Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: competition amendment act 2007 section 24 amendment of section 31 Page 94 of about 100,046 results (0.521 seconds)

Mar 29 1937 (FN)

Wright Vs. Vinton Branch

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to postpone the payment beyond one year. so construed, the clause is not unreasonable or arbitrary. p. 300 u. s. 467 . 9. the requirement of the amended act that the rents paid into court by the debtor in possession during stay of foreclosure shall be applied first on taxes and upkeep is consistent with the constitutional rights of ..... the mortgagee. p. 300 u. s. 468 . 10. the objection that the amended act unconstitutionally restricts a lienor's remedy under the state law by delays interposed to the enforcement of his rights is to be tested not by what might be permitted ..... sale whenever held, and thus to assure having the mortgaged property devoted primarily to the satisfaction of the debt, either through receipt of the proceeds of a fair competitive sale or by taking the property itself." "5. the right to control meanwhile the property during the period of default, subject only to the discretion of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 1940 (FN)

Tigner Vs. Texas

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that of texas had its origin in fear of the concentration of industrial power following the civil war. law was invoked to buttress the traditional system of free competition, free markets, and free enterprise. pressure for this legislation came more particularly from those who, as producers as well as consumers, constituted the most dispersed economic ..... union sewer pipe co., 184 u. s. 540 , as offensive to "the equal protection of the laws" which the fourteenth amendment safeguards. if that case controls, appellant contends, the texas act cannot survive. and he must go free. the court below recognized that the exemption was identical with that deemed fatal to the ..... but expressly inapplicable to "agricultural products or livestock while in the hands of the producer or raiser" held consistent with the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment. p. 310 u. s. 149 . 5. in effectuating its policy with respect to combinations in restraint of trade, the texas legislature, though exempting .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 1965 (FN)

Waterman S.S. Corp. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... subsection, the purchase price of a vessel on account of which a construction differential subsidy was paid or agreed to be paid under section 504 of the merchant marine act, 1936, as amended, shall be the net cost of the vessel to the owner." "(c) an adjustment shall be made under this section only if the applicant enters into an agreement with ..... -- the statutory sales price -- serves the congressional purpose of putting the two groups "on exactly the same basis." otherwise, pre-act purchasers, with a higher basis for federal income tax purposes, would have competitive advantages over post-act purchasers in the ability of pre-act purchasers to take higher depreciation deductions from income, thus paying lower taxes on the same income than their post .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 1975 (FN)

Alyeska Pipeline Svc. Co. Vs. Wilderness Soc'y

Court : US Supreme Court

..... . 77www(a); securities exchange act of 1934, 48 stat. 890, 897, as amended, 15 u.s.c. 78i(e), 78r(a ..... . 77k(e); trust indenture act, 53 stat. 1176, 15 u.s.c ..... u.s.c. 210(f); perishable agricultural commodities act, 46 stat. 535, 7 u.s.c. 499g(b); bankruptcy act, 11 u.s.c. 104(a)(1), 641-644; clayton act., 4, 38 stat. 731, 15 u.s.c. 15; unfair competition act, 39 stat. 798, 15 u.s.c. 72; securities act of 1933, 48 stat. 82, as amended, 48 stat. 907, 15 u.s.c .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 1985 (FN)

Thomas Vs. Union Carbide

Court : US Supreme Court

..... delivered the opinion of the court. this case requires the court to revisit the data-consideration provision of the federal insecticide, fungicide, and rodenticide act (fifra), 61 stat. 163, as amended, 7 u.s.c. 136 et seq., which was considered last term in ruckelshaus v. monsanto co., 467 u. s. 986 ( ..... must submit research data to the environmental protection agency (epa) concerning the product's health, safety, and environmental effects. the 1972 act established data-sharing provisions intended to streamline pesticide registration procedures, increase competition, and avoid unnecessary duplication of data-generation costs. s.rep. no. 92-838, pp. 72-73 (1972) (1972 ..... shall not be delayed pending the fixing of compensation." 7 u.s.c. 136a(c)(1)(d)(ii). [ footnote 2 ] following the 1978 amendments, appellees amended their complaints to allege that the data-consideration and disclosure provisions effected a taking of their property without just compensation and without due process of law. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 1986 (FN)

Frs Vs. Dimension Financial Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... offering limited checking account services to their customers. these institutions accepted " funds from the public that are, in actual practice, repaid on demand.'" amend the bank holding company act of 1956: hearings on s. 2253, s. 2418, page 474 u. s. 366 and h.r. 7371 before a subcommittee of the ..... that nonbank banks pose three dangers to the national banking system. first, by remaining outside the reach of banking regulations, nonbank banks have a significant competitive advantage over regulated banks, despite the functional equivalence of the services offered. second, the proliferation of nonbank banks threatens the structure established by congress for ..... was the "correct legal interpretation" of the 1956 statute, the board saw "no reason in policy to cover such institutions under this act." ibid. congress agreed, and accordingly amended the statutory definition of a bank in 1966, limiting its application to institutions that accept "deposits that the depositor has a legal right to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1993 (FN)

United States Nat. Bank of Ore. Vs. Independent Ins. Agents of America ...

Court : US Supreme Court

..... absence of section 92 from the code, congress has assumed that it remains in force, on one occasion actually amending it. see garn-st. germain depository institutions act of 1982, 403(b), 96 stat. 1511; see also competitive equality banking act of 1987, 201(b)(5), 101 stat. 583 (imposing a i-year moratorium on section 92 activities). the ..... is the first appearance of the provision eventually codified as 12 u. s. c. 92. after the quotation marks closed, the 1916 act went on to amend 14 of the federal reserve act, introducing the amendment with a phrase not surrounded by quotation marks and then placing the revised language of 14 within quotation marks. 39 stat. 754. ..... , since respondents raise the point, that our remark in posadas v. national city bank, 296 u. s. 497 , 502 (1936), that the 1916 act "amends [sections of the federal reserve act], and 5202 of the revised statutes" is obviously not controlling, coming as it did in an opinion that did not present the question we decide in these .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2008 (HC)

Assam Roller Flour Mills Association and ors. Vs. State of Assam and o ...

Court : Guwahati

..... hereinafter.15. during the pendency of these writ petitions, the assam agricultural produce market (amendment) act, 2006 (hereafter referred to as the 'act 2006'), was introduced effecting further amendments in the act. the act received the assent of the governor on 16.1.2007 and was published in the issue dated 20.1.2007 of the assam gazette extra ordinary.16. on the prayer made by the petitioners ..... . the model legislation was drawn up to ensure nation wide integration of agricultural market facilities, establishment of competitive agricultural markets in private and corporate sectors, creation of an environment conducive to emphasise investments in marketing related infrastructural facilities, modernization and strengthening of existing markets etc. act 2006, according to the answering respondent, has been enacted to promote the development of agricultural markets .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2007 (HC)

Amarendra Kumar Saikia and ors. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... % cannot be applicable in case of 'carry forward' and 'unfilled vacancies'. clubbing of the backlog vacancies with the current vacancies stands segregated by the constitution (eightyfirst amendment) act, 2000.40. once it is held that the cadre strength as the unit should be taken into account to determine whether the reservation upto the quota limit has ..... and r.k. sabharwal. in the former case the majority held that 50% rule should be applied to each year otherwise it may happen that the open competition channel may get choked if the entire cadre strength is taken as a unit. however, in r.k. sabharwal this court stated that the entire cadre strength ..... directed that the respondents shall conduct the selection afresh consistently with the observations made above and the entire process shall be completed on or before 30th november, 2007 including issuance of orders of promotion as per rules.the writ petition is answered in the above manner and allowed to the extent indicted above, leaving the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1963 (HC)

C.K. Iypunny Vs. R.N. Kulkarni and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1964Bom188; (1964)66BOMLR34; [1964(8)FLR175]; 1964MhLJ211

..... limiting the meaning of section in the manner suggested.12. coming to section 31 of the amending act of 1956 it reads as follows:'(1). if, immediately before the commencement of this act, there is in force in any state any provincial act or state act relating to the settlement or adjudication of disputes, the operation of such an ..... for enforcing an award made under its provisions the remedy under section 33c(2) is not available. in any case section 31 of the industrial disputes (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1956, which added section 33c (1) and (2) restricted its application.8. it is admitted by the petitioner that the right is claimed under an ..... act in that state in relation to matters covered by that act shall not be affected by the industrial disputes act, 1947 (14 of 1947), as amended by this act.'13. the word 'affect' is not .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //