Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 10 Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 8,769 results (1.404 seconds)

Sehat Ali Khan and anr. Vs. Abdul Qavi Khan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1956All273

..... not apply.' this section was put in the present form by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the indian limitation (amendment) act, 1922 (act 10 of 1922). it appears to me that the amendment of section 29 in the year 1922 was made by the indian legislature, principally, on account of the different interpretations which had been ..... by the course of legislation culminating in the present section 29(2).12. prior to its amendment in 1922 by the indian limitation (amendment) act of that year, sub-section (1) (b) of section 29 of the present act provided that'nothing in this act shall --(b) affect or alter any period of limitation specially prescribed for in a suit ..... period of limitation prescribed were applicable to the determination of the period of limitation prescribed by any special or local law. in the limitation act of 1908 before its amendment and jn the limitation act 15 of 1877 the corresponding provision was as follows: 'when, by any special or local law now or hereafter in force in british .....

Koer Durag Pal Singh Vs. Th. Pancham Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1939All403

..... say complete code in themselves and those which did not. the i legislature then in the year 1922 set the controversy at rest by amending section 29 of the act of 1908 by the amending act 10 of 1922. by the amendment it was provided that:.and for the purpose of determining any period of limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by any ..... law. it might be mentioned that in the above-mentioned case, section 12, limitation act, was applied to the provincial insolvency act. it is true that section 29, limitation act, was amended by the limitation amendment act, 10 of 1922, and now only some of the general provisions of the limitation act, namely sections 4, 9 to 18 and section 22 apply to special and local laws .....

Dr. Neeraj Shukla and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... within the limitation indicated in the judgment. the 50% cap on carry forward vacancy (backlog vacancy) was lifted by art.16 (4-b) introduced by the constitution 81st amendment act, 2000. the ceiling limit of 50% on current vacancies, however continued to remain. in working out the carry forward rule, it was cautioned in m. nagraj, that ..... which they are being filled up for determining the ceiling of fifty per cent reservation on total number of vacancies of that year." 96. the constitution (eighty-first amendment) act, 2000 gives, in substance, legislative assent to the judgment of this court in r. k. sabharwal8. once it is held that each point in the roster indicates ..... . before dealing with the scope of the constitutional amendments we need to recap the judgments in indra sawhney and r. k. sabharwal. in the former case the majority held that 50% rule should be applied to each year otherwise it may happen that the open competition channel may get choked if the entire cadre strength is taken .....

Ganeshilal and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, U. P. and C. P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1947]15ITR1(All)

..... hence this reference.in order to appreciate the controversy between the parties, it is necessary to bear in mind the terms of section 4 of the income-tax act, as it stood before the amendment of 1939. that section, so far as it is material for the purposes of this reference, is as follows :-'4 (1) save as hereinafter provided ..... to the assessee from the cairo business under section 4 (2) of the indian income-tax act, 1922 (prior to its amendment in 1939), for assessment on the remittance basis, such expenses as are not admissible under section 10 (2) of the act are deductible from the gross profits in addition to those that are admissible under this section ?' ..... , this act shall apply to all income, profits or gains, as described or comprised in section 6, from whatever source derived, accruing or arising, or received in british .....

Natraj Chhabigrih, Sigra Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All375

..... ground for striking impugned proviso is, there is no justification for classification between the cinemas which were under some incentive schemes and other class of cinemas. by amending act (act no. 14 of 1992) in section 3-a in sub-section (i) relevant sub-para (a) was introduced under which an extra charge of twenty- ..... even improvement of the cinema machines. emphasis was, with the changing technolgy, to keep abreast with the developments to confer best possible entertainments and to survive in competition it requires up-dating projection, screening, audio visible effect and such developments would also be withinthe meaning of 'maintenance', hence it cannot be said any class ..... and in inevitable duty of the proprietors. but it seems without giving help he cannot stand in the competition of this industry. the state decided to help such proprietors. thus the objective of the amendment by permitting charging of maintenance charge and not treating it to be part of charge for entertainment to .....

Lakhan Singh Vs. Balbir Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1953All342

..... existing law relating to contempt of court was, therefore, saved from the operation of article 19(1)(a). clause (2) of article 19 was, however, amended by the constitution first amendment act, 1951. after the amendment the clause reads as follows :'(2) nothing in sub-clause, (a) of clause (1) shall .affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent ..... the articles of 27-6-1951 and 11/18-7-1951 constitute a contempt of court.10. it has been contended, however, that the indian constitution as amended by the constitution (first amendment) act, 1951, has altered the situation and the previous law of contempt is no longer in force. clause (1) (a) of article 19 of the ..... trial is not a 'free trade in ideas', nor is the best test of truth in a courtroom 'the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market'.'comment, however, forthright is one thing. identi-fication with respect to specific matters still in judicial suspense is quite another.8. in pennekamp v. florida .....

Namrata Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

..... 19th february, 2009 the ordinance was replaced by the uttar pradesh sugar undertakings (acquisition) (amendment) act, 2009 (u.p. act no. 3 of 2009). therefore, said writ petition no. 47934 of 2008 was amended challenging the vires of the said amendment act, 2009. 8. vide u.p. act no. 3 of 2009 new sections, being sections 3-a, 3-b, 3- ..... rupees 3000 crores. 26. in dealing with the point involved in this case, it is necessary to read sections 19 and 26 of the competition act. 27. section 19 of the competition act empowers the commission to make enquiry into any contravention of the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 3 or sub-section (1) of ..... in the sugar corporation. section 3-c permits the state government to change the land use. section 3-d provides that the government order dated 04th june, 2007 and all subsequent government orders, notifications or policy statements issued and actions taken in relation to disinvestment, privatisation, sale, transfer in any form shall stand validated. .....

Regional Transport Authority and anr. Vs. Sri Kashi Prasad Gupta and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1962All551

..... the case of displaced operators whose permits are cancelled on the 'nationalisation' of their route, the elaborate procedure under section 47 is not to be followed. by the amending act no. 100 of 1956, parliament provided in effect that a displaced operator may be offered a permit of an alternative route and if he accepts the offer, he ..... of a restriction cannot increase the original content of the right. it by amending the motor vehicles act, the state were to remove the limit on the number of buses on all routes (while preserving all the other restrictions) no bus owner could object to competition from new comers in the business. i do not understand how he can ..... right can increase the legal content of that right.72. to sum up my opinion on this point, any immunity from open competition enjoyed by the holder of a permit under the motor vehicles act is an incidental and indirect benefit resulting from the restrictions imposed on the motor transport business and creates no vested right in him .....

Ravindra Kumar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2387

..... june, 1995. (it would be relevant to state here that no arguments were raised before us challenging the validity of the constitutional (77th amendment) act, 1995.) this amendment permits the state to make provision for reservation in matter of promotion in favour of scheduled caste and scheduled tribes in case they are not ..... is that it promotes inefficiency in administration by choosing substandard candidates in preference to those with better mettle. competitive skill is more relevant in higher posts, especially those where selection is made by competitive examinations. lesser classes of posts, where promotion is secured mechanically by virtue of seniority except where the candidate ..... there will be complete reservation ....... on some other occasions the post will be available for open competition when in fact on all such occasions, a single post cadre should have been filled only by open competition amongst all segments of the society.'17. before we apply these reasoning to the facts of .....

Hemant Krishna Maurya and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... the ultimate power to fix norms and standards for admission to medical colleges vests in the medical council of india under the indian medical council act, 1956 read with the indian medical council (amendment) act, 1993. so far as admissions to medical colleges are concerned, the regulations framed by the medical council of india under section 33 of ..... categories (category rank) shall also be indicated along with their combined merit (state rank).4. in case of two or more candidates obtaining equal marks in the competitive entrance examination, their inter-se rank will be determined in order of preference as under:(a) candidate obtaining higher marks in questions with two correct options of the ..... supreme court in banking service recruitment board, madras v. v. ramalingam and ors. : (1998) 8 scc 523, union of india and ors. v. vinodh kumar and ors. : (2007) 8 scc 100 and ombir singh and anr. etc. v. state of u.p. and ors. etc. (1992) 2 uplbec 1295.11. sri ashok khare, learned senior counsel .....