recommendations made by telecom regulatory authority of india .....

Tata Sky Limited Vs. Espn Software India Pvt. Ltd

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

..... market and that even though the authority itself favors forbearance as the best option. the authority has wrongly prescribed, in the name of lack of effective competition, a ceiling on the rates that can be charged by the msos and lcos from the subscribers. it was alleged that all these stipulations would cause ..... not the one envisaged under section 11 (2) of the act, under which it has issued the impugned order. we finally held as follows:- with these findings, we set aside the telecommunication (broadcasting and cable) services (second) tariff (eighth amendment) order 2007 dated 4.10.2007 of the telecom regulatory authority of india. we direct the trai ..... not been fulfilled? (c) whether instead of fixing tariffs as stipulated in the trai act, the order is only in the nature of interim order resulting in freezing of prices? (d) whether trai had wrongly concluded that adequate and effective competition in the market is lacking, despite clear evidence of substantial growth? (e) whether the .....

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... act 2008 xiv. the competition act 2002 xv. the companies act 2013 xvi. the cinematograph act 1952 xvii. the income tax act 1961 xviii. the customs act 1962 xix. the administrative tribunals act 1985 xx. the consumer protection act 1986 xxi. the securities and exchange board of india act 1992 xxii. the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act 1993 xxiii. the armed forces tribunal act 2007 ..... during the pre- independence era, the number of tribunals has now increased to several dozens. the constitution of india (42nd amendment) act, 1976 provided for setting up of administrative tribunals through article 323a as well as other tribunals under article 323b. these aforementioned ..... law, tax law, company law or environment law, etc. legislative development of tribunalisation :38. in india, the constitution (42nd amendment) act, 1976 paved way for tribunalisation of the justice dispensation system by introduction of articles 323a and 323b in the constitution. these provisions .....

Ravi Dev Gupta Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... federal communications et al.:512. us622(1994). the question before the supreme court pertained to sections 4 and 5 of the cable television consumer protection and competition act 1992. those provisions required cable television systems to devote a portion of their channels to the transmission of local broadcast television stations. the question was whether ..... balanced development of broadcasting on radio and television. one of its objectives is to provide adequate coverage on sports and games so as to encourage healthy competition and the spirit of sportsmanship. in order to realize this goal, the prasar bharati has been empowered to negotiate for purchase, or otherwise acquire programmes ..... concerned, is section 8 thereof. this has also undergone an amendment by virtue of act 21 of 2011 with retrospective effect from 25.10.2011. though the amendment has been brought about after the decision of the learned single judge in wp(c) 7655/2007, it will not alter the position insofar as the cases .....

Board of Control for Cricket in India and Another Vs. Prasar Bharati ...

Court : Delhi

..... federal communications et al.:512. us622(1994). the question before the supreme court pertained to sections 4 and 5 of the cable television consumer protection and competition act 1992. those provisions required cable television systems to devote a portion of their channels to the transmission of local broadcast television stations. the question was whether ..... balanced development of broadcasting on radio and television. one of its objectives is to provide adequate coverage on sports and games so as to encourage healthy competition and the spirit of sportsmanship. in order to realize this goal, the prasar bharati has been empowered to negotiate for purchase, or otherwise acquire programmes ..... concerned, is section 8 thereof. this has also undergone an amendment by virtue of act 21 of 2011 with retrospective effect from 25.10.2011. though the amendment has been brought about after the decision of the learned single judge in wp(c) 7655/2007, it will not alter the position insofar as the cases .....

Board of Control for Cricket in India and Another Vs. Prasar Bharati, ...

Court : Delhi

..... federal communications et al.:512. us622(1994). the question before the supreme court pertained to sections 4 and 5 of the cable television consumer protection and competition act 1992. those provisions required cable television systems to devote a portion of their channels to the transmission of local broadcast television stations. the question was whether ..... balanced development of broadcasting on radio and television. one of its objectives is to provide adequate coverage on sports and games so as to encourage healthy competition and the spirit of sportsmanship. in order to realize this goal, the prasar bharati has been empowered to negotiate for purchase, or otherwise acquire programmes ..... concerned, is section 8 thereof. this has also undergone an amendment by virtue of act 21 of 2011 with retrospective effect from 25.10.2011. though the amendment has been brought about after the decision of the learned single judge in wp(c) 7655/2007, it will not alter the position insofar as the cases .....

P. Sankara Narayanan, Proprietor, Shri Bhuvaneswari Films Vs. State of ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2007Mad317; (2007)9VST401(Mad)

..... has been filed on behalf of the state, wherein it is indicated that intention of the (3rd amendment) act is to encourage of new films within the state and to enable low budget tamil films to withstand the competition from films produced in other languages and dubbed in tamil. it has been further stated that since ..... provisions contained in the (3rd amendment) act are discriminatory or violative of article 19. on the other hand, it is submitted that the object is to encourage and protect the producers, who produce their films in tamil, as they have to face stiff competition in the shape of dubbed tamil films.8. in : (2007)6scc624 (aashirwad films v. ..... justify the present provisions. the objects and reasons of the (2nd amendment) act, are extracted hereunder:statement of objects and reasons - with a view to encourage the production of new films in this state and to enable low budget tamil films to withstand the competition from films production on other languages and dubbed in tamil, it is .....